Literature DB >> 25320517

Potential prognostic, diagnostic and therapeutic markers for human gastric cancer.

Ming-Ming Tsai1, Chia-Siu Wang1, Chung-Ying Tsai1, Hsiang-Cheng Chi1, Yi-Hsin Tseng1, Kwang-Huei Lin1.   

Abstract

The high incidence of gastric cancer (GC) and its consequent mortality rate severely threaten human health. GC is frequently not diagnosed until a relatively advanced stage. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment. Thus, early screening and diagnosis are critical for improving prognoses in patients with GC. Gastroscopy with biopsy is an appropriate method capable of aiding the diagnosis of specific early GC tumor types; however, the stress caused by this method together with it being excessively expensive makes it difficult to use it as a routine method for screening for GC on a population basis. The currently used tumor marker assays for detecting GC are simple and rapid, but their use is limited by their low sensitivity and specificity. In recent years, several markers have been identified and tested for their clinical relevance in the management of GC. Here, we review the serum-based tumor markers for GC and their clinical significance, focusing on discoveries from microarray/proteomics research. We also review tissue-based GC tumor markers and their clinical application, focusing on discoveries from immunohistochemical research. This review provides a brief description of various tumor markers for the purposes of diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutics, and we include markers already in clinical practice and various forthcoming biomarkers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; Prognosis; Serum-based; Tissue-based; Tumor marker

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25320517      PMCID: PMC4194563          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  129 in total

1.  Reg IV: a promising marker of hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Zhennan Gu; Mark A Rubin; Yu Yang; Samuel E Deprimo; Hongjuan Zhao; Steven Horvath; James D Brooks; Massimo Loda; Robert E Reiter
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Transcriptional upregulation of SPARC, in response to c-Jun overexpression, contributes to increased motility and invasion of MCF7 breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Joseph Briggs; Sandrine Chamboredon; Marc Castellazzi; Julie A Kerry; Timothy J Bos
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  A multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ichiro Oda; Daizo Saito; Masahiro Tada; Hiroyasu Iishi; Satoshi Tanabe; Tsuneo Oyama; Toshihiko Doi; Yoshihide Otani; Junko Fujisaki; Yoichi Ajioka; Tsutomu Hamada; Haruhiro Inoue; Takuji Gotoda; Shigeaki Yoshida
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Expression of the tumor suppressor protein 14-3-3 sigma is down-regulated in invasive transitional cell carcinomas of the urinary bladder undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  José M A Moreira; Pavel Gromov; Julio E Celis
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Serum HCG beta and CA 72-4 are stronger prognostic factors than CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 242 in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Johanna Louhimo; Henrik Alfthan; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Caj Haglund
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.935

6.  Molecular mechanism of stomach carcinogenesis.

Authors:  E Tahara
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Identification, characterization and utilization of tumor cell selectin ligands in the design of colon cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Susan N Thomas; Ziqiu Tong; Kathleen J Stebe; Konstantinos Konstantopoulos
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.875

8.  Clinical significance and prognostic value of CA72-4 compared with CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  M Ychou; J Duffour; A Kramar; S Gourgou; J Grenier
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.434

9.  Modulation of angiogenic and inflammatory response in glioblastoma by hypoxia.

Authors:  Anastasia Murat; Eugenia Migliavacca; S Farzana Hussain; Amy B Heimberger; Isabelle Desbaillets; Marie-France Hamou; Curzio Rüegg; Roger Stupp; Mauro Delorenzi; Monika E Hegi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Elevated CAIX Expression is Associated with an Increased Risk of Distant Failure in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  John P Kirkpatrick; Zahid N Rabbani; Rex C Bentley; Matt E Hardee; Seth Karol; Jeffrey Meyer; Egbert Oosterwijk; Laura Havrilesky; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Zeljko Vujaskovic; Mark W Dewhirst; Ellen L Jones
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2008-02-01
View more
  12 in total

1.  Methylation status of TRAF2 is associated with the diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Juan Zhang; Wei-Jie Dai; Xiao-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-11-01

2.  A long non-coding RNA signature to improve prognosis prediction of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Zhu; Xianglong Tian; Chenyang Yu; Chaoqin Shen; Tingting Yan; Jie Hong; Zheng Wang; Jing-Yuan Fang; Haoyan Chen
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 27.401

3.  PharmaKoVariome database for supporting genetic testing.

Authors:  Jungeun Kim; Jae-Pil Choi; Min Sun Kim; Jong Bhak
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 4.462

4.  AMPK activator AICAR promotes 5-FU-induced apoptosis in gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  Yan Wu; Yijun Qi; Hu Liu; Xiaoshan Wang; Huaqing Zhu; Zhengguang Wang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 5.  Cullin family proteins and tumorigenesis: genetic association and molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Zhi Chen; Jie Sui; Fan Zhang; Caiguo Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 6.  Recent advances in mass spectrometry-based proteomics of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Changwon Kang; Yejin Lee; J Eugene Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Upregulated long intergenic noncoding RNA KRT18P55 acts as a novel biomarker for the progression of intestinal-type gastric cancer.

Authors:  Bin Ma; Jiajun Wang; Yongxi Song; Peng Gao; Jingxu Sun; Xiaowan Chen; Yuchong Yang; Zhenning Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Tristetraprolin inhibits gastric cancer progression through suppression of IL-33.

Authors:  Kaiyuan Deng; Hao Wang; Ting Shan; Yigang Chen; Hong Zhou; Qin Zhao; Jiazeng Xia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Identification of serum proteins AHSG, FGA and APOA-I as diagnostic biomarkers for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Feiyu Shi; Hong Wu; Kai Qu; Qi Sun; Fanni Li; Chengxin Shi; Yaguang Li; Xiaofan Xiong; Qian Qin; Tianyu Yu; Xin Jin; Liang Cheng; Qingxia Wei; Yingchao Li; Junjun She
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.988

10.  Corosolic acid reduces 5‑FU chemoresistance in human gastric cancer cells by activating AMPK.

Authors:  Jun Beom Park; Jin Sun Lee; Myung Sun Lee; Eun Young Cha; Soyeon Kim; Ji Young Sul
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.