| Literature DB >> 25320632 |
Zvenyika Ar Gomo1, James G Hakim2, Sarah A Walker3, Willard Tinago4, Gibson Mandozana4, Cissy Kityo5, Paula Munderi6, Elly Katabira7, Andrew Reid2, Diana M Gibb3, Charles F Gilks8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of HIV-infected patients in sub-Saharan Africa are exposed to antiretroviral therapy (ART), but there are few data on lipid changes on first-line ART, and even fewer on second-line.Entities:
Keywords: African setting; Antiretroviral therapy; Lipid profile changes; Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; Protease inhibitors
Year: 2014 PMID: 25320632 PMCID: PMC4197260 DOI: 10.1186/1742-6405-11-32
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Res Ther ISSN: 1742-6405 Impact factor: 2.250
Demographic data, BMI, CD4 count and plasma lipid levels at initiation of second-line ART (switch from first-line ART)
| At switch to second-line | n (%) | TC mean (se) | †P | LDL-C mean (se) | †P | HDL-C mean (se) | †P | TG mean (se) | †P | TC/HDL-C ratio mean (se) | †P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 65 | 3.4 (0.1) | 1.8 (0.1) | 0.7 (0.03) | 1.4 (0.1) | 4.9 (0.2) | |||||
| Sex | |||||||||||
| Females | 31 (48%) | 3.8 (0.2) | 0.004 | 2.1 (0.2) | 0.006 | 0.8 (0.04) | 0.05 | 1.3 (0.1) | 0.80 | 4.9 (0.2) | 0.66 |
| Males | 34 (52%) | 3.0 (0.1) | 1.5 (0.1) | 0.7 (0.04) | 1.8 (0.2) | 4.8 (0.3) | |||||
| Age (years) | |||||||||||
| <35 | 17 (26%) | 3.4 (0.2) | 0.61 | 1.7 (0.2) | 0.7 | 0.8 (0.1) | 0.78 | 1.3 (0.3) | 0.10 | 4.8 (0.4) | 0.46 |
| 35-44 | 33 (51%) | 3.4 (0.2) | 1.9 (0.1) | 0.7 (0.1) | 1.5 (0.1) | 4.9 (0.2) | |||||
| ≥45 | 15 (23%) | 3.2 (0.4) | 1.7 (0.2) | 0.7 (0.1) | 1.5 (0.3) | 4.8 (0.3) | |||||
| ¥BMI (kg/m2) | |||||||||||
| <18.5 | 10 (16%) | 3.0 (0.3) | 0.11 | 1.6 (0.2) | 0.04 | 0.8 (0.1) | 0.33 | 1.0 (0.3) | 0.46 | 4.2 (0.4) | 0.45 |
| 18.5-24.9 | 41 (67%) | 3.4 (0.1) | 1.8 (0.1) | 0.7 (0.1) | 1.6 (0.2) | 4.9 (0.2) | |||||
| 25-29.9 | 8 (13%) | 3.4 (0.3) | 1.8 (0.2) | 0.7 (0.1) | 1.4 (0.2) | 4.8 (0.2) | |||||
| 30-39.9 | 2 (3%) | 4.0 (0.1) | 2.4 (0.1) | 0.7 (0.1) | 1.7 (0.9) | 5.5 (0.5) | |||||
| CD4 cell/mm3 | |||||||||||
| <100 | 57 (88%) | 3.3 (0.1) | 0.95 | 1.7 (0.1) | 0.47 | 0.7 (0.02) | 0.64 | 1.5 (0.1) | 0.85 | 4.8 (0.2) | 0.73 |
| 100-199 | 6 (9%) | 3.9 (0.9) | 2.1 (0.6) | 0.7 (0.1) | 1.4 (0.2) | 6.0 (1.0) | |||||
| ≥200 | 2 (3%) | 4.0 (0.6) | 2.2 (0.7) | 1.2 (0.1) | 0.6 (0.2) | 3.5 (0.8) | |||||
| ART-during first-line | |||||||||||
| ZDV/d4T + 3TC + TDF | 56 (86%) | 3.4 (0.1) | 0.59 | 1.8 (0.1) | 0.30 | 0.7 (0.03) | 0.02 | 1.5 (0.1) | 0.04 | 5.0 (0.2) | 0.09 |
| ±ZDV/d4T++NVP | 9 (14%) | 3.4 (0.2) | 1.9 (0.2) | 0.9 (0.10) | 0.9 (0.1) | 4.0 (0.4) |
†P-values for continuous BMI, Age and CD4 vs lipids calculated using Spearman correlation.
¥4 participants with missing weight at initiation of second –line ART.
±Including 3 patients who had substituted NVP- > TDF for hepatotoxicity (2) or anti-TB therapy (1) during first-line.
TC: total cholesterol, LDL-C: low density lipoprotein–cholesterol, HDL-C: high density lipoprotein–cholesterol, TG: triglyceride, BMI: Body mass index. All lipid levels are expressed in mmol/L.
