Jason S Scibek1, Christopher R Carcia2. 1. Department of Athletic Training, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Electromagnetic tracking systems have enabled some investigators and clinicians to measure tri-planar scapular motion; yet, they are not practical and affordable options for all clinicians. Currently, the ability to affordably quantify scapular motion is limited to monitoring only the motion of scapular upward rotation, with use of a digital inclinometer. HYPOTHESIS/ PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the criterion-related validity of a modified digital inclinometer when used to measure the motion of scapular anterior-posterior (AP) tilt. MATERIALS & METHODS: Thirteen volunteers, free from any history of shoulder injury, reported for a single testing session. Each subject underwent a brief shoulder and posture examination in order to confirm the absence of pathology. Subjects actively performed clinically relevant amounts of humeral elevation in the scapular plane while in a seated position. An electromagnetic tracking system (Ascension Technology, Burlington, VT) and a modified inclinometer (Pro 360, Baseline®, Fabrication Enterprises, White Plains, NY) were used to acquire scapular AP tilt over the same shoulder motions. Criterion-related validity was determined using Pearson Product Moment correlations. RESULTS: Correlation analyses revealed significant moderate to good associations (r = 0.63 to 0.86, p < 0.01) between scapular AP tilt measures obtained with a digital inclinometer and an electromagnetic tracking system. CONCLUSIONS: A modified digital inclinometer is a moderately valid device to use for the quantification of scapular AP tilt. Further study is warranted to establish reliability and to validate use of the device in patients with shoulder injury or pathology. The modified inclinometer expands the clinician's ability to quantify scapular kinematic motion during the clinical evaluation and rehabilitation process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
BACKGROUND: Electromagnetic tracking systems have enabled some investigators and clinicians to measure tri-planar scapular motion; yet, they are not practical and affordable options for all clinicians. Currently, the ability to affordably quantify scapular motion is limited to monitoring only the motion of scapular upward rotation, with use of a digital inclinometer. HYPOTHESIS/ PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the criterion-related validity of a modified digital inclinometer when used to measure the motion of scapular anterior-posterior (AP) tilt. MATERIALS & METHODS: Thirteen volunteers, free from any history of shoulder injury, reported for a single testing session. Each subject underwent a brief shoulder and posture examination in order to confirm the absence of pathology. Subjects actively performed clinically relevant amounts of humeral elevation in the scapular plane while in a seated position. An electromagnetic tracking system (Ascension Technology, Burlington, VT) and a modified inclinometer (Pro 360, Baseline®, Fabrication Enterprises, White Plains, NY) were used to acquire scapular AP tilt over the same shoulder motions. Criterion-related validity was determined using Pearson Product Moment correlations. RESULTS: Correlation analyses revealed significant moderate to good associations (r = 0.63 to 0.86, p < 0.01) between scapular AP tilt measures obtained with a digital inclinometer and an electromagnetic tracking system. CONCLUSIONS: A modified digital inclinometer is a moderately valid device to use for the quantification of scapular AP tilt. Further study is warranted to establish reliability and to validate use of the device in patients with shoulder injury or pathology. The modified inclinometer expands the clinician's ability to quantify scapular kinematic motion during the clinical evaluation and rehabilitation process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
Authors: W Ben Kibler; Tim L Uhl; Jackson W q Maddux; Paul V Brooks; Brian Zeller; John McMullen Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2002 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Perry A Koslow; Laura A Prosser; Gerrisa A Strony; Sonya L Suchecki; Gary E Mattingly Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Jason S Scibek; Amy G Mell; Brian K Downie; James E Carpenter; Richard E Hughes Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Gisele Harumi Hotta; Rafael Krasic Alaiti; Daniel Cury Ribeiro; Kevin James McQuade; Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira Journal: Arch Physiother Date: 2022-06-01