James J Goedert1, Luke C Swenson, Laura A Napolitano, Mojgan Haddad, Kathryn Anastos, Howard Minkoff, Mary Young, Alexandra Levine, Oluwatoyin Adeyemi, Eric C Seaberg, Bradley Aouizerat, Charles S Rabkin, P Richard Harrigan, Nancy A Hessol. 1. *Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; †British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada; ‡Monogram Biosciences, South San Francisco, CA; §Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; ‖Maimonides Medical Center and State University of New York Health Sciences Center at Brooklyn, New York, NY; ¶Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; #City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; **Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; ††Departments of Medicine, Stroger Hospital and Rush University, Chicago, IL; ‡‡Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; §§Department of Physiological Nursing; and ‖‖The Institute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and Departments of ¶¶Clinical Pharmacy; and ##Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the risk of female breast cancer associated with HIV-CXCR4 (X4) tropism as determined by various genotypic measures. METHODS: A breast cancer case-control study, with pairwise comparisons of tropism determination methods, was conducted. From the Women's Interagency HIV Study repository, one stored plasma specimen was selected from 25 HIV-infected cases near the breast cancer diagnosis date and 75 HIV-infected control women matched for age and calendar date. HIV-gp120 V3 sequences were derived by Sanger population sequencing (PS) and 454-pyro deep sequencing (DS). Sequencing-based HIV-X4 tropism was defined using the geno2pheno algorithm, with both high-stringency DS [false-positive rate (3.5) and 2% X4 cutoff], and lower stringency DS (false-positive rate, 5.75 and 15% X4 cutoff). Concordance of tropism results by PS, DS, and previously performed phenotyping was assessed with kappa (κ) statistics. Case-control comparisons used exact P values and conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: In 74 women (19 cases, 55 controls) with complete results, prevalence of HIV-X4 by PS was 5% in cases vs 29% in controls (P = 0.06; odds ratio, 0.14; confidence interval: 0.003 to 1.03). Smaller case-control prevalence differences were found with high-stringency DS (21% vs 36%, P = 0.32), lower stringency DS (16% vs 35%, P = 0.18), and phenotyping (11% vs 31%, P = 0.10). HIV-X4 tropism concordance was best between PS and lower stringency DS (93%, κ = 0.83). Other pairwise concordances were 82%-92% (κ = 0.56-0.81). Concordance was similar among cases and controls. CONCLUSIONS: HIV-X4 defined by population sequencing (PS) had good agreement with lower stringency DS and was significantly associated with lower odds of breast cancer.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the risk of female breast cancer associated with HIV-CXCR4 (X4) tropism as determined by various genotypic measures. METHODS: A breast cancer case-control study, with pairwise comparisons of tropism determination methods, was conducted. From the Women's Interagency HIV Study repository, one stored plasma specimen was selected from 25 HIV-infected cases near the breast cancer diagnosis date and 75 HIV-infected control women matched for age and calendar date. HIV-gp120 V3 sequences were derived by Sanger population sequencing (PS) and 454-pyro deep sequencing (DS). Sequencing-based HIV-X4 tropism was defined using the geno2pheno algorithm, with both high-stringency DS [false-positive rate (3.5) and 2% X4 cutoff], and lower stringency DS (false-positive rate, 5.75 and 15% X4 cutoff). Concordance of tropism results by PS, DS, and previously performed phenotyping was assessed with kappa (κ) statistics. Case-control comparisons used exact P values and conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: In 74 women (19 cases, 55 controls) with complete results, prevalence of HIV-X4 by PS was 5% in cases vs 29% in controls (P = 0.06; odds ratio, 0.14; confidence interval: 0.003 to 1.03). Smaller case-control prevalence differences were found with high-stringency DS (21% vs 36%, P = 0.32), lower stringency DS (16% vs 35%, P = 0.18), and phenotyping (11% vs 31%, P = 0.10). HIV-X4 tropism concordance was best between PS and lower stringency DS (93%, κ = 0.83). Other pairwise concordances were 82%-92% (κ = 0.56-0.81). Concordance was similar among cases and controls. CONCLUSIONS: HIV-X4 defined by population sequencing (PS) had good agreement with lower stringency DS and was significantly associated with lower odds of breast cancer.
Authors: H Deng; R Liu; W Ellmeier; S Choe; D Unutmaz; M Burkhart; P Di Marzio; S Marmon; R E Sutton; C M Hill; C B Davis; S C Peiper; T J Schall; D R Littman; N R Landau Journal: Nature Date: 1996-06-20 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: A Müller; B Homey; H Soto; N Ge; D Catron; M E Buchanan; T McClanahan; E Murphy; W Yuan; S N Wagner; J L Barrera; A Mohar; E Verástegui; A Zlotnik Journal: Nature Date: 2001-03-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: S E Barkan; S L Melnick; S Preston-Martin; K Weber; L A Kalish; P Miotti; M Young; R Greenblatt; H Sacks; J Feldman Journal: Epidemiology Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: M Koot; I P Keet; A H Vos; R E de Goede; M T Roos; R A Coutinho; F Miedema; P T Schellekens; M Tersmette Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1993-05-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: H Schuitemaker; M Koot; N A Kootstra; M W Dercksen; R E de Goede; R P van Steenwijk; J M Lange; J K Schattenkerk; F Miedema; M Tersmette Journal: J Virol Date: 1992-03 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Bernd C Schmid; Margarethe Rudas; Günther A Rezniczek; Sepp Leodolter; Robert Zeillinger Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Mark A Jensen; Fu-Sheng Li; Angélique B van 't Wout; David C Nickle; Daniel Shriner; Hong-Xia He; Sherry McLaughlin; Raj Shankarappa; Joseph B Margolick; James I Mullins Journal: J Virol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 5.103