Literature DB >> 25328301

Relationship among tobacco habits, human papilloma virus (HPV) infection, p53 polymorphism/mutation and the risk of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Bidyut Chakrobarty1, Jay Gopal Roy2, Sumit Majumdar3, Divya Uppala3.   

Abstract

The prevalence of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has significantly increased over decades in several countries and human papilloma virus (HPV) has been indicated as one of the underlying causes. This suggests that HPV plays a role in the early stages of carcinogenesis but is not a requisite for the maintenance and progression of malignant state. p53 is a tumor suppressor gene that checks the cell and promotes apoptosis and cell repair that can be deactivated by mutations and a viral interaction leading to cancer and individuals with particular polymorphic variant of p53 is more susceptible to HPV-induced carcinogenesis. The present study has been carried out to detect and correlate p53 polymorphism/mutation, HPV DNA in the biopsy samples of oral cancer patients who had tobacco habits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Human papilloma virus; oral squamous cell carcinoma; p53 polymorphism/mutation

Year:  2014        PMID: 25328301      PMCID: PMC4196289          DOI: 10.4103/0973-029X.140752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol        ISSN: 0973-029X


INTRODUCTION

Oral cancer is one of the ten most common cancers in the world and is the most common cancer in the South East Asia (India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka) where it accounts for one- third of all body cancers.[1] In the oral cavity, most common malignancy is squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) representing 90-95% of all oral malignancies.[2] Mass ignorance and poverty coupled with long standing deleterious oral habits resulted in an alarming increase in the number of OSCC patients in India.[3] Annually about 2,70,000 cases of oral cancers are reported worldwide and about 82,000 of them are diagnosed in India alone.[4] In recent years, reports have emphasized the correlation between the immune status of a person and its concomitant increase in the incidence of neoplasia.[5] So far, 120 types of HPV have been identified and they are classified into high risk and low risk HPV viruses. Among the high risk, HPV-16 and HPV-18 are known to be involved in cancer cervix.[6] It has been established that HPV-16 and HPV-18 are associated with oral carcinogenesis.[7] Their genomes are integrated into the host DNA and are transcriptionally active in both tumor and tumor derived cell lines.[89] The most intensely involved gene in carcinogenesis is tumor suppressor gene called p53. The p53 locus is the most commonly mutated locus in human cancers. Located on the short arm of chromosome 17, p53 is a 393 amino acid protein that is expressed in all the tissues of the body.[10] Its biological role is to protect cells from DNA damage caused by radiation, chemical carcinogens or other mechanisms. p53 does this either by arresting the cell cycle so that DNA repair can occur or by inducing programmed cell death.[11] There has been considerable debate regarding the immortalization of kertainocytes, especially intermediate cytokeratin filaments 7 and 19, by the HPV type E7 which associates it with squamous cell carcinoma.[1213] It also seems clear that mutation of the p53 gene is one of the most common abnormalities in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN), with approximately 50% of cases associated with this mutation.[14] The aim of the present study was: Detection of HPV DNA in the biopsy samples of oral cancer patients who had tobacco habits Detection of HPV DNA in intraoral smears from tobacco using healthy controls Study of p53 polymorphism in the genomic DNA from cancer patients and healthy controls Study of p53 gene mutation in DNA extracted from the biopsy samples of cancer patients and intraoral smears from healthy controls To find out the risk of cancer due to HPV infection, p53 polymorphism and mutation at p53.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was carried out in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. Selection of subjects: Cases (cancer patients): The patients attending the Out-patient Department, during 2006-08 were examined for the presence of tobacco related oral cancer. Controls (Healthy individuals): The ‘control’ individuals, having tobacco chewing, smoking habits and corroborative age but without any oral lesions, were selected from the same hospital. Examination of patients and controls: Of all, 83 were selected as patients and 100 as controls as their habit data were available. Proper informed consents were obtained from the 83 patients and 100 controls individuals. Tobacco Habit: All patients and controls had tobacco habit. Tobacco habits were classified into three groups – Smoking tobacco (e.g. cigarettes, Bidi, Chutta etc.) Chewable tobacco (e.g. Catechu, Jarda, Gurakhu, Khaini and Snuff etc.) Mixed tobacco habits (i.e. both tobacco smoking and chewing). Unit used to express the amount of smoking tobacco is pack year (PY) (pack year = duration of habit in year X number of pack daily smoked). One pack = 20 Bidi or 10 Cigarettes. Unit used to express the amount of chewable tobacco consumed by an individual is chewing year (CY). Chewing year = Duration of habit in year X Frequency of daily intake. Blood collection: Approximately 3 ml venous blood was collected from each of the aforesaid patients and controls. Blood was mixed slowly with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for 1 min and stored at −20ºC for DNA isolation and subsequent procedure. Biopsy procedure: Biopsy done at the representative site of the lesion from all the aforesaid patients. The tissue was immediately fixed and used to confirm the histopathological diagnosis of OSCC. Genomic DNA was isolated using QIAamp DNA isolation kit (Qiagen GmbH, Germany) from blood, exfoliated cells from oral cavity of controls and processed tissues of cancer patients. Genotyping at codon 72 (Arg/Pro) polymorphism of p53: (1) Polymerase chain reaction (PCR): The double-stranded DNA was dissociated into single-stranded DNA at a denaturing temperature of 94ºC for 5 minutes and then for 30 seconds. The cycle was repeated 30 times, which increased the amount of target DNA exponentially. Primer sequences (p53 codon 72) at exon 4 Forward Primer: 5′-TTTTCACCCATCTACAGTCCCCCTTG-3′ Reverse Primer: 5′- TAGGAGCTGCTGGTGCAGGGGCCCCG-3′ (3) Mutation detection at p53 (exon4-exon9): Mutation at p53 gene was checked by DNA sequencing of the PCR products using ABI - 3100 automated DNA sequencer. Primer sequences for p53 sequencing: P53 exon 5-6 F: 5′ -TGTTCACTTGTGCCCTGACT-3′ [Figure 1].
Figure 1

