C J Wiedermann1. 1. Zentralkrankenhaus Bozen, Lorenz Böhler Str. 5, 39100, Bozen, Italien, christian.wiedermann@asbz.it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent decades have been characterized by a large number of trials for registration of new drugs or indication approvals in the field of sepsis. Modern anti-inflammatory drugs or interventions are intended to correct the overwhelming dysregulation of inflammatory and coagulation pathways seen particularly in the early phase of sepsis. Immunostimulatory therapies are also being studied in order to correct immunoparalysis, which develops later in the course of sepsis as a compensatory mechanism. CURRENT STUDY RESULTS: Recombinant activated protein C, drotrecogin α, was conditionally approved and later withdrawn from the market by the producer because the initially observed beneficial effect could not be confirmed. The efficacy and safety of antithrombin, which, like drotrecogin α, also modulates inflammation and coagulation as an endogenous anticoagulant could not be confirmed when used for treating sepsis. As sepsis leads to disseminated intravascular coagulation which may be counteracted by antithrombin, new guidelines recommend antithrombin as a treatment option in this subgroup of sepsis patients. Intravenous administration of immunoglobulin, enteral administration of immunomodulating substances as immunonutrition, and the substitution of selenium, all showed some effectiveness in small heterogeneous studies, but their efficacy was not confirmed in large high-quality trials. Intensive glycemic control, which was temporarily recommended for acutely ill patients, increased the risk for adverse hypoglycemia in several clinical trials so that blood glucose target levels have been redefined and guidelines now no longer ask for normalization of blood glucose values with insulin. CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK: None of the new drugs, however, has successfully become established as a new standard of care. In the future, studies of novel sepsis therapies may succeed better if suitable biomarkers allow for patient selection, reflecting key pathophysiologic mechanisms that are targeted by the innovative drugs.
BACKGROUND: Recent decades have been characterized by a large number of trials for registration of new drugs or indication approvals in the field of sepsis. Modern anti-inflammatory drugs or interventions are intended to correct the overwhelming dysregulation of inflammatory and coagulation pathways seen particularly in the early phase of sepsis. Immunostimulatory therapies are also being studied in order to correct immunoparalysis, which develops later in the course of sepsis as a compensatory mechanism. CURRENT STUDY RESULTS: Recombinant activated protein C, drotrecogin α, was conditionally approved and later withdrawn from the market by the producer because the initially observed beneficial effect could not be confirmed. The efficacy and safety of antithrombin, which, like drotrecogin α, also modulates inflammation and coagulation as an endogenous anticoagulant could not be confirmed when used for treating sepsis. As sepsis leads to disseminated intravascular coagulation which may be counteracted by antithrombin, new guidelines recommend antithrombin as a treatment option in this subgroup of sepsispatients. Intravenous administration of immunoglobulin, enteral administration of immunomodulating substances as immunonutrition, and the substitution of selenium, all showed some effectiveness in small heterogeneous studies, but their efficacy was not confirmed in large high-quality trials. Intensive glycemic control, which was temporarily recommended for acutely ill patients, increased the risk for adverse hypoglycemia in several clinical trials so that blood glucose target levels have been redefined and guidelines now no longer ask for normalization of blood glucose values with insulin. CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK: None of the new drugs, however, has successfully become established as a new standard of care. In the future, studies of novel sepsis therapies may succeed better if suitable biomarkers allow for patient selection, reflecting key pathophysiologic mechanisms that are targeted by the innovative drugs.
Authors: R Phillip Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Jean M Carlet; Julian Bion; Margaret M Parker; Roman Jaeschke; Konrad Reinhart; Derek C Angus; Christian Brun-Buisson; Richard Beale; Thierry Calandra; Jean-Francois Dhainaut; Herwig Gerlach; Maurene Harvey; John J Marini; John Marshall; Marco Ranieri; Graham Ramsay; Jonathan Sevransky; B Taylor Thompson; Sean Townsend; Jeffrey S Vender; Janice L Zimmerman; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Junhee Seok; H Shaw Warren; Alex G Cuenca; Michael N Mindrinos; Henry V Baker; Weihong Xu; Daniel R Richards; Grace P McDonald-Smith; Hong Gao; Laura Hennessy; Celeste C Finnerty; Cecilia M López; Shari Honari; Ernest E Moore; Joseph P Minei; Joseph Cuschieri; Paul E Bankey; Jeffrey L Johnson; Jason Sperry; Avery B Nathens; Timothy R Billiar; Michael A West; Marc G Jeschke; Matthew B Klein; Richard L Gamelli; Nicole S Gibran; Bernard H Brownstein; Carol Miller-Graziano; Steve E Calvano; Philip H Mason; J Perren Cobb; Laurence G Rahme; Stephen F Lowry; Ronald V Maier; Lyle L Moldawer; David N Herndon; Ronald W Davis; Wenzhong Xiao; Ronald G Tompkins Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-02-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yaseen M Arabi; Ousama C Dabbagh; Hani M Tamim; Abdullah A Al-Shimemeri; Ziad A Memish; Samir H Haddad; Sofia J Syed; Hema R Giridhar; Asgar H Rishu; Mouhamad O Al-Daker; Salim H Kahoul; Riette J Britts; Maram H Sakkijha Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Yasser Sakr; Vivian P L Maia; Clesar Santos; Julia Stracke; Mohamed Zeidan; Ole Bayer; Konrad Reinhart Journal: Crit Care Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Martin Sebastian Winkler; Anne Rissiek; Marion Priefler; Edzard Schwedhelm; Linda Robbe; Antonia Bauer; Corinne Zahrte; Christian Zoellner; Stefan Kluge; Axel Nierhaus Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 3.240