Literature DB >> 25322682

Patients' perceptions of research biopsies in phase I oncology trials.

Charlotte Lemech1, Divyanshu Dua, Joshua Newmark, Matilde Saggese, Emily Simmons, Paulina Spiliopoulou, Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Research biopsies are increasingly incorporated into phase I oncology trials resulting in ethical and logistical challenges for patients and clinicians. Patients' understanding and willingness to undergo these biopsies are crucial.
METHODS: Over 12 months, we administered a questionnaire comprising three sections: demographics and previous cancer therapy, understanding of phase I trials and personalized medicine, and understanding of biopsies and associated risks.
RESULTS: Out of 56 patients approached, 47 patients completed the questionnaire. Overall, the patients were well informed about the concepts of personalized medicine and 89% (n = 42) were aware that early phase clinical trials aim to define a dose and explore side effects of new drugs. Interestingly, 76% (n = 36) expected early phase trials to improve symptoms, quality of life and survival. Offering hope and feeling in control of their treatment were important components for 80% (n = 38) and 57% (n = 27), respectively. The majority of this highly selective patient cohort understood the concept of research biopsies, with 59% (n = 28) willing to have a fresh research biopsy for trial participation. Although 72% (n = 34) felt that research biopsies should be optional, only 19% (n = 9) would not participate in a clinical trial with mandatory biopsies. Compared to diagnostic biopsies, the patients were less likely to accept associated risks with research biopsies.
CONCLUSION: As research biopsies are crucial to many components of the drug development process, our study provides evidence for patients' overall willingness to undergo research biopsies for trial purposes. A consent process tailored to the biopsy site may help patients weigh up the associated risks versus benefits.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25322682     DOI: 10.1159/000368161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  5 in total

1.  Burdensome Research Procedures in Trials: Why Less Is More.

Authors:  Jonathan Kimmelman; David B Resnik; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Patient and public understanding of the concept of 'personalised medicine' in relation to cancer treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jed Botham; Valerie Shilling; John Jones
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2021-11

Review 3.  Prognostic/predictive markers in systemic therapy resistance and metastasis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Evthokia A Hobbs; Natalie Chen; Alphi Kuriakose; Elizabeth Bonefas; Bora Lim
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 5.485

4.  Analyses of the Rationale and Implementation of Research Biopsies in Oncology Clinical Trials at a Tertiary Cancer Center.

Authors:  Nathalie Olympios; Laetitia Collet; Marianne Paesmans; Christiane Jungels; Nuria Kotecki; Ahmad Awada; Philippe Aftimos
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-08-04

5.  Ultrasound-guided lymph node biopsy sampling to study the immunopathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis: a well-tolerated valuable research tool.

Authors:  Renée H Fiechter; Janne W Bolt; Sander W Tas; Lisa G M van Baarsen; Marleen G H van de Sande; Caroline J Aalbers; Robert B M Landewé; Mario Maas
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 5.156

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.