Literature DB >> 25329326

From gesture to sign language: conventionalization of classifier constructions by adult hearing learners of British Sign Language.

Chloë R Marshall1, Gary Morgan.   

Abstract

There has long been interest in why languages are shaped the way they are, and in the relationship between sign language and gesture. In sign languages, entity classifiers are handshapes that encode how objects move, how they are located relative to one another, and how multiple objects of the same type are distributed in space. Previous studies have shown that hearing adults who are asked to use only manual gestures to describe how objects move in space will use gestures that bear some similarities to classifiers. We investigated how accurately hearing adults, who had been learning British Sign Language (BSL) for 1-3 years, produce and comprehend classifiers in (static) locative and distributive constructions. In a production task, learners of BSL knew that they could use their hands to represent objects, but they had difficulty choosing the same, conventionalized, handshapes as native signers. They were, however, highly accurate at encoding location and orientation information. Learners therefore show the same pattern found in sign-naïve gesturers. In contrast, handshape, orientation, and location were comprehended with equal (high) accuracy, and testing a group of sign-naïve adults showed that they too were able to understand classifiers with higher than chance accuracy. We conclude that adult learners of BSL bring their visuo-spatial knowledge and gestural abilities to the tasks of understanding and producing constructions that contain entity classifiers. We speculate that investigating the time course of adult sign language acquisition might shed light on how gesture became (and, indeed, becomes) conventionalized during the genesis of sign languages.
Copyright © 2014 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classifiers; Gesture; L2 learners; Morphology; Phonology; Sign language; Spatial expressions; Visuo-spatial processing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25329326     DOI: 10.1111/tops.12118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1756-8757


  7 in total

1.  Age of acquisition effects differ across linguistic domains in sign language: EEG evidence.

Authors:  Evie A Malaia; Julia Krebs; Dietmar Roehm; Ronnie B Wilbur
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  L2M1 and L2M2 Acquisition of Sign Lexicon: The Impact of Multimodality on the Sign Second Language Acquisition.

Authors:  Krister Schönström; Ingela Holmström
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  Breaking Into Language in a New Modality: The Role of Input and Individual Differences in Recognising Signs.

Authors:  Julia Elisabeth Hofweber; Lizzy Aumonier; Vikki Janke; Marianne Gullberg; Chloe Marshall
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-18

Review 4.  On language acquisition in speech and sign: development of combinatorial structure in both modalities.

Authors:  Gary Morgan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-11

5.  Using the Hands to Represent Objects in Space: Gesture as a Substrate for Signed Language Acquisition.

Authors:  Vikki Janke; Chloë R Marshall
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-11-20

Review 6.  Iconicity and Sign Lexical Acquisition: A Review.

Authors:  Gerardo Ortega
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-02

7.  Visual form of ASL verb signs predicts non-signer judgment of transitivity.

Authors:  Chuck Bradley; Evie A Malaia; Jeffrey Mark Siskind; Ronnie B Wilbur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.