DNA bands after digestion: 135 and 27 base pairs of pro and uncut 162 base pairs for Arg

DNA bands after digestion: 135 and 27 base pairs of pro and uncut 162 base pairs for Arg

Screening of HPV

Detection of HPV-16 and HPV-18: Initially, part of the β-globin gene was amplified to check the presence and integrity of the DNA in the samples (Tachezy et al., 1999).[15] The presence of HPV in the cancer tissues was detected by PCR using primers (MY09 and MY11) from the consensus L1 region. Detection of HPV16 and 18 in the L1 positive samples were carried out in separate tubes using type specific primers (HPV16: TCAAAAGCCACTGTGTCCTG and CGTGTTCTTGATGATCTGCA; HPV18: ACCTTAATGAA AAACCACGA and CGTCGTTGGAGTCGTTCCTG) [Figure 2] homologous to a region of the E6 gene (Haraf et al., 1996).[16] For final confirmation of the HPV types, the PCR products were transferred from agarose gel to Gene Screen nylon membrane for southern hybridization with [32P] labeled HPV type specific probes.
Figure 2

DNA bands after digestion: 81and 39bp for HPV 16; 51 and 49 bp for HPV 18

DNA bands after digestion: 81and 39bp for HPV 16; 51 and 49 bp for HPV 18

Statistical tests

Chi square test, Odds Ratio (OR) and its confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS

All the patients and controls were living in and around the city located in the eastern region of India. None of the patients and controls were exposed to specific occupational or environmental carcinogens and so environmental effects, other than tobacco use were similar. A total of 83 cancer patients and 100 controls were included in our study. Distribution of age, sex and tobacco habits in patients and controls were shown in Table 1. Numbers of smokers were significantly less (P < 0.0001) in cancer patients than control groups. Numbers of smokeless tobacco users were significantly more in cancer patients (P = 0.005). But, the numbers of mixed habitués were similar in two groups. Mean smoking and smokeless tobacco doses were significantly different in patients and controls.
Table 1

