Literature DB >> 25323883

Autophagy activity in pulmonary metastatic tumor tissues from colorectal cancer: a pilot study.

Young Sam Kim1, Ju Hye Shin1, Mi Kyung Bae2, Chang Young Lee2, Dae Joon Kim2, Kyung Young Chung2, Jin Gu Lee3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Autophagy has been reported to be involved in treatment failure in tumor. We aimed to evaluate autophagy activity in tumor tissue and compare them between the recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed expressions of autophagy-related proteins in tumor tissues which were obtained from pulmonary metastases of colorectal cancer patients by Western blot. We also analyzed autophagosomes by transmission electron microscopy.
RESULTS: Tumor tissues from recurrence group showed increased levels of LC3B-II, decreased levels of p62/SQSTM1, and also a marked accumulation of autophagosomes compared with tissues from non-recurrence group.
CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that autophagy may be associated with treatment failure of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; autophagy; metastasis; treatment failure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25323883      PMCID: PMC4205686          DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.6.1484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonsei Med J        ISSN: 0513-5796            Impact factor:   2.759


INTRODUCTION

Autophagy is a catabolic digestion process of cellular organelles1 and plays an important role in protecting cells from adverse conditions2,3,4,5,6 by degrading and recycling of cytosolic, or aggregated proteins, as well as excess or defective organelles. The process of autophagy has been implicated in both cellular survival and cell death.7,8 The role of autophagy in tumor is commonly expressed by double-edged sword.9,10 Before the development of a tumor, autophagy is considered to act as a tumor suppressor; however, after tumor develops, it supports the growth of the tumor. Specifically, autophagy activities have been reported to be enhanced in response to metabolic stress caused by chemotherapy or radiation as a cell survival mechanism, contributing to treatment resistance in cancer.9,10,11,12 Furthermore, elevated autophagy activity has been reported to be associated with aggressiveness in cancer tissue.13 Colorectal cancer (CRC) brings about metastases in 60% of the cases, with involvement of the liver (40%), lung (15%), or both (10%).14 Although development of chemotherapeutic regimens combined with surgical resection has made it possible to treat the metastatic CRC, half of patients develop local or distant recurrence.15 The treatment failure in some individuals is due to the development of resistance, and the mechanisms involved in chemotherapy resistance remain unknown. We hypothesized that autophagy may contribute to the treatment failure of cancer patients. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the autophagy activity in tumor tissue obtained from patients who had pulmonary metastasis from CRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and samples

To test autophagy-related activity in tumor tissue, 10 pulmonary metastasis tissues from CRC patients who had over 12 months follow up period were selected from prospective collections of the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine. Patients underwent curative intent pulmonary resection for metastasis from CRC from November 2011. Clinical records were reviewed retrospectively. The research has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University College of Medicine, and all the patients had signed an informed consent. Tumor specimens were obtained at surgery. The specimens were prepared for protein extraction and electron microscopy.

Protein extraction and Western blotting of tumor tissues

Tumor tissues were homogenized in 1 mL of RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.1% SDS, 2 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100) and protease inhibitor cocktail. The homogenate was incubated for 20 minutes on ice and then centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4℃. The supernatant was collected and the same volume of 5X SDS buffer was added to the supernatant. The mixture was then boiled for 5 minutes and stored at -80℃. Proteins were separated by sodium dodecy1 sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on 8-16% polyacrylamide gels. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat milk, in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween-20 (TBST), at room temperature for 1 hour. The membranes were then incubated with a rabbit monoclonal antibody against LC3 (1:2000 diluted in TBST, Novus, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) overnight at 4℃ and washed five times with TBST for 10 minutes each at room temperature. Membranes were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:2000 dilution in TBST, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 37℃ for 1 hour and were washed five times with TBST for 10 minutes each at room temperature. Membranes were treated with ECL (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) reagent and exposed to photographic film. Each band was quantified using densitometry, and the results were shown as relative expression of each protein from different samples compared to that of control sample.

