BACKGROUND: Intramuscular (IM) injection can increase insulin absorption, causing hypoglycemia. Available needle lengths today are 4-12.7 mm for pens and 6-12.7 mm for syringes. We describe the distance (D) from skin surface to muscle fascia at injection sites for subcutaneous (SC) insulin therapy and recommend needle lengths to reduce IM injection risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At two locations in the United States, skin and SC fat thicknesses were measured by ultrasound at the abdomen, arm, thigh, and buttock in diverse adults (body mass index [BMI] range, approximately 19-65 kg/m²) with diabetes (n=341 with one or more paired skin and SC measurement, permitting calculation of D). The natural log of D by body site, BMI, and gender were analyzed using a mixed model to estimate IM risk. RESULTS: D varied significantly by body site, BMI, and gender (each P<0.001), increasing with higher BMI and in women. Median D ranged from 10.9 mm (95% confidence interval, 10.3, 11.6) at the thigh to 16.9 mm (15.9, 18.1) at the buttock. Minimum D was <3 mm at the thigh and <5 mm elsewhere. When inserted 90° without pinch-up, the most commonly used needle worldwide (8 mm) has estimated IM risks of 25% and 9.7%, respectively, in the thigh and abdomen, versus 1.6% and 0.1%, respectively, with a 4 mm needle. A 45° insertion reduces, but does not eliminate, IM risk with longer needles. CONCLUSIONS: Gender, BMI, and body site affect D; when combined with needle length and insertion angle, these factors permit detailed estimates of IM insulin injection risk. Such risk varies across sites, appears greatest at the thigh, is unnecessarily increased with 8 mm and 12.7 mm needles, and is greatly reduced with shorter-length needles and good injection technique.
BACKGROUND: Intramuscular (IM) injection can increase insulin absorption, causing hypoglycemia. Available needle lengths today are 4-12.7 mm for pens and 6-12.7 mm for syringes. We describe the distance (D) from skin surface to muscle fascia at injection sites for subcutaneous (SC) insulin therapy and recommend needle lengths to reduce IM injection risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At two locations in the United States, skin and SC fat thicknesses were measured by ultrasound at the abdomen, arm, thigh, and buttock in diverse adults (body mass index [BMI] range, approximately 19-65 kg/m²) with diabetes (n=341 with one or more paired skin and SC measurement, permitting calculation of D). The natural log of D by body site, BMI, and gender were analyzed using a mixed model to estimate IM risk. RESULTS: D varied significantly by body site, BMI, and gender (each P<0.001), increasing with higher BMI and in women. Median D ranged from 10.9 mm (95% confidence interval, 10.3, 11.6) at the thigh to 16.9 mm (15.9, 18.1) at the buttock. Minimum D was <3 mm at the thigh and <5 mm elsewhere. When inserted 90° without pinch-up, the most commonly used needle worldwide (8 mm) has estimated IM risks of 25% and 9.7%, respectively, in the thigh and abdomen, versus 1.6% and 0.1%, respectively, with a 4 mm needle. A 45° insertion reduces, but does not eliminate, IM risk with longer needles. CONCLUSIONS: Gender, BMI, and body site affect D; when combined with needle length and insertion angle, these factors permit detailed estimates of IM insulin injection risk. Such risk varies across sites, appears greatest at the thigh, is unnecessarily increased with 8 mm and 12.7 mm needles, and is greatly reduced with shorter-length needles and good injection technique.
Authors: Christopher Rini; Bruce C Roberts; Didier Morel; Rick Klug; Benjamin Selvage; Ronald J Pettis Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2019-03-17
Authors: Werner Regittnig; Mathias Tschaikner; Alexandru-Cristian Tuca; Amra Simic; Jürgen Feiel; Roland Schaller-Ammann; Alexander H Licht; Miró Jungklaus; Thomas R Pieber Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2021-11-17 Impact factor: 6.408