Demography and tobacco exposure of cancer patients and controls

Demography and tobacco exposure of cancer patients and controls Restriction length polymorphism was observed after digestion with Sma I enzyme using Agarose gel electrophoresis. The length of the PCR product was 162 base pairs. In the case of pro/pro genotype, the PCR product DNA was cut at 135 and 27 base pairs. In the case of pro/arg genotype, pro allele containing DNA was cut at 135 and 27 base pairs and the other allele remained uncut (i.e. 175 bp). In the case of arg/arg genotype, the PCR product DNA remained uncut (i.e. 175 bp). Genotyping at codon 72 at p53 was done by PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). But, 10% of the PCR products were re-sequenced to confirm the genotypes at this locus. The re-sequencing results matched exactly with the genotype data from PCR RFLP analysis. No significant association between codon 72 polymorphism and cancer was observed [Table 2]. It is observed that HPV infection was associated with increased risk of cancer (OR = 5.5, 95%, CI = 1.6-1.9) [Table 3].
Table 2

Distribution of genotypes at p53 exon 4 among cancer patients and controls

Table 3

HPV infection status in cancer patients and control

Distribution of genotypes at p53 exon 4 among cancer patients and controls HPV infection status in cancer patients and control Histopathologically, all malignancies were diagnosed as Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) and morphologically they were well (79% and 67%), moderately (18% and 29%) and poorly differentiated (3% and 4%) carcinoma in HPV infected and non-infected tumors, respectively [Table 4]. Table 5 shows the tobacco habits of the HPV infected samples in cancer and controls, 26% of the 38 cancer were found to be smokers, 42% were smokeless tobacco chewers and 32% had mixed habits. Whereas 35% of the 23 controls were smokers, 39% were smokeless tobacco chewers and 26% had mixed habits. The presence of p53 mutation in cancer and control patients is highlighted in Table 6. Five mutations in p53 gene were detected in cancer tissue DNA samples and the changes are: C > T (Arg > Cys), C > T (Arg > Trp) and C > T (Arg > stop) at exon 8, G > A (Arg > His) at exon 5 and C > T at intron 9.
Table 4

Histopathological findings in HPV infected cancer samples N=38%

Table 5

Tobacco habits in HPV infected samples

Table 6

Presence of Mutation in P53 Gene among cancer and controls

Histopathological findings in HPV infected cancer samples N=38% Tobacco habits in HPV infected samples Presence of Mutation in P53 Gene among cancer and controls

