Literature DB >> 25323461

Training Intensity Affects Motor Rehabilitation Efficacy Following Unilateral Ischemic Insult of the Sensorimotor Cortex in C57BL/6 Mice.

Jared A Bell1, Malerie L Wolke1, Ryan C Ortez1, Theresa A Jones1, Abigail L Kerr2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Motor rehabilitative training improves behavioral functionality and promotes beneficial neural reorganization following stroke but is often insufficient to normalize function. Rodent studies have relied on skilled reaching tasks to model motor rehabilitation and explore factors contributing to its efficacy. It has been found that greater training intensity (sessions/day) and duration (training days) facilitates motor skill learning in intact animals. Whether rehabilitative training efficacy varies with intensity following stroke is unclear.
METHODS: Mice were trained preoperatively on a skilled reaching task. Following focal ischemic lesions, mice received rehabilitative training either twice daily (high intensity [HI]), once daily (low intensity [LI]), or not at all (control) to determine the effects of rehabilitative training intensity on skilled motor performance.
RESULTS: Within 7 days, the HI-trained mice achieved preischemic levels of performance. Mice receiving LI training eventually reached similar performance levels but required a greater quantity of training. Training intensity did not consistently affect the maintenance of performance gains, which were partially lost over time in both groups. DISCUSSION: These data indicate that increased training intensity increases the rate of functional improvements per time and per training session following ischemic insult. Thus, training intensity is an important variable to consider in efforts to optimize rehabilitation efficacy.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  learning; motor cortex; motor skills; recovery of function; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25323461      PMCID: PMC4400185          DOI: 10.1177/1545968314553031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  47 in total

1.  The pasta matrix reaching task: a simple test for measuring skilled reaching distance, direction, and dexterity in rats.

Authors:  M Ballermann; G A Metz; J E McKenna; F Klassen; I Q Whishaw
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2001-03-30       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 2.  Neurogenesis after ischaemic brain insults.

Authors:  Zaal Kokaia; Olle Lindvall
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Enriched rehabilitative training promotes improved forelimb motor function and enhanced dendritic growth after focal ischemic injury.

Authors:  J Biernaskie; D Corbett
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  A behavioral method for identifying recovery and compensation: hand use in a preclinical stroke model using the single pellet reaching task.

Authors:  Mariam Alaverdashvili; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Skill learning induced plasticity of motor cortical representations is time and age-dependent.

Authors:  Kelly A Tennant; DeAnna L Adkins; Matthew D Scalco; Nicole A Donlan; Aaron L Asay; Nagheme Thomas; Jeffrey A Kleim; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.877

6.  Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models?

Authors:  John W Krakauer; S Thomas Carmichael; Dale Corbett; George F Wittenberg
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Loss of the innate cortical engram for action patterns used in skilled reaching and the development of behavioral compensation following motor cortex lesions in the rat.

Authors:  I Q Whishaw
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2000-03-03       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Quantitative and qualitative impairments in skilled reaching in the mouse (Mus musculus) after a focal motor cortex stroke.

Authors:  Tracy D Farr; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions in adult rats facilitate motor skill learning with the "unaffected" forelimb and training-induced dendritic structural plasticity in the motor cortex.

Authors:  Scott D Bury; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Age-dependent reorganization of peri-infarct "premotor" cortex with task-specific rehabilitative training in mice.

Authors:  Kelly A Tennant; Abigail L Kerr; DeAnna L Adkins; Nicole Donlan; Nagheme Thomas; Jeffrey A Kleim; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.919

View more
  16 in total

1.  Hebbian-Type Primary Motor Cortex Stimulation: A Potential Treatment of Impaired Hand Function in Chronic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Kate Pirog Revill; Marc W Haut; Samir R Belagaje; Fadi Nahab; Daniel Drake; Cathrin M Buetefisch
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Voluntary exercise ameliorates the good limb training effect in a mouse model of stroke.

Authors:  Victoria Nemchek; Emma M Haan; Rachel Mavros; Amanda Macuiba; Abigail L Kerr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Future of Animal Modeling for Poststroke Tissue Repair.

Authors:  Michel M Modo; Jukka Jolkkonen; Marietta Zille; Johannes Boltze
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Rehabilitation and the Neural Network After Stroke.

Authors:  Norihito Shimamura; Takeshi Katagai; Kiyohide Kakuta; Naoya Matsuda; Kosuke Katayama; Nozomi Fujiwara; Yuuka Watanabe; Masato Naraoka; Hiroki Ohkuma
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 5.  Motor System Reorganization After Stroke: Stimulating and Training Toward Perfection.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones; DeAnna L Adkins
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-09

Review 6.  Dose and timing in neurorehabilitation: prescribing motor therapy after stroke.

Authors:  Catherine E Lang; Keith R Lohse; Rebecca L Birkenmeier
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.283

7.  Dose response of task-specific upper limb training in people at least 6 months poststroke: A phase II, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Catherine E Lang; Michael J Strube; Marghuretta D Bland; Kimberly J Waddell; Kendra M Cherry-Allen; Randolph J Nudo; Alexander W Dromerick; Rebecca L Birkenmeier
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 11.274

8.  Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT).

Authors:  Julie Bernhardt; Leonid Churilov; Fiona Ellery; Janice Collier; Jan Chamberlain; Peter Langhorne; Richard I Lindley; Marj Moodie; Helen Dewey; Amanda G Thrift; Geoff Donnan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 9.  Understanding the Mechanisms of Recovery and/or Compensation following Injury.

Authors:  Michael J Hylin; Abigail L Kerr; Ryan Holden
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Dose Articulation in Preclinical and Clinical Stroke Recovery: Refining a Discovery Research Pipeline and Presenting a Scoping Review Protocol.

Authors:  Emily Dalton; Leonid Churilov; Natasha A Lannin; Dale Corbett; Kathryn S Hayward
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.