BMI, CD4 Count and lipid levels at ≥48 weeks on second-line ART
| 48 weeks after switch to second-line | n (%) | TC mean (se) | †P | LDL-C mean (se) | †P | HDL-C mean (se) | †P | TG mean (se) | †P | TC/HDL-C ratio mean (se) | †P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 65 | 5.4 (0.2) | 2.9 (0.1) | 1.2 (0.05) | 1.9(0.2) | 4.9 (0.3) | |||||
| Sex | |||||||||||
| Females | 31 (48%) | 5.8 (0.2) | 0.03 | 3.2 (0.2) | 0.003 | 1.3 (0.07) | 0.03 | 1.8 (0.2) | 0.71 | 4.6 (0.2) | 0.69 |
| Males | 34 (52%) | 5.1 (0.2) | 2.5 (0.1) | 1.1 (0.06) | 2.0 (0.2) | 5.1 (0.4) | |||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | |||||||||||
| <18.5 | 4 (6%) | 4.8 (0.4) | 0.04 | 2.6 (0.5) | 0.05 | 1.2 (0.3) | 0.57 | 1.0 (0.2) | 0.003 | 4.6 (0.9) | 0.55 |
| 18.5-24.9 | 36 (56%) | 5.2 (0.2) | 2.7 (0.2) | 1.2 (0.1) | 1.5 (0.1) | 5.0 (0.4) | |||||
| 25-29.9 | 21 (32%) | 5.8 (0.3) | 3.1 (0.2) | 1.2 (0.1) | 2.4 (0.3) | 4.8 (0.4) | |||||
| 30-39.9 | 4 (6%) | 5.9 (0.3) | 3.1 (0.4) | 1.2 (0.4) | 2.8 (1.1) | 5.0 (1.0) | |||||
| CD4 cell/mm3 | |||||||||||
| <100 | 2 (3%) | 4.6 (0.9) | 0.93 | 2.6 (0.6) | 0.28 | 1.1 (0.1) | 0.10 | 0.8 (0.02) | 0.24 | 4.2 (1.1) | 0.31 |
| 100-199 | 10 (15%) | 5.7 (0.2) | 3.0 (0.2) | 1.4 (0.1) | 1.8 (0.5) | 4.1 (0.4) | |||||
| ≥200 | 53 (82%) | 5.4 (0.2) | 2.8 (0.1) | 1.2 (0.1) | 1.9 (0.2) | 5.1 (0.3) |
TC: total cholesterol, LDL-C: low density lipoprotein–cholesterol, HDL-C: high density lipoprotein–cholesterol, TG: triglyceride, BMI: Body mass index. All lipid levels are expressed in mmol/L.
†P-values for continuous BMI and CD4 vs. lipids calculated using Spearman correlation.
Plasma Lipid levels changes from switch to ≥48 weeks on second-line ART
| Initiation of second-line (mean; sd) | 48 weeks later (mean; sd) | Changes (SE) | % Change | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 65 | n = 65 | n = 65 | |||
| TC | 3.4 (1.0) | 5.4 (1.2) | +2.0 (0.1) | 59% | <0.001 |
| LDL-C | 1.8 (0.7) | 2.8 (0.9) | +1.1 (0.1) | 61% | <0.001 |
| HDL-C | 0.7 (0.2) | 1.2 (0.4) | +0.5 (0.05) | 71% | <0.001 |
| TG | 1.4 (1.0) | 1.9 (1.3) | +0.4 (0.2) | 29% | 0.01 |
| TC/HDLC-C | 4.9 (1.4) | 4.9 (2.1) | +0.0 (0.3) | 0% | 0.94 |
Figure 1Fasting plasma lipids at switch to second-line and 48 weeks later. Footnote 1: Total Cholesterol (TC), Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) levels were statistically significantly increased ≥48 weeks on switching to second-line ART regimens (p < 0.001).
Multivariable linear regression analyses for factors associated with changes in lipid levels from switch to ≥48 weeks on second-line ART
| At switch to second- line * | n (%) or median (IQR) | TC effect (se) | P | LDL-C effect (se) | P | HDL-Ceffect (se) | P | TG effect (se) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||||||
| Females | 32 (48%) | +04 (0.3) | 0.14 | +0.5 (0.2) | 0.04 | +0.1 (0.08) | 0.26 | −0.07 (0.3) | 0.81 |
| Age (per 10 year increase) | 38 (34-43) | +0.4 (0.2) | 0.02 | +0.3 (0.1) | 0.06 | +0.1 (0.06) | 0.02 | −0.04 (0.2) | 0.87 |
| BMI (kg/m2) per 2 units | 21 (17-26) | +0.02 (0.03) | 0.47 | +0.02 (0.03) | 0.41 | −0.02 (0.01) | 0.08 | +0.08 (0.04)§ | 0.07 |
| NVP | 50 (77%) | +1.3 (0.4) | 0.004 | +0.6 (0.3) | 0.10 | +0.6 (0.2) | <0.001 | +0.4 (0.6) | 0.43 |
| EFV | 9 (14%) | +1.6 (0.5) | 0.003 | +0.9 (0.4) | 0.03 | +0.4 (0.2) | 0.02 | +0.4 (0.6) | 0.57 |
| ddI | 34 (52%) | −0.04 (0.3) | 0.88 | −0.1 (02) | 0.54 | −0.1 (0.1) | 0.21 | +0.2 (0.3) | 0.54 |
Al l models are adjusted for baseline lipid level.
§BMI at week 48 (rather than at switch to second-line) as this was a better predictor.
*Reference category: man aged 40 years with BMI 25 at switch, receiving LPV/r plus NRTIs (no NNRTI) without ddI as their second-line regimen.