Literature DB >> 25324419

Mutant prevention concentration of tigecycline for clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus.

C K Hesje1, K Drlica2, J M Blondeau3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mutant prevention concentration (MPC) reflects the antimicrobial susceptibility of the resistant mutant subpopulations present in large bacterial populations. In principle, combining the MPC with pharmacokinetic measurements can guide treatment to restrict the enrichment of resistant subpopulations, just as the MIC is used with pharmacokinetics to restrict the growth of bulk, susceptible populations. Little is known about the MPC of tigecycline, one of the more recently approved antimicrobials. Tigecycline is particularly interesting because it shows good activity against Gram-positive pathogens.
METHODS: MPCs were determined using tigecycline-containing agar plates for clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=47), MRSA (n=50) and MSSA (n=50).
RESULTS: Trypticase soy agar containing sheep red blood cells, commonly used for the growth of S. pneumoniae, gave tigecycline MPC90 values that were two orders of magnitude higher than expected. The addition of agar to Todd-Hewitt broth (solidified Todd-Hewitt broth) allowed the high-density growth of S. pneumoniae in the absence of red blood cells and lowered the MPC90 of tigecycline by 100-fold to 0.5 mg/L. The addition of red blood cells to solidified Todd-Hewitt broth raised the MPC90 by 100-fold. Thus, red blood cells reduce the efficacy of tigecycline against S. pneumoniae. The growth of Staphylococcus aureus was not sensitive to red blood cells; values of MPC90 were 2 and 4 mg/L for MSSA and MRSA, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Values of MPC constitute a concentration threshold for restricting the emergence of tigecycline resistance that can now be used in animal studies to determine pharmacodynamic thresholds. The off-label treatment of S. pneumoniae blood infections with tigecycline may require caution due to blood-cell-mediated interference with the antimicrobial.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood agar; mutant selection window; resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25324419      PMCID: PMC4291236          DOI: 10.1093/jac/dku389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  16 in total

1.  Mutant prevention concentrations of fluoroquinolones for clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  J M Blondeau; X Zhao; G Hansen; K Drlica
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pharmacological and patient-specific response determinants in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia treated with tigecycline.

Authors:  Sujata M Bhavnani; Christopher M Rubino; Jeffrey P Hammel; Alan Forrest; Nathalie Dartois; C Angel Cooper; Joan Korth-Bradley; Paul G Ambrose
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In vivo emergence of tigecycline resistance in multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Teresa Spanu; Giulia De Angelis; Michela Cipriani; Barbara Pedruzzi; Tiziana D'Inzeo; Maria Adriana Cataldo; Gabriele Sganga; Evelina Tacconelli
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Nested case-control study of the emergence of tigecycline resistance in multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  Masayuki Nigo; Catalina Salinas Cevallos; Krystina Woods; Vicente Maco Flores; Gweneth Francis; David C Perlman; Manuel Revuelta; Donna Mildvan; Mary Waldron; Tessa Gomez; Sanjana Koshy; Tomasz Jodlowski; William Riley; Jörg J Ruhe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Mutant prevention concentration of tigecycline for carbapenem-susceptible and -resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Jun-Chang Cui; You-Ning Liu; Liang-An Chen
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  Tigecycline.

Authors:  George A Pankey
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Minimal inhibitory and mutant prevention concentrations of azithromycin, clarithromycin and erythromycin for clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Kelli Metzler; Karl Drlica; Joseph M Blondeau
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 8.  Restricting the selection of antibiotic-resistant mutants: a general strategy derived from fluoroquinolone studies.

Authors:  X Zhao; K Drlica
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 9.  Tigecycline: an update.

Authors:  Gary E Stein; Timothy Babinchak
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 10.  The emergence of clinical resistance to tigecycline.

Authors:  Yan Sun; Yun Cai; Xu Liu; Nan Bai; Beibei Liang; Rui Wang
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 5.283

View more
  4 in total

1.  Validation of the mutant selection window hypothesis with fosfomycin against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an in vitro and in vivo comparative study.

Authors:  Ai-Jun Pan; Qing Mei; Ying Ye; Hong-Ru Li; Bao Liu; Jia-Bin Li
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Beyond dose: Pulsed antibiotic treatment schedules can maintain individual benefit while reducing resistance.

Authors:  Christopher M Baker; Matthew J Ferrari; Katriona Shea
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Mutant prevention and minimum inhibitory concentration drug values for enrofloxacin, ceftiofur, florfenicol, tilmicosin and tulathromycin tested against swine pathogens Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Pasteurella multocida and Streptococcus suis.

Authors:  Joseph M Blondeau; Shantelle D Fitch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Nisin Influence on the Antimicrobial Resistance Ability of Canine Oral Enterococci.

Authors:  Eva Cunha; Rita Janela; Margarida Costa; Luís Tavares; Ana Salomé Veiga; Manuela Oliveira
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.