Literature DB >> 25329599

Current challenges in air sampling of semivolatile organic contaminants: sampling artifacts and their influence on data comparability.

Lisa Melymuk1, Pernilla Bohlin, Ondřej Sáňka, Karla Pozo, Jana Klánová.   

Abstract

With current science and policy needs, more attention is being given to expanding and improving air sampling of semivolatile organic contaminants (SVOCs). However, a wide range of techniques and configurations are currently used (active and passive samplers, different deployment times, different sorbents, etc.) and as the SVOC community looks to assess air measurements on a global scale, questions of comparability arise. We review current air sampling techniques, with a focus on sampling artifacts that can lead to uncertainties or biases in reported concentrations, in particular breakthrough, degradation, meteorological influences, and assumptions regarding passive sampling. From this assessment, we estimate the bias introduced for SVOC concentrations from all factors. Due to the effects of breakthrough, degradation, particle fractions and sampler uptake periods, some current passive and active sampler configurations may underestimate certain SVOCs by 30-95%. We then recommend future study design, appropriateness of sampler types for different study goals, and finally, how the SVOC community should move forward in both research and monitoring to best achieve comparability and consistency in air measurements.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25329599     DOI: 10.1021/es502164r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

1.  Transport stability of pesticides and PAHs sequestered in polyethylene passive sampling devices.

Authors:  Carey E Donald; Marc R Elie; Brian W Smith; Peter D Hoffman; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Latitudinal distribution of OCPs in the open ocean atmosphere between the Argentinian coast and Antarctic Peninsula.

Authors:  Guido Noé Rimondino; Ana Julieta Pepino; Martín Diego Manetti; Luis Olcese; Gustavo Alejandro Argüello
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Calibration and evaluation of PUF-PAS sampling rates across the Global Atmospheric Passive Sampling (GAPS) network.

Authors:  Nicholas J Herkert; Scott N Spak; Austen Smith; Jasmin K Schuster; Tom Harner; Andres Martinez; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.238

4.  Effects of room airflow on accurate determination of PUF-PAS sampling rates in the indoor environment.

Authors:  Nicholas J Herkert; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.238

5.  A Model Using Local Weather Data to Determine the Effective Sampling Volume for PCB Congeners Collected on Passive Air Samplers.

Authors:  Nicholas J Herkert; Andres Martinez; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  The combined effects of sampling parameters on the sorbent tube sampling of phthalates in air.

Authors:  Sang-Hee Jo; Ki-Hyun Kim; Kyenghee Kwon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Fully Automated Online Dynamic In-Tube Extraction for Continuous Sampling of Volatile Organic Compounds in Air.

Authors:  Hangzhen Lan; Jani Holopainen; Kari Hartonen; Matti Jussila; Mikko Ritala; Marja-Liisa Riekkola
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 6.986

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.