Electron microscopy

After thermal stresses for 12 hours, each sample was fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde-paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB), pH 7.4 for 2 hours and washed three times for 30 minutes each in 0.1 M PB. Samples were then postfixed with 1% OsO4 dissolved in 0.1 M PB for 2 hours and dehydrated in an ascending gradual series (50-100%) of ethanol and infiltrated with propylene oxide. Specimens were embedded using a Poly/Bed 812 kit. After pure fresh resin embedment and polymerization at 60℃ in an electron microscope oven (TD-700, DOSAKA, Kyoto, Japan) for 24 hours, 350 nm thick sections were cut and stained with toluidine blue for light microscopy. Next, 70 nm thin sections were double stained with 7% uranyl acetate and lead citrate for contrast staining. The sections were cut by a LEICA Ultracut UCT Ultra-microtome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). All of the thin sections were observed by transmission electron microscopy (JEM-1011, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at an acceleration voltage of 80 kV.

Statistical analysis

The data were expressed as mean±SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test. The criterion for statistical significance was p<0.05.

RESULTS

Patients characteristics

Clinical features of the cases are summarized in Table 1. Five patients experienced recurrence during the follow up time. All recurrences occurred in lung except one case. All 10 patients had been treated by pulmonary resection and chemotherapy before or after operation.
Table 1

Patients Profile

C, chemotherapy; Op, pulmonary resection; FOLFOX, 5-fluorouracil+leukovorin+oxaliplatin; FL, 5-fluorouracil+leucovorin.

Elevated autophagy activity correlates with treatment failure of pulmonary metastasis from CRC

To investigate whether autophagy activity correlates with treatment failure in patients with pulmonary metastasis from CRC, we analyzed the protein level of LC3B-II which is a hallmark of autophagy by Western blotting. Tumor tissues of patients who experienced recurrence showed increased level of LC3B-II compared with tissues from patients who had no recurrence (p<0.05) (Fig. 1). At the same time, we analyzed the protein levels of p62/sequestosome1 (SQSTM1) which is degraded in the autolysosome, thus testing an another marker of autophagy flux. Tumor tissues of patients who experienced recurrence showed trends of decreased level of p62/SQSTM1 compared with tissues from patients who had no recurrence (p=0.201) (Fig. 2). On the other hand, autophagy activity of peri-tumor tissue showed no difference between no recurrence and recurrence group (p=0.797) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 1

Increased autophagy activity (LC3II) correlates with treatment failure of pulmonary metastasis in colorectal cancer patients. (A) Western blot analysis for LC3B-II protein in tumors of CRC patients. The levels of LC3B-II were higher in tumor tissues from patients who had experienced recurrence than tissues from patients who had no recurrence. (B) Expression intensity of Western blot was measured by image J program. The data are mean±SEM (*p<0.05). CRC, colorectal cancer; SEM, standard error of mean.

Fig. 2

Decreased p62/SQSTM1 correlates with treatment failure of pulmonary metastasis in colorectal cancer patients. (A) Western blot analysis for p62/SQSTM1 in tumors of CRC patients. The p62/SQSTM1 expressions of tumor tissue from patients who had experienced recurrence showed trends of lower levels than tissues from patients who had no recurrence. (B) Expression intensity of Western blot was measured by image J program. The data are mean±SEM (p=0.201). CRC, colorectal cancer; SEM, standard error of mean.

Fig. 3

Autophagy activity (LC3II) of peri-tumor tissue shows no difference between no recurrence and recurrence group. (A) Western blot analysis for LC3B-II protein in peri-tumors of CRC patients. The levels of LC3B-II were not different in both no recurrence and recurrence group. (B) Expression intensity of Western blot was measured by image J program. The data are mean±SEM (p=0.797). CRC, colorectal cancer; SEM, standard error of mean.

