M Christ1, H Dormann, R Enk, S Popp, K Singler, C Müller, H Mang. 1. Klinik für Notfall- und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Klinikum Nürnberg, Prof.-Ernst-Nathan-Str. 1, 90419, Nürnberg, Deutschland, michael.christ@klinikum-nuernberg.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A large number of patients present to the emergency department (ED) for evaluation of acute chest pain. About 10-15% are caused by acute myocardial infarction (MI), and over 50% of cases are due to noncardiac reasons. Further improvement for chest pain evaluation appears necessary. OBJECTIVES: What are current options to improve chest pain evaluation in Germany? METHODS: A selective literature search was performed using the following terms: "chest pain", "emergency department", "acute coronary syndrome" and "chest pain evaluation". RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A working group of the German Society of Cardiology published recommendations for infrastructure, equipment and organisation of chest pain units in Germany, which should be separated from the ED of hospitals and be under the leadership of a cardiologist. A symptom-based decision for acute care would be preferable if all differential diagnoses of diseases could be managed by one medical specialty: However, all four main symptoms of patients with acute MI (chest pain, acute dyspnea, abdominal pain, dizziness) are also caused by diseases of different specialties. Evaluation and treatment of acute chest pain by representatives of one specialty would lead to over- or undertreatment of affected patients. Therefore we suggest a multidisciplinary evaluation of patients with acute chest pain including representatives of emergency and critical care physicians, cardiologists, internists, geriatricians, family physicians, premedics and emergency nurses. Definition of key indicators of performance and institutionalized feedback will help to further improve quality of care.
BACKGROUND: A large number of patients present to the emergency department (ED) for evaluation of acute chest pain. About 10-15% are caused by acute myocardial infarction (MI), and over 50% of cases are due to noncardiac reasons. Further improvement for chest pain evaluation appears necessary. OBJECTIVES: What are current options to improve chest pain evaluation in Germany? METHODS: A selective literature search was performed using the following terms: "chest pain", "emergency department", "acute coronary syndrome" and "chest pain evaluation". RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A working group of the German Society of Cardiology published recommendations for infrastructure, equipment and organisation of chest pain units in Germany, which should be separated from the ED of hospitals and be under the leadership of a cardiologist. A symptom-based decision for acute care would be preferable if all differential diagnoses of diseases could be managed by one medical specialty: However, all four main symptoms of patients with acute MI (chest pain, acute dyspnea, abdominal pain, dizziness) are also caused by diseases of different specialties. Evaluation and treatment of acute chest pain by representatives of one specialty would lead to over- or undertreatment of affected patients. Therefore we suggest a multidisciplinary evaluation of patients with acute chest pain including representatives of emergency and critical care physicians, cardiologists, internists, geriatricians, family physicians, premedics and emergency nurses. Definition of key indicators of performance and institutionalized feedback will help to further improve quality of care.
Authors: Florian F Grossmann; Christian H Nickel; Michael Christ; Kristian Schneider; Rebecca Spirig; Roland Bingisser Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2010-10-16 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: W Frank Peacock; Gregg C Fonarow; Douglas S Ander; Sean P Collins; Mihai Gheorghiade; J Douglas Kirk; Gerasimos Filippatos; Deborah B Diercks; Robin J Trupp; Brian Hiestand; Ezra A Amsterdam; William T Abraham; Ezra A Amsterdam; Gail Dodge; David F Gaieski; Diane Gurney; Christy O Hayes; Judd E Hollander; Kay Holmes; James L Januzzi; Phillip Levy; Alan Maisel; Chadwick D Miller; Peter S Pang; Elsie Selby; Alan B Storrow; Neal L Weintraub; Clyde W Yancy; Raymond D Bahr; Andra L Blomkalns; James McCord; Richard M Nowak; Robert J Stomel Journal: Acute Card Care Date: 2009
Authors: Donald Lloyd-Jones; Robert J Adams; Todd M Brown; Mercedes Carnethon; Shifan Dai; Giovanni De Simone; T Bruce Ferguson; Earl Ford; Karen Furie; Cathleen Gillespie; Alan Go; Kurt Greenlund; Nancy Haase; Susan Hailpern; P Michael Ho; Virginia Howard; Brett Kissela; Steven Kittner; Daniel Lackland; Lynda Lisabeth; Ariane Marelli; Mary M McDermott; James Meigs; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Véronique L Roger; Wayne Rosamond; Ralph Sacco; Paul Sorlie; Randall Stafford; Thomas Thom; Sylvia Wasserthiel-Smoller; Nathan D Wong; Judith Wylie-Rosett Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Martin Mockel; Julia Searle; Reinhold Muller; Anna Slagman; Harald Storchmann; Philipp Oestereich; Werner Wyrwich; Angela Ale-Abaei; Joern O Vollert; Matthias Koch; Rajan Somasundaram Journal: Eur J Emerg Med Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.799
Authors: Kurt Huber; Bernard J Gersh; Patrick Goldstein; Christopher B Granger; Paul W Armstrong Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: R R Roberts; R J Zalenski; E K Mensah; R J Rydman; G Ciavarella; L Gussow; K Das; L M Kampe; B Dickover; M F McDermott; A Hart; H E Straus; D G Murphy; R Rao Journal: JAMA Date: 1997-11-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michael Christ; Steffen Popp; Hella Pohlmann; Michail Poravas; Dina Umarov; Ruth Bach; Thomas Bertsch Journal: Am J Med Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Karl Heinrich Scholz; Sebastian K G Maier; Jens Jung; Claus Fleischmann; Gerald S Werner; Hans G Olbrich; Dorothe Ahlersmann; Friederike K Keating; Claudius Jacobshagen; Hiller Moehlis; Reinhard Hilgers; Lars S Maier Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Till Keller; Felix Post; Stergios Tzikas; Astrid Schneider; Sven Arnolds; Oliver Scheiba; Stefan Blankenberg; Thomas Münzel; Sabine Genth-Zotz Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 5.460