Literature DB >> 25329961

Estimating risk of low radiation doses - a critical review of the BEIR VII report and its use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis.

Edward J Calabrese1, Michael K O'Connor.   

Abstract

This article explores the origin of the linear no-threshold (LNT) dose-response model and how it came to be used in cancer risk assessment worldwide. Following this historical appraisal is an evaluation of the LNT model, within the framework of the BEIR VII report of the National Academy of Sciences, on the health effects of ionizing radiation. The final section of this article provides an assessment of the LNT model's capacity to make accurate predictions of risk in the low-dose zone based on recent molecular mechanistic findings and epidemiological methods, with particular emphasis on the limitations of epidemiological studies to estimate risks in the low-dose zone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25329961     DOI: 10.1667/RR13829.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  16 in total

1.  LNT RIP: It is time to bury the linear no threshold hypothesis.

Authors:  Christopher L Hansen; Rittu Hingorani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Patient Dose Management: Focus on Practical Actions.

Authors:  Michael Yong Park; Seung Eun Jung
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Is the Linear No-Threshold Dose-Response Paradigm Still Necessary for the Assessment of Health Effects of Low Dose Radiation?

Authors:  Ki Moon Seong; Songwon Seo; Dalnim Lee; Min-Jeong Kim; Seung-Sook Lee; Sunhoo Park; Young Woo Jin
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Dose and Radioadaptive Response Analysis of Micronucleus Induction in Mouse Bone Marrow.

Authors:  Laura A Bannister; Rebecca R Mantha; Yvonne Devantier; Eugenia S Petoukhov; Chantal L A Brideau; Mandy L Serran; Dmitry Y Klokov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Exposure to low dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening and risk of cancer: secondary analysis of trial data and risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Cristiano Rampinelli; Paolo De Marco; Daniela Origgi; Patrick Maisonneuve; Monica Casiraghi; Giulia Veronesi; Lorenzo Spaggiari; Massimo Bellomi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-02-08

6.  New adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction ASiR-V: Assessment of noise performance in comparison to ASiR.

Authors:  Paolo De Marco; Daniela Origgi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  γH2AX, 53BP1 and Rad51 protein foci changes in mesenchymal stem cells during prolonged X-ray irradiation.

Authors:  Anastasia Tsvetkova; Ivan V Ozerov; Margarita Pustovalova; Anna Grekhova; Petr Eremin; Natalia Vorobyeva; Ilya Eremin; Andrey Pulin; Vadim Zorin; Pavel Kopnin; Sergey Leonov; Alex Zhavoronkov; Dmitry Klokov; Andreyan N Osipov
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-12

8.  Cytogenetic damage analysis in mice chronically exposed to low-dose internal tritium beta-particle radiation.

Authors:  Sandrine Roch-Lefèvre; Eric Grégoire; Cécile Martin-Bodiot; Matthew Flegal; Amélie Fréneau; Melinda Blimkie; Laura Bannister; Heather Wyatt; Joan-Francesc Barquinero; Laurence Roy; Mohamed Benadjaoud; Nick Priest; Jean-René Jourdain; Dmitry Klokov
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-06-08

9.  Continuous Low-Dose-Rate Irradiation Promotes Growth of Silkworms.

Authors:  Yuta Shibamoto; Yoshiaki Kamei; Koichi Kamei; Takahiro Tsuchiya; Natsuto Aoyama
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 10.  Overview of Biological, Epidemiological, and Clinical Evidence of Radiation Hormesis.

Authors:  Yuta Shibamoto; Hironobu Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.