Literature DB >> 25327547

Maternal effects and population regulation: maternal density-induced reproduction suppression impairs offspring capacity in response to immediate environment in root voles Microtus oeconomus.

Jiang-Hui Bian1, Shou-Yang Du1,2, Yan Wu3, Yi-Fan Cao1, Xu-Heng Nie1,2, Hui He1,2, Zhi-Bing You4.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that maternal effects act as an adaptive bridge in translating maternal environments into offspring phenotypes, and thereby affecting population dynamics has not been studied in the well-controlled fields. In this study, the effects of maternal population density on offspring stress axis, reproduction and population dynamics were studied in root voles (Microtus oeconomus). Parental enclosures for breeding offspring were established by introducing six adults per sex into each of 4 (low density) and 30 adults per sex into each of another 4 (high density) enclosures. Live-trapping started 2 weeks after. Offspring captured at age of 20-30 days were removed to the laboratory, housed under laboratory conditions until puberty, and subsequently used to establish offspring populations in these same enclosures, after parental populations had been removed. [Correction added on 8 January 2015 after first online publication: '10-20 days' has been changed to '20-30 days.'] Offspring from each of the two parental sources were assigned into four enclosures with two for each of the two density treatments used in establishing parental populations (referred to as LL and LH for maternally unstressed offspring, assigned in low and high density, and HL and HH for maternally stressed offspring, assigned in low and high density). Faecal corticosterone metabolites (FCM) levels, offspring reproduction traits and population dynamics were tested following repeated live-trapping over two seasons. Differential fluctuations in population size were observed between maternally density-stressed and density-unstressed offspring. Populations in LL and LH groups changed significantly in responding to initial density and reached the similar levels at beginning of the second trapping season. Populations in HL and HH groups, however, were remained relatively steady, and in HL group, the low population size was sustained until end of experiment. Maternal density stress was associated with FCM elevations, reproduction suppression and body mass decrease at sexual maturity in offspring. The FCM elevations and reproduction suppression were independent of offspring population density and correlated with decreased offspring quality. These findings indicate that intrinsic state alterations induced by maternal stress impair offspring capacity in response to immediate environment, and these alterations are likely mediated by maternal stress system. The maladaptive reproduction suppression seen in HL group suggests intrinsic population density as one of ecological factors generating delayed density-dependent effects.
© 2014 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2014 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ecological stressor; environmental mismatch; glucocorticoid metabolites; maternal matching; none‐genetic phenotypic effects; population self‐regulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25327547     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  14 in total

1.  High Arctic lemmings remain reproductively active under predator-induced elevated stress.

Authors:  Dominique Fauteux; Gilles Gauthier; Dominique Berteaux; Rupert Palme; Rudy Boonstra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Borrelia afzelii alters reproductive success in a rodent host.

Authors:  Claire Cayol; Anna Giermek; Andrea Gomez-Chamorro; Jukka Hytönen; Eva Riikka Kallio; Tapio Mappes; Jemiina Salo; Maarten Jeroen Voordouw; Esa Koskela
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Integrating Ecological and Evolutionary Context in the Study of Maternal Stress.

Authors:  Michael J Sheriff; Alison Bell; Rudy Boonstra; Ben Dantzer; Sophia G Lavergne; Katie E McGhee; Kirsty J MacLeod; Laurane Winandy; Cedric Zimmer; Oliver P Love
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.326

4.  Stickleback embryos use ATP-binding cassette transporters as a buffer against exposure to maternally derived cortisol.

Authors:  Ryan T Paitz; Syed Abbas Bukhari; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The synergistic effect of density stress during the maternal period and adulthood on immune traits of root vole (Microtus oeconomus) individuals-a field experiment.

Authors:  Shou-Yang Du; Yi-Fan Cao; Xu-Heng Nie; Yan Wu; Jiang-Hui Bian
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Sex ratio in the mother's environment affects offspring population dynamics: maternal effects on population regulation.

Authors:  Wenjie Li; Cuijuan Niu; Shijun Bian
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Density-dependent demography and movements in a cyclic brown lemming population.

Authors:  Dominique Fauteux; Gilles Gauthier
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Differential antipredatory responses in the tuco-tuco (Ctenomys talarum) in relation to endogenous and exogenous changes in glucocorticoids.

Authors:  Valentina Brachetta; Cristian E Schleich; Roxana R Zenuto
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Does the early social environment prepare individuals for the future? A match-mismatch experiment in female wild cavies.

Authors:  Susanne Sangenstedt; Carsten Szardenings; Norbert Sachser; Sylvia Kaiser
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Improved nutrition cues switch from efficiency to luxury phenotypes for a long-lived ungulate.

Authors:  Eric S Michel; Emily B Flinn; Stephen Demarais; Bronson K Strickland; Guiming Wang; Chad M Dacus
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.