OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper is to assess the usefulness of measuring serum levels of adalimumab (ADL) and anti-ADL antibodies in 57 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with ADL for at least 3 months in daily practice. METHODS: All patients received concomitant disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to obtain the cut-off value of ADL for low disease activity (DAS28-ESR ≤3.2). RESULTS: Anti-ADL antibodies were detected in 4 (7%) patients with a mean (SD) DAS28 score of 4.6 (0.9). Patients with positive anti-ADL antibodies had significantly lower levels of ADL and higher DAS28 scores than those with negative antibodies. Patients with DAS28 ≤3.2 as compared with patients with DAS28 >3.2 showed significantly better SDAI score, higher serum concentrations of ADL and none of them showed anti-ADL antibodies. The cut-off of serum level of ADL for DAS28 <3.2 was 4.3 mg/L. According to serum levels of ADL, patients were grouped into group 1 (low level) <5.5 mg/L, group 2 (medium level) 5.5-11.3 mg/L and group 3 (high level) >11.3 mg/L. Patients in the medium group were closed to clinical remission (median DAS28 2.7) and patients in the high group were on clinical remission (DAS28 2.1). CONCLUSIONS: Serum levels of ADL should be maintained >4.3 mg/L. In patients with ADL levels >11.3 mg/L, a decrease of the dose of ADL or an increase in the interval between doses may be planned. The presence of anti-ADL antibodies was associated with a loss of clinical efficacy of ADL.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper is to assess the usefulness of measuring serum levels of adalimumab (ADL) and anti-ADL antibodies in 57 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with ADL for at least 3 months in daily practice. METHODS: All patients received concomitant disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to obtain the cut-off value of ADL for low disease activity (DAS28-ESR ≤3.2). RESULTS: Anti-ADL antibodies were detected in 4 (7%) patients with a mean (SD) DAS28 score of 4.6 (0.9). Patients with positive anti-ADL antibodies had significantly lower levels of ADL and higher DAS28 scores than those with negative antibodies. Patients with DAS28 ≤3.2 as compared with patients with DAS28 >3.2 showed significantly better SDAI score, higher serum concentrations of ADL and none of them showed anti-ADL antibodies. The cut-off of serum level of ADL for DAS28 <3.2 was 4.3 mg/L. According to serum levels of ADL, patients were grouped into group 1 (low level) <5.5 mg/L, group 2 (medium level) 5.5-11.3 mg/L and group 3 (high level) >11.3 mg/L. Patients in the medium group were closed to clinical remission (median DAS28 2.7) and patients in the high group were on clinical remission (DAS28 2.1). CONCLUSIONS: Serum levels of ADL should be maintained >4.3 mg/L. In patients with ADL levels >11.3 mg/L, a decrease of the dose of ADL or an increase in the interval between doses may be planned. The presence of anti-ADL antibodies was associated with a loss of clinical efficacy of ADL.
Authors: José Miguel Senabre Gallego; Jose Rosas; Mariana Marco-Mingot; José Alberto García-Gómez; Gregorio Santos-Soler; Esteban Salas-Heredia; Ana Pons-Bas; Xavier Barber-Vallés; José Antonio Bernal-Vidal; Catalina Cano-Pérez; Mario García-Carrasco; Emilio Flores-Pardo Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Charlotte Krieckaert; Borja Hernández-Breijo; Johanna Elin Gehin; Guillaume le Mélédo; Alejandro Balsa; Meghna Jani; Denis Mulleman; Victoria Navarro-Compan; Gertjan Wolbink; John Isaac; Astrid van Tubergen Journal: RMD Open Date: 2022-06