| Literature DB >> 25325055 |
Alfredo Ambrosone1, Maria Rosaria Scotto di Vettimo1, Maria Ada Malvindi2, Modi Roopin3, Oren Levy3, Valentina Marchesano1, Pier Paolo Pompa2, Claudia Tortiglione1, Angela Tino1.
Abstract
It is generally accepted that silica (SiO2) is not toxic. But the increasing use of silica nanoparticles (SiO2NPs) in many different industrial fields has prompted the careful investigation of their toxicity in biological systems. In this report, we describe the effects elicited by SiO2NPs on animal and cell physiology. Stable and monodisperse amorphous silica nanoparticles, 25 nM in diameter, were administered to living Hydra vulgaris (Cnidaria). The dose-related effects were defined by morphological and behavioral assays. The results revealed an all-or-nothing lethal toxicity with a rather high threshold (35 nM NPs) and a LT50 of 38 h. At sub lethal doses, the morphophysiological effects included: animal morphology alterations, paralysis of the gastric region, disorganization and depletion of tentacle specialized cells, increase of apoptotic and collapsed cells, and reduction of the epithelial cell proliferation rate. Transcriptome analysis (RNAseq) revealed 45 differentially expressed genes, mostly involved in stress response and cuticle renovation. Our results show that Hydra reacts to SiO2NPs, is able to rebalance the animal homeostasis up to a relatively high doses of SiO2NPs, and that the physiological modifications are transduced to gene expression modulation.Entities:
Keywords: GSH response; Hydra; RNAseq; amorphous silica nanoparticles; extracellular matrix homeostasis; nanotoxicity
Year: 2014 PMID: 25325055 PMCID: PMC4179610 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2014.00037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Description of morphological traits and vital states of SiO.
| Score | Morphology | Vital state |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Normal hydra | Active |
| 6 | Bumped gastric region, normal tentacles | Active |
| 5 | Inverted-cone gastric region; shortened tentacles | Whitening, gastric region paralyzed, slow tentacles |
| 4 | Inverted-cone gastric region, short tentacles | Paralyzed, rigid tentacles |
| 3 | Gastric region reduced in size, crushed tentacles | Permanently damaged to death |
| 2 | Further reduced gastric region, without tentacles | Abundant cell loss |
| 1 | Irregular shape | Death |
| 0 | Dispersed cell clumps and debris | Disintegrated |
Figure 1Effects SiO. Representative in vivo images of major features of morphological alterations (see Table 1) induced by continuous exposure to SiO2NPs are reported into the figures. Bar in (A–E), 1 mm; in (F,G), 0.5 mm.
Figure 2Dose response effects of SiO. Median scores were obtained from groups of 20 Hydra incubated for 24, 44, and 50 h with increasing concentrations of SiO2NPs from 10 to 50 nM.
Figure 3Effects of SiO. Nematocytes, packed into tentacle battery cell complexes, were stained with toluidine blue. Battery cell complexes distribution in normal tentacles (A,D). Distribution of battery cell complexes in animals treated 24 h with 25 nM SiO2NPs (B,E). The abnormal distribution of the complexes is recovered within 48 h from stimulus removal as shown in (C,F). Effects of SiO2NPs on battery cell morphology cell. Isolated normal battery cell complex (G), battery cell complex from treated animal (H). (I) Quantitative estimation of the aberrant battery cells. The graph represents the percentage of collapsed battery cell complexes (red bar) at 10 and 25 nM SiO2NPs after 24 h incubation compared to control relative to a sample of 100 battery cells complexes; data are means of three independent experiments; vertical bars indicate the standard deviation. In (G–I), either treated and control animals were macerated and the nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Bar in (A–C) 200 μm; (D–H) 50 μm.
