Literature DB >> 25321888

VOR gain by head impulse video-oculography differentiates acute vestibular neuritis from stroke.

Georgios Mantokoudis1, Ali S Saber Tehrani, Amy Wozniak, Karin Eibenberger, Jorge C Kattah, Cynthia I Guede, David S Zee, David E Newman-Toker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Vestibular neuritis is often mimicked by stroke (pseudoneuritis). Vestibular eye movements help discriminate the two conditions. We report vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain measures in neuritis and stroke presenting acute vestibular syndrome (AVS).
METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional study of AVS (acute continuous vertigo/dizziness lasting >24 h) at two academic centers. We measured horizontal head impulse test (HIT) VOR gains in 26 AVS patients using a video HIT device (ICS Impulse). All patients were assessed within 1 week of symptom onset. Diagnoses were confirmed by clinical examinations, brain magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted images, and follow-up. Brainstem and cerebellar strokes were classified by vascular territory-posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) or anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA).
RESULTS: Diagnoses were vestibular neuritis (n = 16) and posterior fossa stroke (PICA, n = 7; AICA, n = 3). Mean HIT VOR gains (ipsilesional [standard error of the mean], contralesional [standard error of the mean]) were as follows: vestibular neuritis (0.52 [0.04], 0.87 [0.04]); PICA stroke (0.94 [0.04], 0.93 [0.04]); AICA stroke (0.84 [0.10], 0.74 [0.10]). VOR gains were asymmetric in neuritis (unilateral vestibulopathy) and symmetric in PICA stroke (bilaterally normal VOR), whereas gains in AICA stroke were heterogeneous (asymmetric, bilaterally low, or normal). In vestibular neuritis, borderline gains ranged from 0.62 to 0.73. Twenty patients (12 neuritis, six PICA strokes, two AICA strokes) had at least five interpretable HIT trials (for both ears), allowing an appropriate classification based on mean VOR gains per ear. Classifying AVS patients with bilateral VOR mean gains of 0.70 or more as suspected strokes yielded a total diagnostic accuracy of 90%, with stroke sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 92%.
CONCLUSION: Video HIT VOR gains differ between peripheral and central causes of AVS. PICA strokes were readily separated from neuritis using gain measures, but AICA strokes were at risk of being misclassified based on VOR gain alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25321888     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  38 in total

1.  Association of the Video Head Impulse Test With Improvement of Dynamic Balance and Fall Risk in Patients With Dizziness.

Authors:  Tzu-Pu Chang; Michael C Schubert
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 2.  Consensus Paper: Neurophysiological Assessments of Ataxias in Daily Practice.

Authors:  W Ilg; M Branscheidt; A Butala; P Celnik; L de Paola; F B Horak; L Schöls; H A G Teive; A P Vogel; D S Zee; D Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Power spectra prognostic aspects of impulsive eye movement traces in superior vestibular neuritis.

Authors:  Alessandro Micarelli; Andrea Viziano; Massimo Panella; Elisa Micarelli; Marco Alessandrini
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  The dizzy patient: don't forget disorders of the central vestibular system.

Authors:  Thomas Brandt; Marianne Dieterich
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 5.  Video head impulse test: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Salman F Alhabib; Issam Saliba
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Acute vestibular syndrome: clinical head impulse test versus video head impulse test.

Authors:  Nese Celebisoy
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 7.  Acute vestibular syndrome: a critical review and diagnostic algorithm concerning the clinical differentiation of peripheral versus central aetiologies in the emergency department.

Authors:  J Venhovens; J Meulstee; W I M Verhagen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  [Acute vestibular syndrome : Clinical examination outperforms MRI in the detection of central lesions].

Authors:  F Thömke
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.214

9.  Impact of artifacts on VOR gain measures by video-oculography in the acute vestibular syndrome.

Authors:  Georgios Mantokoudis; Ali S Saber Tehrani; Amy Wozniak; Karin Eibenberger; Jorge C Kattah; Cynthia I Guede; David S Zee; David E Newman-Toker
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  [Management of acute vertigo and dizziness : Patients in emergency departments in Germany].

Authors:  J Löhler; D Eßer; B Wollenberg; L E Walther
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.