Enhanced autophagy vacuoles in treatment failed patients

Transmission electron microscopy, another gold standard assay of autophagy showed a marked accumulation of autophagosomes in cells of treatment failed patients (p<0.05), where cytoplasmic material and/or membrane vesicles were encapsulated in vacuoles (black arrows, Fig. 4). These results indicate that increased autophagy activity is associated with treatment failure in patients after combined chemotherapy and surgical resection.
Fig. 4

Autophagy vacuoles in tumor tissue from pulmonary metastasis in colorectal cancer patients by electron microscopy. (A) Electron micrographs showing ultrastructure of tumor tissue. Arrows indicate double-membraned autophagic vacuoles (magnification, ×20000). (B) Quantification of autophagic vacuoles in tumor cells was performed. The number of autophagic vacuoles in each cell was counted. The data are mean±SEM (*p<0.05). N, no recurrence; R, recurrence; SEM, standard error of mean.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we showed that autophagy activities were enhanced in tumor tissue from recurrence group compared with non-recurrence group, suggesting that autophagy activity could be one of the mechanisms associated with treatment failure in patients with pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to correlate autophagy activity and treatment failure in tumor tissue obtained from pulmonary metastasis of colorectal cancer. Autophagy is a catabolic digestion process of cellular organelles1, and essential for protecting cells from adverse conditions.2,3,4,5,6 The process of autophagy has been implicated in both cellular survival and cell death.7,8 Cytoplasmic organelles are engulfed by double membrane structures and conveyed to lysosomes/vacuoles for degradation and recycling during the process. LC3 is autophagy-related protein that is associated with autophagosome membranes. The cytoplasmic form (LC3B-I) is processed and recruited to autophagosomes, where LC3B-II is produced by proteolysis and lipidation. The protein p62/SQSTM1 acts as an adaptor to target ubiquinated protein by binding both ubiquitin and LC3.16 Following the binding of p62/SQSTM1 to LC3B-II, the autophagosome completes and fuses with lysosomes, resulting in the degradation of p62/SQSTM1. Thus, p62/SQSTM1 degradation can be used as an another marker of autophagy flux.17 To assess the autophagy activity, therefore, monitoring of protein levels of LC3B-II and p62/SQSTM1 by Western blot and confirming the ultrastructure of autophagic vacuoles by electron microscopy are essential, as described in the present study. Recently, autophagy has been suggested to explain for the mechanism of treatment resistance in cancer patients. However, the role of autophagy in tumor is controversial, and has commonly been described as a double-edged sword because it functions both as a tumor suppressor and a protector of cancer cell.9,10 Specifically, after a tumor develops, autophagy acts to support the persistence of the tumor. According to many studies, autophagy activities are enhanced in response to treatment such as chemotherapy and radiation, contributing to treatment resistance in cancer cell.9,10,11,12 In addition, autophagy has been reported to correlate with tumor aggressiveness, including tumor differentiation, growth pattern of the tumor margin, pN, pstage as well as vessel and nerve plexus invasion in colorectal cancer.13 In the present study, we showed that autophagy was enhanced in recurrence group. This might be related with chemotherapy resistance or tumor aggressiveness. However, we could not confirm underlying mechanism of this treatment failure. To assess the underlying mechanism, further study is needed with more patient data. Most of the understanding on the role of autophagy in cancer have come from the studies with cancer cell lines expressing autophagy markers. There is, however, little knowledge regarding the autophagy in clinical tumor samples; especially the extent of which varies depending on tumor tissues. To test our hypothesis, therefore, we measured autophagy activity in tumor tissues obtained from pulmonary metastasis of colorectal cancer patients who were followed up for over one year. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on enhanced autophagy activity in human metastatic lung cancer tissue.
  17 in total

Review 1.  Selective autophagy mediated by autophagic adapter proteins.

Authors:  Terje Johansen; Trond Lamark
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 16.016

2.  DNA damaging agent-induced autophagy produces a cytoprotective adenosine triphosphate surge in malignant glioma cells.

Authors:  M Katayama; T Kawaguchi; M S Berger; R O Pieper
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  Growth factor regulation of autophagy and cell survival in the absence of apoptosis.

