Rui Zeng1, Chun-Hua Xu2, Yuan-Ning Xu1, Ya-Li Wang1, Mian Wang1. 1. 1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases,West China Hospital,School of Clinical Medicine,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,People's Republic of China. 2. 2Department of Cardiovascular Diseases,The Second People's Hospital of Neijiang,Neijiang,People's Republic of China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Folate and vitamin B12 are two vital regulators in the metabolic process of homocysteine, which is a risk factor of atherothrombotic events. Low folate intake or low plasma folate concentration is associated with increased stroke risk. Previous randomized controlled trials presented discordant findings in the effect of folic acid supplementation-based homocysteine lowering on stroke risk. The aim of the present review was to perform a meta-analysis of relevant randomized controlled trials to check the how different folate fortification status might affect the effects of folic acid supplementation in lowering homocysteine and reducing stroke risk. DESIGN: Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified through formal literature search. Homocysteine reduction was compared in subgroups stratified by folate fortification status. Relative risks with 95 % confidence intervals were used as a measure to assess the association between folic acid supplementation and stroke risk. SETTING: The meta-analysis included fourteen randomized controlled trials, SUBJECTS: A total of 39 420 patients. RESULTS: Homocysteine reductions were 26·99 (sd 1·91) %, 18·38 (sd 3·82) % and 21·30 (sd 1·98) %, respectively, in the subgroups without folate fortification, with folate fortification and with partial folate fortification. Significant difference was observed between the subgroups with folate fortification and without folate fortification (P=0·05). The relative risk of stroke was 0·88 (95 % CI 0·77, 1·00, P=0·05) in the subgroup without folate fortification, 0·94 (95 % CI 0·58, 1·54, P=0·82) in the subgroup with folate fortification and 0·91 (95 % CI 0·82, 1·01, P=0·09) in the subgroup with partial folate fortification. CONCLUSIONS: Folic acid supplementation might have a modest benefit on stroke prevention in regions without folate fortification.
OBJECTIVE:Folate and vitamin B12 are two vital regulators in the metabolic process of homocysteine, which is a risk factor of atherothrombotic events. Low folate intake or low plasma folate concentration is associated with increased stroke risk. Previous randomized controlled trials presented discordant findings in the effect of folic acid supplementation-based homocysteine lowering on stroke risk. The aim of the present review was to perform a meta-analysis of relevant randomized controlled trials to check the how different folate fortification status might affect the effects of folic acid supplementation in lowering homocysteine and reducing stroke risk. DESIGN: Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified through formal literature search. Homocysteine reduction was compared in subgroups stratified by folate fortification status. Relative risks with 95 % confidence intervals were used as a measure to assess the association between folic acid supplementation and stroke risk. SETTING: The meta-analysis included fourteen randomized controlled trials, SUBJECTS: A total of 39 420 patients. RESULTS:Homocysteine reductions were 26·99 (sd 1·91) %, 18·38 (sd 3·82) % and 21·30 (sd 1·98) %, respectively, in the subgroups without folate fortification, with folate fortification and with partial folate fortification. Significant difference was observed between the subgroups with folate fortification and without folate fortification (P=0·05). The relative risk of stroke was 0·88 (95 % CI 0·77, 1·00, P=0·05) in the subgroup without folate fortification, 0·94 (95 % CI 0·58, 1·54, P=0·82) in the subgroup with folate fortification and 0·91 (95 % CI 0·82, 1·01, P=0·09) in the subgroup with partial folate fortification. CONCLUSIONS:Folic acid supplementation might have a modest benefit on stroke prevention in regions without folate fortification.
Authors: Daniel Rajdl; Jaroslav Racek; Ladislav Trefil; Pavel Stehlik; Jana Dobra; Vaclav Babuska Journal: Nutrients Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 5.717