DISCUSSION

Recently developed molecular biology techniques have allowed investigators to identify human papilloma virus oral cancer precisely (Greer et al., 1989, Kashima et al., 1990).[1718] It is, nevertheless, very significant that HPV type 16, a type demonstrated in oral carcinomas, has been shown to induce dysplasia in squamous epithelium in an otherwise sterile in vitro environment (McCance et al., 1988).[19] Enormous ranges of detection rates have been reported, ranging from 0% to 81% (Scully et al., 2002, Bouda et al., 2000, Sugiyama et al., 2003).[202122] Terai et al. pointed out that the rate depends on a number of factors including the source of the specimen, the detection method and the number of subjects and their ages. They found HPV in 30 out of their 37 specimens (Terai et al., 2002, Sugiyama et al., 2003).[2223] Review of literature exhibits a wide range of p53 alterations in head and neck tumors from 33-76% (Kozomora et al., 2005, Wilson et al., 1995, Chomchai et al., 1999).[242526] As in other cancers, the p53 mutations show overexpression in most of the cases and it is the mutated form rather than the wild type gene, which is overexpressed. However, in some cases it is possible to observe overexpression but not to find mutation in the gene (Taylor et al. 1990, Patridge et al., 1999, Donna et al., 2002).[272829] The mutation is often observed as an abnormal expression of the gene since immuno-cytochemical staining can detect p53 readily in many oral cancers but not in normal tissues (Ravi et al., 1996, Ogden et al., 1992, Donna et al., 2002).[293031] In an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), multicentric study conducted by Min Dai et al., the results showed an inverse association between the presence of p53 mutations and HPV 16 infections in tissue specimens from cancers of the oral cavity and oropharynx (Min Dai et al., 2004).[32] The biological connection between HPV and p53 proteins has already been established by the fact that viral E6 protein can inactivate wild type p53 protein (Munger et al., 2002, Kozomora et al., 2005).[3334] Therefore, it is questionable whether a mutated p53 gene can significantly influence the prognosis of patients already affected with HPV. Patients with HPV infection plus p53 mutation had the worst prognosis. Other authors have also studied the relationship between HPV infection and mutation of the p53 gene concerning prognosis of tumor patients. The biochemical and biological activities of p53 that are affected by codon 72 polymorphism have been evaluated in a series of studies. It was first shown that this polymorphism had a profound effect on the primary structure of p53 (Mitra et al., 2005). More recently, it has been shown that the ability of p53 to interact with the TFID associated factors is much stronger for Pro-72 associated form than for Arg-72 form whereas Pro-72 form has increased transcription transactivation capacity (Mitra et al., 2005, Marin et al., 2000).[3536] In contrast, analysis of the ability of the two polymorphic varieties to induce apoptosis suggests that the two polymorphic varieties though differing in kinetics are capable of inducing equal level of apoptosis (Mitra et al., 2005, Marin et al., 2000).[1933] Recent studies using temperature sensitive form of p53 protein further supports these observations and shows that the Arg-72 form has a much more stronger capacity to induce apoptosis than the Pro-72 form of p53 in tumor cells but not in normal cells (Mitra et al., 2005, Dumont et al., 2003);[3237] however, in primary head and neck tumors, retention of the arginine allele in codon 72 of p53, correlates with poor apoptosis (Mitra et al., 2005, Schneider et al., 1986).[2033] Finally, the Pro-72 form appears to induce a higher level of G1 arrest as compared to the Arg-72 form (Mitra et al., 2005, Pim et al., 2004).[3338] In summary, it may be stated that Arg-72 form induces a lower level of G1 arrest, has reduced transcriptional transactivational capacity of downstream target genes and has a lower apoptotic potential in primary tumors as compared to the Pro-72 form. Thus, we argue that individuals with the Arg-72 form of p53 are less efficient in processing tobacco associated DNA damage signals and hence are more susceptible to develop leukoplakia (Mitra et al., 2005).[33] Tao et al. (2002)[27] conducted a study on polymorphism of p53 gene and observed that polymorphism at codon 72 of exon 4 which results in either an arginine residue (CGC) or a proline residue (CCC), modulate risk of cancer differentially. Prevalence of mutation was observed to be more in patients having increased tobacco smoking habit. The p53 gene is mutated in over one-half of oral cancers. The mutation is often observed as an abnormal expression of the gene since immuno-cytochemical staining can detect p53 readily in many oral cancers but not in normal tissues (Donna A et al., 2002).[11] The majority of the mutation was observed in the region of exons 5–8 of p53 gene. Besides this, a small percentage of p53 mutations can be found outside this region.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

The present study was undertaken with a view to assess the association among HPV infection, p53 polymorphisms, p53 mutation and the risk of development of oral cancer in patients from Kolkata. The findings thereafter were recorded carefully, analyzed and corroborated in reference to the aims and objectives of this study and the following observations and conclusions were drawn. HPV infection increases the risk of oral cancer Genotype of p53 at codon 72 did not modulate the risk of cancer Mutations at p53 gene were found in 5 of the 83 cancer and none in 100 control subjects. To detect mutations, DNA sequence from blood and tissue samples from same individuals were compared. Five mutations in TP53 gene were detected in tissue samples and the changes are: C >T (Arg > Cys), C > T (Arg > Trp) and C > T (Arg > stop) at exon 8, G > A (Arg > His) at exon 5 and C > T at intron 9.
  34 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of p53 gene mutations in laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  J S Chomchai; W Du; F H Sarkar; Y W Li; J R Jacobs; J F Ensley; W Sakr; G H Yoo
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  p53 codon 72 polymorphism (C/G) and the risk of human papillomavirus-associated carcinomas in China.