Figure 4Effects of SiO. Forty eight-hours-regenerating Hydra treated with 25 nM SiO2NPs (A); 48 h-regenerating Hydra treated with 10 nM SiO2NPs (B); untreated 48 h-regenerating Hydra (C). In (D), the histogram shows the distribution of polyps developmental stages; stage 0 indicates absence of tentacles; stage 1 indicates the presence of tentacle buds; stage 2 indicates new emerging tentacles. Animals treated with 25 nM SiO2NPs are significantly impaired in the regeneration process. Data are means of three independent experiments. Twenty-five animals for each experiment were employed. Bar (A–C), 1 mm.
Figure 5Living . Fluorescent microscopy in vivo images of gastric region (A) and tentacles (B); the insets are the corresponding bright field images. Localization of SiO2NPs on cell maceration of Hydra treated as above; epitheliomuscolar cell (C); battery cell complex (D). Nuclei are contrasted with DAPI; SiO2NPs/rhodamine (arrowed red spot) localize in the apical part of epithelial cell (C) or tied into the nematocytes inserted into the battery cell complex (D). (C,D) Phase contrast, DAPI, and rhodamine triple merged images. Bar in (A,B) 100 μm; in (C,D) 25 μm.
Content of Si (element) in treated .
| SiO2NPs (nM) | Hydra | Medium |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 52.3 ± 3.6 | 272.7 ± 28.5 |
| 25 | 41.7 ± 0.8 | 614.6 ± 17.8 |
Figure 6Effect of SiO. (A,B) Cellular assessment of apoptosis induction by SiO2NPs. Following 24 h in 25 nM SiO2NPs, polyps were macerated and the percentage of apoptotic cells was determined by counting the DAPI-stained fragmented nuclei [arrow in (A)]. Scale bar: 50 μm. Inset in (A): phase contrast–DAPI merged of the same image. The arrow in the inset shows a pyknotic nucleus. The graph in (B) shows the percentage of total pyknotic nuclei and phagocytic moiety in normal and treated conditions. Cell cycling activity of interstitial stem cells (i-cells) (C) and of epithelial cells (EPI) (D) were estimated in untreated and 25 nM SiO2NPs treated animals by continuous incubation with BrdU, followed by maceration of 10 animals at the indicated time points followed by colorimetric immunostaining. SiO2NPs impaired the proliferating activity of epithelial, as shown by the lower percentage of BrdU labeled nuclei. In (B–D) data represent mean ± SD of three independent experiments; 100 cells were counted for each experiment.
Figure 7Effect of SiO. Hydra population growth test. The graph shows n/n0 values at each time point. Where n is the total number of polyps, and n0 is the number of founder polyps.
The table reports the RNAseq results for DE genes with fold changes above 2 (upregulated genes).
| Sequence name | Annotation | Fold change |
|---|---|---|
| ENA|HAAC01032462|HAAC01032462.1 | Pg1 homology to homo sapiens | 25.26 |
| ENA|HAAC01025529|HAAC01025529.1 | Protein | 14.03 |
| ENA|HAAC01028000|HAAC01028000.1 | Orf16–lacz fusion protein | 14.03 |
| ENA|HAAC01044255|HAAC01044255.1 | 60s ribosomal protein l18 | 12.21 |
| ENA|HAAC01033821|HAAC01033821.1 | Conserved protein | 6.40 |
| ENA|HAAC01033389|HAAC01033389.1 | Glycosyl transferase (glycosyl transferase family 2) | 6.31 |
| ENA|HAAC01044227|HAAC01044227.1 | Elongation factor 1-gamma | 5.19 |
| ENA|HAAC01028897|HAAC01028897.1 | Pg1 homology to homo sapiens | 5.05 |
| ENA|HAAC01042994|HAAC01042994.1 | Guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit beta-2-like 1 | 4.75 |
| ENA|HAAC01042461|HAAC01042461.1 | Aminopeptidase n | 4.42 |
