Literature DB >> 25322792

Divergent selection for residual feed intake in group-housed growing pigs: characteristics of physical and behavioural activity according to line and sex.

M C Meunier-Salaün1, C Guérin1, Y Billon2, P Sellier3, J Noblet1, H Gilbert3.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the impact of selection for residual feed intake (RFI) on the behavioural activity of lines divergently selected for RFI during seven generations. In all, six successive batches from the seventh generation of selection were raised in collective pens equipped with a single-place electronic feeder (SEF) from 10 weeks of age to 100 kg BW. Each batch included four groups of 12 pigs: high RFI (RFI+) castrated males, RFI+ females, low RFI (RFI-) castrated males, RFI- females. At 17 weeks of age, health criteria were evaluated using a gradient scale for increased severity of lameness, body lesions, bursae and tail biting. Individual behavioural activities were recorded by 24-h video tape on the day after health evaluation. The investigative motivation towards unfamiliar objects was quantified at 18 weeks of age. The daily individual feeding patterns were computed from SEF records during the 4 weeks surrounding 12, 17 and 22 weeks of age. All pigs spent significantly most of their time lying in diurnal (80% of total scan) and nocturnal (>89%) periods. The RFI- pigs showed a lower proportion of health problems (P<0.01) than RFI+ pigs. The RFI- pigs used the SEF less than the RFI+ pigs, in diurnal (5.3% v. 6.4% of video scans, P<0.05) and nocturnal periods (3.6% v. 4.5% of video scans, P<0.05). This was confirmed by a significantly lower daily number and duration of visits to the SEF computed from the SEF data. The feeding activity measured from the video recording was significantly correlated (R>0.34; P<0.05) with feeding patterns computed from the SEF. The RFI- pigs spent less time standing over the 24-h period (9.7% v. 12.2% of scans, i.e. 35 min/day, P<0.05). In terms of energy costs, this amounted to 14% of the line difference in terms of daily metabolizable energy intake. The castrated males used the SEF more than females, especially at night (4.7% v. 3.4% of total scans, P<0.05), whereas females displayed greater investigation of their environment (7.7±0.3% v. 6.6±0.2% of total scans, P<0.05) and the novel objects (10.7% v. 4.9% of total scans, P<0.05). In conclusion, the lower physical activity associated with reduced energy expenditure in RFI- pigs compared with RFI+ pigs contributed significantly to their improved efficiency and was not related to worsened health scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25322792     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114001839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  10 in total

1.  Association analysis between feed efficiency and expression of key genes of the avTOR signaling pathway in meat-type ducks.

Authors:  Lei Yang; Tingting He; Yuan Xu; He Zang; Jiafa Wang; Zhiqiang Lin; Sihua Jin; Zhaoyu Geng
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Impact of selection for residual feed intake on production traits and behavior of mule ducks.

Authors:  L Drouilhet; R Monteville; C Molette; M Lague; A Cornuez; L Canario; E Ricard; H Gilbert
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Responses to weaning in two pig lines divergently selected for residual feed intake depending on diet.

Authors:  Hélène Gilbert; Julien Ruesche; Nelly Muller; Yvon Billon; Vincent Begos; Lucile Montagne
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  Review: divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig.

Authors:  H Gilbert; Y Billon; L Brossard; J Faure; P Gatellier; F Gondret; E Labussière; B Lebret; L Lefaucheur; N Le Floch; I Louveau; E Merlot; M-C Meunier-Salaün; L Montagne; P Mormede; D Renaudeau; J Riquet; C Rogel-Gaillard; J van Milgen; A Vincent; J Noblet
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Finishing pigs that are divergent in feed efficiency show small differences in intestinal functionality and structure.

Authors:  Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli; Peadar G Lawlor; Elizabeth Magowan; Ursula M McCormack; Tânia Curião; Manfred Hollmann; Reinhard Ertl; Jörg R Aschenbach; Qendrim Zebeli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A Hypothesis and Review of the Relationship between Selection for Improved Production Efficiency, Coping Behavior, and Domestication.

Authors:  Wendy M Rauw; Anna K Johnson; Luis Gomez-Raya; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  The influence of feeding behaviour on growth performance, carcass and meat characteristics of growing pigs.

Authors:  Giuseppe Carcò; Luigi Gallo; Mirco Dalla Bona; Maria Angeles Latorre; Manuel Fondevila; Stefano Schiavon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Selection for feed efficiency elicits different postprandial plasma metabolite profiles in response to poor hygiene of housing conditions in growing pigs.

Authors:  Alícia Zem Fraga; Isabelle Louveau; Paulo Henrique Reis Furtado Campos; Luciano Hauschild; Nathalie Le Floc'h
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Plasticity of feeding behaviour traits in response to production environment (temperate vs. tropical) in group-housed growing pigs.

Authors:  Nausicaa Poullet; Wendy M Rauw; David Renaudeau; Juliette Riquet; Mario Giorgi; Yvon Billon; Hélène Gilbert; Jean-Luc Gourdine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Continuous Monitoring of Pigs in Fattening Using a Multi-Sensor System: Behavior Patterns.

Authors:  Miguel Garrido-Izard; Eva-Cristina Correa; José-María Requejo; Belén Diezma
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.