Authors:  Tao Li; Zhe-Ming Lu; Mei Guo; Qin-Jiao Wu; Ke-Neng Chen; Hai-Ping Xing; Qiang Mei; Yang Ke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Possible association between HPV16 E7 protein level and cytokeratin 19.

Authors:  Gianfranco Favia; Darja Kanduc; Lorenzo Lo Muzio; Alberta Lucchese; Rosario Serpico
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Distribution pattern of human papilloma virus 16 genome in cervical neoplasia by molecular in situ hybridization of tissue sections.

Authors:  A Schneider; T Oltersdorf; V Schneider; L Gissmann
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1987-06-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Histological and histochemical studies of oral cancer.

Authors:  N W Johnson
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Immunohistochemical detection of p53 protein accumulation in head and neck cancer: correlation with p53 gene alterations.

Authors:  D Taylor; W M Koch; M Zahurak; K Shah; D Sidransky; W H Westra
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Prognostic significance of STNMP and velocity of tumor growth in oral cancer.

Authors:  S J Evans; J D Langdon; A D Rapidis; N W Johnson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The incidence of p53 mutations increases with progression of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  J O Boyle; J Hakim; W Koch; P van der Riet; R H Hruban; R A Roa; R Correo; Y J Eby; J M Ruppert; D Sidransky
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Assessment of p53 protein expression in normal, benign, and malignant oral mucosa.

Authors:  G R Ogden; R A Kiddie; D P Lunny; D P Lane
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.996

10.  Cancer of the lip.

Authors:  G A Lynch
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1967
View more
  6 in total

1.  Human papilloma virus (HPV) infection leads to the development of head and neck lesions but offers better prognosis in malignant Indian patients.

Authors:  Shreya Sarkar; Neyaz Alam; Jayanta Chakraborty; Jaydip Biswas; Syam Sundar Mandal; Susanta Roychoudhury; Chinmay Kumar Panda
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Prevalence of Human papillomavirus (HPV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in south-eastern Poland.

Authors:  Dorota Polz-Gruszka; Kamal Morshed; Agnieszka Stec; Małgorzata Polz-Dacewicz
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.965

3.  p53 polymorphism and association of human papillomavirus in oral submucous fibrosis and oral squamous cell carcinoma: A case-control study.

Authors:  Kaveri Hallikeri; Krishna Burde; Venktesh Anehosur; Bhushan B Kulkarni; Shivaprakash V Hiremath
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2019 Jan-Apr

4.  Frequency of HPV in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Priscila Marinho de Abreu; Anna Clara Gregório Có; Pedro Leite Azevedo; Isabella Bittencourt do Valle; Karine Gadioli de Oliveira; Sônia Alves Gouvea; Melissa Freitas Cordeiro-Silva; Iúri Drummond Louro; José Roberto Vasconcelos de Podestá; Jeferson Lenzi; Agenor Sena; Elismauro Francisco Mendonça; Sandra Lúcia Ventorin von Zeidler
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Tobacco and oral squamous cell carcinoma: A review of carcinogenic pathways.

Authors:  Xiaoge Jiang; Jiaxin Wu; Jiexue Wang; Ruijie Huang
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 2.600

Review 6.  High-Risk Human Papillomavirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Coinfection: A Potential Role in Head and Neck Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Rancés Blanco; Diego Carrillo-Beltrán; Alejandro H Corvalán; Francisco Aguayo
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.