Cameron Moffatt1, Ranil Appuhamy2, Will Andrew3, Sandy Wynn4, Jan Roberts5, Karina Kennedy6. 1. OzFoodNet, Communicable Disease Control Section, Health Protection Service, ACT Government Health Directorate, Canberra, Australia . 2. Office of the Chief Health Officer, ACT Government Health Directorate, Canberra, Australia . 3. Territory and Municipal Services Directorate, Canberra, Australia . 4. Infection Control, Health Protection Service, ACT Government Health Directorate, Canberra, Australia . 5. Infection Control, Community-based Services, ACT Health Directorate, Canberra, Australia . 6. Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canberra Hospital and Health Services, Canberra, Australia .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In April and June 2012, two outbreaks of Campylobacter gastroenteritis were investigated in an Australian aged-care facility (ACF); a Campylobacter-positive puppy was identified as a potential source of infection. METHODS: An expert panel was convened to assess transmission risk from the puppy to elderly residents and to guide further public health action. Criteria considered as part of the panel's assessment included the puppy's infectivity, the bacterium's transmissibility, puppy-resident contact, infection control and cleaning practices and animal management at the facility. A literature review was used to assist the panel, with a final risk being determined using a likelihood and consequence matrix. RESULTS: The panel determined that the setting and low infective dose made transmission likely despite varying degrees of contact between the puppy and cases. While infection control practices were generally appropriate, the facility's animal policy did not adequately address potential zoonotic risk. CONCLUSION: In summary, puppies should not be considered as companion animals in ACFs due to high rates of Campylobacter carriage and the underlying susceptibility of the elderly. Infection control and animal policies in ACFs should reflect an awareness of zoonotic disease potential.
INTRODUCTION: In April and June 2012, two outbreaks of Campylobacter gastroenteritis were investigated in an Australian aged-care facility (ACF); a Campylobacter-positive puppy was identified as a potential source of infection. METHODS: An expert panel was convened to assess transmission risk from the puppy to elderly residents and to guide further public health action. Criteria considered as part of the panel's assessment included the puppy's infectivity, the bacterium's transmissibility, puppy-resident contact, infection control and cleaning practices and animal management at the facility. A literature review was used to assist the panel, with a final risk being determined using a likelihood and consequence matrix. RESULTS: The panel determined that the setting and low infective dose made transmission likely despite varying degrees of contact between the puppy and cases. While infection control practices were generally appropriate, the facility's animal policy did not adequately address potential zoonotic risk. CONCLUSION: In summary, puppies should not be considered as companion animals in ACFs due to high rates of Campylobacter carriage and the underlying susceptibility of the elderly. Infection control and animal policies in ACFs should reflect an awareness of zoonotic disease potential.
Authors: T F Wolfs; B Duim; S P Geelen; A Rigter; F Thomson-Carter; A Fleer; J A Wagenaar Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2001-02-23 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Heidi DiSalvo; Donna Haiduven; Nancy Johnson; Valentine V Reyes; Carmen P Hench; Rosemary Shaw; David A Stevens Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Sandra L Lefebvre; Gail C Golab; E'lise Christensen; Louisa Castrodale; Kathy Aureden; Anne Bialachowski; Nigel Gumley; Judy Robinson; Andrew Peregrine; Marilyn Benoit; Mary Lou Card; Liz Van Horne; J Scott Weese Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Kim O Gradel; Henrik C Schønheyder; Claus Dethlefsen; Brian Kristensen; Tove Ejlertsen; Henrik Nielsen Journal: J Infect Date: 2008-07-25 Impact factor: 6.072
Authors: Lavin A Joseph; Louise K Francois Watkins; Jessica Chen; Kaitlin A Tagg; Christy Bennett; Hayat Caidi; Jason P Folster; Mark E Laughlin; Lia Koski; Rachel Silver; Lauren Stevenson; Scott Robertson; Janet Pruckler; Megin Nichols; Hannes Pouseele; Heather A Carleton; Colin Basler; Cindy R Friedman; Aimee Geissler; Kelley B Hise; Rachael D Aubert Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Danielle M Cribb; Liana Varrone; Rhiannon L Wallace; Angus T McLure; James J Smith; Russell J Stafford; Dieter M Bulach; Linda A Selvey; Simon M Firestone; Nigel P French; Mary Valcanis; Emily J Fearnley; Timothy S Sloan-Gardner; Trudy Graham; Kathryn Glass; Martyn D Kirk Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 3.667
Authors: Martha P Montgomery; Scott Robertson; Lia Koski; Ellen Salehi; Lauren M Stevenson; Rachel Silver; Preethi Sundararaman; Amber Singh; Lavin A Joseph; Mary Beth Weisner; Eric Brandt; Melanie Prarat; Rick Bokanyi; Jessica C Chen; Jason P Folster; Christy T Bennett; Louise K Francois Watkins; Rachael D Aubert; Alvina Chu; Jennifer Jackson; Jason Blanton; Amber Ginn; Kirtana Ramadugu; Danielle Stanek; Jamie DeMent; Jing Cui; Yan Zhang; Colin Basler; Cindy R Friedman; Aimee L Geissler; Samuel J Crowe; Natasha Dowell; Staci Dixon; Laura Whitlock; Ian Williams; Michael A Jhung; Megin C Nichols; Sietske de Fijter; Mark E Laughlin Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2018-09-21 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Anna Tomusiak-Plebanek; Martyna Mruk; Sybilla Rząca; Magdalena Strus; Zbigniew Arent Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 2.741