Literature DB >> 25321155

Image registration accuracy of an in-house developed patient transport system for PET/CT+MR and SPECT+CT imaging.

Andrei Samarin1, Felix P Kuhn, Fredrik Brandsberg, Gustav von Schulthess, Irene A Burger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the registration accuracy of a newly developed patient shuttle system that can integrate different scanners by patient transfer without repositioning for 'hardware'-based image fusion. We aimed to assess the registration accuracy of image fusion in two different settings: a trimodality PET/CT+MR system and a SPECT+CT system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 43 patients underwent either sequential PET/CT and MR (n=31) or sequential SPECT and diagnostic CT (D-CT) (n=12). A side-loading patient shuttle system was used for patient transport. For PET/CT+MR, hardware-only coregistration was performed and then validated with anatomical landmarks on CT and MR. SPECT+D-CT image fusion was performed with external cobalt-57 markers and manual fusion. Registration accuracy was analysed by anatomical landmarks on the attenuation correction CT and the D-CT.
RESULTS: For the PET/CT+MR system, the mean offset between original CT and MR images in all 31 patients was 8.1±5.7 mm in the X-axis, 5±4 mm in the Y-axis and 4.9±5.6 mm in the Z-axis. The validation of the cobalt-57 marker-assisted SPECT+D-CT fusion yielded offsets of 0.7±1.7 mm in the X-axis, 2.1±1.7 mm in the Y-axis and 0.8±1.8 mm in the Z-axis.
CONCLUSION: Sequential PET/CT+MR and SPECT+D-CT imaging using a dedicated patient shuttle system is feasible, resulting in mean offsets between data sets of 10.7 mm using the gantry laser system and 2.4 mm with fiducial markers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25321155     DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  3 in total

1.  Characterization of positioning uncertainties in PET-CT-MR trimodality solutions for radiotherapy.

Authors:  Pauline Hinault; Isabelle Gardin; Pierrick Gouel; Pierre Decazes; Sebastien Thureau; Ovidiu Veresezan; Henri Souchay; Pierre Vera; David Gensanne
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.243

2.  Diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/MRI and WB-DW-MRI in the evaluation of lymphoma: a prospective comparison to standard FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Ken Herrmann; Marcelo Queiroz; Martin W Huellner; Felipe de Galiza Barbosa; Andreas Buck; Niklaus Schaefer; Paul Stolzman; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 3.  Radiolabeled theranostics: magnetic and gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Saeideh Same; Ayuob Aghanejad; Sattar Akbari Nakhjavani; Jaleh Barar; Yadollah Omidi
Journal:  Bioimpacts       Date:  2016-09-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.