Authors:  Julian J Lum; Daniel E Bauer; Mei Kong; Marian H Harris; Chi Li; Tullia Lindsten; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Autophagy: is it cancer's friend or foe?

Authors:  Jean Marx
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Management of lung metastases from colorectal cancer: video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy--a case-matched study.

Authors:  Yin-Kai Chao; Hao-Cheng Chang; Yi-Cheng Wu; Yun-hen Liu; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Jy-Ming Chiang; Hui-Ping Liu
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 6.  The double-edged sword of autophagy modulation in cancer.

Authors:  Eileen White; Robert S DiPaola
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Role of autophagy in cancer.

Authors:  Robin Mathew; Vassiliki Karantza-Wadsworth; Eileen White
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Hypoxia signals autophagy in tumor cells via AMPK activity, independent of HIF-1, BNIP3, and BNIP3L.

Authors:  I Papandreou; A L Lim; K Laderoute; N C Denko
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 9.  Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy in higher eukaryotes.

Authors:  Daniel J Klionsky; Hagai Abeliovich; Patrizia Agostinis; Devendra K Agrawal; Gjumrakch Aliev; David S Askew; Misuzu Baba; Eric H Baehrecke; Ben A Bahr; Andrea Ballabio; Bruce A Bamber; Diane C Bassham; Ettore Bergamini; Xiaoning Bi; Martine Biard-Piechaczyk; Janice S Blum; Dale E Bredesen; Jeffrey L Brodsky; John H Brumell; Ulf T Brunk; Wilfried Bursch; Nadine Camougrand; Eduardo Cebollero; Francesco Cecconi; Yingyu Chen; Lih-Shen Chin; Augustine Choi; Charleen T Chu; Jongkyeong Chung; Peter G H Clarke; Robert S B Clark; Steven G Clarke; Corinne Clavé; John L Cleveland; Patrice Codogno; María I Colombo; Ana Coto-Montes; James M Cregg; Ana Maria Cuervo; Jayanta Debnath; Francesca Demarchi; Patrick B Dennis; Phillip A Dennis; Vojo Deretic; Rodney J Devenish; Federica Di Sano; J Fred Dice; Marian Difiglia; Savithramma Dinesh-Kumar; Clark W Distelhorst; Mojgan Djavaheri-Mergny; Frank C Dorsey; Wulf Dröge; Michel Dron; William A Dunn; Michael Duszenko; N Tony Eissa; Zvulun Elazar; Audrey Esclatine; Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen; László Fésüs; Kim D Finley; José M Fuentes; Juan Fueyo; Kozo Fujisaki; Brigitte Galliot; Fen-Biao Gao; David A Gewirtz; Spencer B Gibson; Antje Gohla; Alfred L Goldberg; Ramon Gonzalez; Cristina González-Estévez; Sharon Gorski; Roberta A Gottlieb; Dieter Häussinger; You-Wen He; Kim Heidenreich; Joseph A Hill; Maria Høyer-Hansen; Xun Hu; Wei-Pang Huang; Akiko Iwasaki; Marja Jäättelä; William T Jackson; Xuejun Jiang; Shengkan Jin; Terje Johansen; Jae U Jung; Motoni Kadowaki; Chanhee Kang; Ameeta Kelekar; David H Kessel; Jan A K W Kiel; Hong Pyo Kim; Adi Kimchi; Timothy J Kinsella; Kirill Kiselyov; Katsuhiko Kitamoto; Erwin Knecht; Masaaki Komatsu; Eiki Kominami; Seiji Kondo; Attila L Kovács; Guido Kroemer; Chia-Yi Kuan; Rakesh Kumar; Mondira Kundu; Jacques Landry; Marianne Laporte; Weidong Le; Huan-Yao Lei; Michael J Lenardo; Beth Levine; Andrew Lieberman; Kah-Leong Lim; Fu-Cheng Lin; Willisa Liou; Leroy F Liu; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Carlos López-Otín; Bo Lu; Kay F Macleod; Walter