William A Satariano1, Melissa Kealey2, Alan Hubbard2, Elaine Kurtovich2, Susan L Ivey2, Constance M Bayles3, Rebecca H Hunter4, Thomas R Prohaska5. 1. School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley. bills@berkeley.edu. 2. School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley. 3. Center for Social and Urban Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 5. College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Mobility disability is associated with poor lower body function among older adults. This study examines whether specific types of neighborhood characteristics moderate that association. DESIGN AND METHODS: This study is based on a cross-sectional sample of 884 people aged ≥ 65 years identified through service organizations in Alameda County, CA; Cook County, IL; Allegheny County, PA; and Wake and Durham counties, NC. In-person interviews focus on neighborhood characteristics, physical and cognitive function, depression, and walking. Functional capacity is tested using objective measures of lower body strength, balance, and walking speed. Mobility disability, the main study outcome, is measured as self-reported level of difficulty in walking 2-3 neighborhood blocks. Estimates of main and interactive effects are derived from logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among older adults with poor lower body function, those who report less proximity to goods and services and barriers to walking report more mobility disability than other older adults. In contrast, among older adults with good lower body function, there is a low prevalence of mobility disability and little association between perceptions of the neighborhood and mobility disability. IMPLICATIONS: In addition to more refined longitudinal studies, this research provides a foundation for innovative place-based rehabilitation and hospital discharge programs for older adults newly diagnosed and treated for chronic health conditions.
PURPOSE:Mobility disability is associated with poor lower body function among older adults. This study examines whether specific types of neighborhood characteristics moderate that association. DESIGN AND METHODS: This study is based on a cross-sectional sample of 884 people aged ≥ 65 years identified through service organizations in Alameda County, CA; Cook County, IL; Allegheny County, PA; and Wake and Durham counties, NC. In-person interviews focus on neighborhood characteristics, physical and cognitive function, depression, and walking. Functional capacity is tested using objective measures of lower body strength, balance, and walking speed. Mobility disability, the main study outcome, is measured as self-reported level of difficulty in walking 2-3 neighborhood blocks. Estimates of main and interactive effects are derived from logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among older adults with poor lower body function, those who report less proximity to goods and services and barriers to walking report more mobility disability than other older adults. In contrast, among older adults with good lower body function, there is a low prevalence of mobility disability and little association between perceptions of the neighborhood and mobility disability. IMPLICATIONS: In addition to more refined longitudinal studies, this research provides a foundation for innovative place-based rehabilitation and hospital discharge programs for older adults newly diagnosed and treated for chronic health conditions.
Authors: William A Satariano; Jack M Guralnik; Richard J Jackson; Richard A Marottoli; Elizabeth A Phelan; Thomas R Prohaska Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-06-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Philippa Clarke; Jennifer A Ailshire; Michael Bader; Jeffrey D Morenoff; James S House Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-07-30 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Cheryl R Clark; Ichiro Kawachi; Louise Ryan; Karen Ertel; Martha E Fay; Lisa F Berkman Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-05-28 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Milena Kostadinovic; Dejan Nikolic; Ivana Petronic; Dragana Cirovic; Mirko Grajic; Milena Santric Milicevic Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-12-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Carla Guerreiro; Marta Botelho; Elia Fernández-Martínez; Ana Marreiros; Sandra Pais Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 3.390