| ENA|HAAC01039586|HAAC01039586.1 | Conserved protein | 4.35 |
| ENA|HAAC01018639|HAAC01018639.1 | Conserved protein | 4.33 |
| ENA|HAAC01031633|HAAC01031633.1 | Ascorbate peroxidase-like | 4.04 |
| ENA|HAAC01030032|HAAC01030032.1 | Conserved protein | 4.03 |
| ENA|HAAC01029942|HAAC01029942.1 | Ribosomal protein l44 | 3.95 |
| ENA|HAAC01044395|HAAC01044395.1 | 40s ribosomal protein s4 | 3.72 |
| ENA|HAAC01044240|HAAC01044240.1 | Predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100207688 | 3.71 |
| ENA|HAAC01044744|HAAC01044744.1 | Arminin-like peptide 27077 | 3.70 |
| ENA|HAAC01043749|HAAC01043749.1 | Predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100211198 | 3.65 |
| ENA|HAAC01044188|HAAC01044188.1 | Predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100207688 | 3.60 |
| ENA|HAAC01032676|HAAC01032676.1 | Predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100200837 | 3.56 |
| ENA|HAAC01017557|HAAC01017557.1 | Ascorbate peroxidase-like | 3.19 |
| ENA|HAAC01043858|HAAC01043858.1 | Lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein 2-like | 3.11 |
| ENA|HAAC01000451|HAAC01000451.1 | Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-binding prot 1 isoform x3 | 3.07 |
| ENA|HAAC01043989|HAAC01043989.1 | Predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100207688 | 3.00 |
| ENA|HAAC01044084|HAAC01044084.1 | Predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100203182 | 2.91 |
| ENA|HAAC01022047|HAAC01022047.1 | Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme e2 g2 | 2.90 |
| ENA|HAAC01045088|HAAC01045088.1 | tpa_exp: minicollagen 7 | 2.85 |
| ENA|HAAC01012792|HAAC01012792.1 | 60 kDa lysophospholipase | 2.34 |
The sequence names are referred to the deposited .
The table reports the RNAseq results for DE genes with fold changes below 0.5 (downregulated genes).
| Sequence Name | Annotation | Fold change |
|---|---|---|
| ENA|HAAC01029048|HAAC01029048.1 | Rhamnose-binding lectin-like | 0.44 |
| ENA|HAAC01040476|HAAC01040476.1 | Heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein isoform x2 | 0.41 |
| ENA|HAAC01005216|HAAC01005216.1 | Gtp-binding protein rhes-like | 0.40 |
| ENA|HAAC01044402|HAAC01044402.1 | Ppod1 peroxidase | 0.39 |
| ENA|HAAC01043441|HAAC01043441.1 | Heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein | 0.38 |
| ENA|HAAC01003999|HAAC01003999.1 | Predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC101235185 | 0.37 |
| ENA|HAAC01019715|HAAC01019715.1 | Hsp16.2 | 0.34 |
| ENA|HAAC01029657|HAAC01029657.1 | Heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein | 0.33 |
| ENA|HAAC01043390|HAAC01043390.1 | Ppod2 | 0.30 |
| ENA|HAAC01031772|HAAC01031772.1 | DNAj homolog subfamily b member 4 | 0.30 |
| ENA|HAAC01018572|HAAC01018572.1 | Hsp16.2 | 0.28 |
| ENA|HAAC01009426|HAAC01009426.1 | Hypothetical protein DAPPUDRAFT_322288 | 0.27 |
| ENA|HAAC01024155|HAAC01024155.1 | Bag family molecular chaperone regulator 3-like | 0.27 |
| ENA|HAAC01031161|HAAC01031161.1 | Family 2 glycosyl transferase | 0.25 |
| ENA|HAAC01028344|HAAC01028344.1 | Predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100203540 | 0.23 |
| ENA|HAAC01027133|HAAC01027133.1 | Hsp-16.2 | 0.18 |
The sequence names are referred to the deposited .
Figure 8RNAseq results validation by qRT-PCR. Relative expression levels of three selected genes are reported. Data represent mean ± SD of three technical repeats from three biological replicates.