Malorni; Wim Martinet; Ken Matsuoka; Josef Mautner; Alfred J Meijer; Alicia Meléndez; Paul Michels; Giovanni Miotto; Wilhelm P Mistiaen; Noboru Mizushima; Baharia Mograbi; Iryna Monastyrska; Michael N Moore; Paula I Moreira; Yuji Moriyasu; Tomasz Motyl; Christian Münz; Leon O Murphy; Naweed I Naqvi; Thomas P Neufeld; Ichizo Nishino; Ralph A Nixon; Takeshi Noda; Bernd Nürnberg; Michinaga Ogawa; Nancy L Oleinick; Laura J Olsen; Bulent Ozpolat; Shoshana Paglin; Glen E Palmer; Issidora Papassideri; Miles Parkes; David H Perlmutter; George Perry; Mauro Piacentini; Ronit Pinkas-Kramarski; Mark Prescott; Tassula Proikas-Cezanne; Nina Raben; Abdelhaq Rami; Fulvio Reggiori; Bärbel Rohrer; David C Rubinsztein; Kevin M Ryan; Junichi Sadoshima; Hiroshi Sakagami; Yasuyoshi Sakai; Marco Sandri; Chihiro Sasakawa; Miklós Sass; Claudio Schneider; Per O Seglen; Oleksandr Seleverstov; Jeffrey Settleman; John J Shacka; Irving M Shapiro; Andrei Sibirny; Elaine C M Silva-Zacarin; Hans-Uwe Simon; Cristiano Simone; Anne Simonsen; Mark A Smith; Katharina Spanel-Borowski; Vickram Srinivas; Meredith Steeves; Harald Stenmark; Per E Stromhaug; Carlos S Subauste; Seiichiro Sugimoto; David Sulzer; Toshihiko Suzuki; Michele S Swanson; Ira Tabas; Fumihiko Takeshita; Nicholas J Talbot; Zsolt Tallóczy; Keiji Tanaka; Kozo Tanaka; Isei Tanida; Graham S Taylor; J Paul Taylor; Alexei Terman; Gianluca Tettamanti; Craig B Thompson; Michael Thumm; Aviva M Tolkovsky; Sharon A Tooze; Ray Truant; Lesya V Tumanovska; Yasuo Uchiyama; Takashi Ueno; Néstor L Uzcátegui; Ida van der Klei; Eva C Vaquero; Tibor Vellai; Michael W Vogel; Hong-Gang Wang; Paul Webster; John W Wiley; Zhijun Xi; Gutian Xiao; Joachim Yahalom; Jin-Ming Yang; George Yap; Xiao-Ming Yin; Tamotsu Yoshimori; Li Yu; Zhenyu Yue; Michisuke Yuzaki; Olga Zabirnyk; Xiaoxiang Zheng; Xiongwei Zhu; Russell L Deter
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 16.016

10.  Autophagy enhances the aggressiveness of human colorectal cancer cells and their ability to adapt to apoptotic stimulus.

Authors:  Hai-Yang Zheng; Xiao-Yang Zhang; Xing-Fen Wang; Bao-Cun Sun
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.248

View more
  4 in total

1.  Inhibition of autophagy by bafilomycin A1 promotes chemosensitivity of gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  Liang-Qing Li; Wen-Jun Xie; Dun Pan; Hui Chen; Lin Zhang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-08-05

2.  circHIPK3 promotes oxaliplatin-resistance in colorectal cancer through autophagy by sponging miR-637.

Authors:  Yanli Zhang; Chen Li; Xinfeng Liu; Yanlei Wang; Rui Zhao; Yongmei Yang; Xin Zheng; Yi Zhang; Xin Zhang
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 8.143

3.  A study on the potential role of autophagy-related protein 10 as a biomarker for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Fatemeh Abbasi Teshnizi; Nasrin Kazemipour; Saeed Nazifi; Kamran Bagheri Lankarani; Masood Sepehrimanesh; Iman Razeghian Jahromi
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-04

Review 4.  P62: An emerging oncotarget for osteolytic metastasis.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Zuozhang Yang; Jian Dong
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 4.072

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.