Literature DB >> 25325682

Self-expandable metal stents for obstructing colonic and extracolonic cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline.

Jeanin E van Hooft1, Emo E van Halsema1, Geoffroy Vanbiervliet2, Regina G H Beets-Tan3, John M DeWitt4, Fergal Donnellan5, Jean-Marc Dumonceau6, Robert G T Glynne-Jones7, Cesare Hassan8, Javier Jiménez-Perez9, Søren Meisner10, V Raman Muthusamy11, Michael C Parker12, Jean-Marc Regimbeau13, Charles Sabbagh13, Jayesh Sagar14, Pieter J Tanis15, Jo Vandervoort16, George J Webster17, Gianpiero Manes18, Marc A Barthet19, Alessandro Repici20.   

Abstract

This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). This Guideline was also reviewed and endorsed by the Governing Board of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. Main recommendations The following recommendations should only be applied after a thorough diagnostic evaluation including a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan. 1 Prophylactic colonic stent placement is not recommended. Colonic stenting should be reserved for patients with clinical symptoms and imaging evidence of malignant large-bowel obstruction, without signs of perforation (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). 2 Colonic self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement as a bridge to elective surgery is not recommended as a standard treatment of symptomatic left-sided malignant colonic obstruction (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). 3 For patients with potentially curable but obstructing left-sided colonic cancer, stent placement may be considered as an alternative to emergency surgery in those who have an increased risk of postoperative mortality, I. e. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status ≥ III and/or age > 70 years (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). 4 SEMS placement is recommended as the preferred treatment for palliation of malignant colonic obstruction (strong recommendation, high quality evidence), except in patients treated or considered for treatment with antiangiogenic drugs (e. g. bevacizumab) (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25325682     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  80 in total

Review 1.  Long-term outcomes after stenting as a "bridge to surgery" for the management of acute obstruction secondary to colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Javier Suárez; Javier Jimenez-Pérez
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-01-15

2.  Self-expandable Metal Stent as a Bridge to Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Safety and Oncological Outcomes.

Authors:  Marie Hanaoka; Taichi Ogo; Yudai Kawamura; Tomiyuki Miura; Tomoki Aburatani; Hitoshi Sugimoto; Naoaki Hoshino; Tsunehito Yauchi; Yoshinobu Nishioka; Tatsuyuki Kawano
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Colonic perforation either during or after stent insertion as a bridge to surgery for malignant colorectal obstruction increases the risk of peritoneal seeding.

Authors:  Su Jin Kim; Hyung Wook Kim; Su Bum Park; Dae Hwan Kang; Cheol Woong Choi; Byeong Jun Song; Joung Boom Hong; Dong Jun Kim; Byung Soo Park; Gyung Mo Son
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic assisted insertion of a colonic self-expandable metallic stent.

Authors:  Y M Ho; V Shenoy; J Alberts; N Ward
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Current status of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the emergency setting.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Alberto Arezzo; Marco Ettore Allaix; Simone Arolfo; Gabriele Anania
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-03-25

Review 6.  Update on Enteral Stents.

Authors:  Emanuele Dabizzi; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06

7.  SEMS for Palliation of Malignant Colonic Obstruction: Why SEMi Available Is Not Good Enough.

Authors:  Christian P Selinger
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Impact of endoscopic stent insertion on detection of viable circulating tumor cells from obstructive colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shinya Yamashita; Masahiro Tanemura; Genta Sawada; Jeongho Moon; Yosuke Shimizu; Toshiki Yamaguchi; Toshio Kuwai; Yasuo Urata; Kazuya Kuraoka; Nobutaka Hatanaka; Yoshinori Yamashita; Kiyomi Taniyama
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Self-expanding metal stenting for obstructing left colon cancer: A district hospital experience.

Authors:  Mohan Raj Harilingam; Amjad Khushal; Abdulmalik Aikoye
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-23

10.  Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Utilization of Colorectal Stents for the Treatment of Malignant Bowel Obstruction.

Authors:  Philip N Okafor; Derrick J Stobaugh; Louis M Wong Kee Song; Paul J Limburg; Jayant A Talwalkar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.