Literature DB >> 25329080

Distraction control processes in free recall: benefits and costs to performance.

John E Marsh1, Patrik Sörqvist2, Helen M Hodgetts3, C Philip Beaman4, Dylan M Jones5.   

Abstract

How is semantic memory influenced by individual differences under conditions of distraction? This question was addressed by observing how participants recalled visual target words--drawn from a single category--while ignoring spoken distractor words that were members of either the same or a different (single) category. Working memory capacity (WMC) was related to disruption only with synchronous, not asynchronous, presentation, and distraction was greater when the words were presented synchronously. Subsequent experiments found greater negative priming of distractors among individuals with higher WMC, but this may be dependent on targets and distractors being comparable category exemplars. With less dominant category members as distractors, target recall was impaired--relative to control--only among individuals with low WMC. The results highlight the role of cognitive control resources in target-distractor selection and the individual-specific cost implications of such cognitive control. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25329080     DOI: 10.1037/a0037779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  7 in total

1.  Variation in strategy use across measures of verbal working memory.

Authors:  Alexandra B Morrison; Gail M Rosenbaum; Damien Fair; Jason M Chein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-08

2.  Erroneous and veridical recall are not two sides of the same coin: Evidence from semantic distraction in free recall.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Robert W Hughes; Patrik Sörqvist; C Philip Beaman; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Concentration: The Neural Underpinnings of How Cognitive Load Shields Against Distraction.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; Örjan Dahlström; Thomas Karlsson; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Effects of Task Interruption and Background Speech on Word Processed Writing.

Authors:  Marijke Keus van de Poll; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-04-13

5.  How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell; François Vachon; Paul J Taylor; Robert W Hughes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  How Concentration Shields Against Distraction.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; John E Marsh
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-08

7.  Negative priming in free recall reconsidered.

Authors:  Maciej Hanczakowski; C Philip Beaman; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.051

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.