Jonathan T Finnoff1, Mederic M Hall2, Erik Adams3, David Berkoff4, Andrew L Concoff5, William Dexter6, Jay Smith7. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic college of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Sports Medicine Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 2. Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa Sports Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 3. Midwest Sports Medicine Institute, Middleton, Wisconsin, USA. 4. Department of Orthopaedics and Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 5. Outpatient Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, St. Jude Medical Center, Fullerton, California, USA Department of Family Medicine, Division of Sports Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. 6. Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, USA Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 7. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Sports Medicine Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of diagnostic and interventional ultrasound has significantly increased over the past decade. A majority of the increased utilisation is by non-radiologists. In sports medicine, ultrasound is often used to guide interventions such as aspirations, diagnostic or therapeutic injections, tenotomies, releases and hydrodissections. OBJECTIVE: Critically review the literature related to the accuracy, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided injections (USGIs) in major, intermediate and small joints; and soft tissues. DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: USGIs are more accurate than landmark-guided injections (LMGIs; strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT) Evidence Rating=A). USGIs are more efficacious than LMGIs (SORT Evidence Rating=B). USGIs are more cost-effective than LMGIs (SORT Evidence Rating=B). Ultrasound guidance is required to perform many new procedures (SORT Evidence Rating=C). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this position statement indicate there is strong evidence that USGIs are more accurate than LMGI, moderate evidence that they are more efficacious and preliminary evidence that they are more cost-effective. Furthermore, ultrasound-guided (USG) is required to perform many new, advanced procedures and will likely enable the development of innovative USG surgical techniques in the future. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: The use of diagnostic and interventional ultrasound has significantly increased over the past decade. A majority of the increased utilisation is by non-radiologists. In sports medicine, ultrasound is often used to guide interventions such as aspirations, diagnostic or therapeutic injections, tenotomies, releases and hydrodissections. OBJECTIVE: Critically review the literature related to the accuracy, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided injections (USGIs) in major, intermediate and small joints; and soft tissues. DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: USGIs are more accurate than landmark-guided injections (LMGIs; strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT) Evidence Rating=A). USGIs are more efficacious than LMGIs (SORT Evidence Rating=B). USGIs are more cost-effective than LMGIs (SORT Evidence Rating=B). Ultrasound guidance is required to perform many new procedures (SORT Evidence Rating=C). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this position statement indicate there is strong evidence that USGIs are more accurate than LMGI, moderate evidence that they are more efficacious and preliminary evidence that they are more cost-effective. Furthermore, ultrasound-guided (USG) is required to perform many new, advanced procedures and will likely enable the development of innovative USG surgical techniques in the future. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Jean-Sébastien Roy; Caroline Braën; Jean Leblond; François Desmeules; Clermont E Dionne; Joy C MacDermid; Nathalie J Bureau; Pierre Frémont Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Jackie L Whittaker; Richard Ellis; Paul William Hodges; Cliona OSullivan; Julie Hides; Samuel Fernandez-Carnero; Jose Luis Arias-Buria; Deydre S Teyhen; Maria J Stokes Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Robert Schleip; Paul William Hodges; Martina Zügel; Constantinos N Maganaris; Jan Wilke; Karin Jurkat-Rott; Werner Klingler; Scott C Wearing; Thomas Findley; Mary F Barbe; Jürgen Michael Steinacker; Andry Vleeming; Wilhelm Bloch Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 13.800