Literature DB >> 25320207

Online resources for shoulder instability: what are patients reading?

Grant H Garcia1, Samuel A Taylor1, Christopher J Dy1, Alexander Christ1, Ronak M Patel2, Joshua S Dines3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evaluations of the medical literature suggest that many online sites provide poor-quality information. The purpose of our study was to investigate the value of online resources for patient education about shoulder instability.
METHODS: Three search terms ("shoulder instability," "loose shoulder," and "shoulder dislocation") were entered into three Internet search engines. Three orthopaedic residents independently gauged the quality and accuracy of the information with use of a set of predetermined scoring criteria, in addition to noting whether or not four potential surgery options were mentioned. The readability of the web sites was evaluated with use of the Flesch-Kincaid score.
RESULTS: Eighty-two unique web sites were evaluated. Quality and accuracy were significantly higher with use of the term "shoulder instability" compared with the term "loose shoulder" (quality, p < 0.001; accuracy, p = 0.001). However, the reading level was significantly more advanced for the "shoulder instability" web sites (p < 0.001). Quality was significantly higher on web sites with reading levels above the eighth grade level (p = 0.001) (88% of web sites). Only twenty-three sites (28%) mentioned surgical options for shoulder instability, and of these, only eight mentioned thermal capsulorrhaphy as a primary treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Online information regarding shoulder instability is often inaccurate and/or at an inappropriately high reading level. The quality of information is highly dependent on the specific search term used. Clinicians need to be aware of the information that is available online and should help direct patients to proper sites and guide Internet search terms.
Copyright © 2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25320207     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Patient Resources for the Management of Articular Cartilage Defects.

Authors:  Dean Wang; Rohit G Jayakar; Natalie L Leong; Michael P Leathers; Riley J Williams; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Social media and your practice: navigating the surgeon-patient relationship.

Authors:  Alexander S McLawhorn; Ivan De Martino; Keith A Fehring; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

3.  The Quality of Open-Access Video-Based Orthopaedic Instructional Content for the Shoulder Physical Exam is Inconsistent.

Authors:  Ekaterina Urch; Samuel A Taylor; Elizabeth Cody; Peter D Fabricant; Jayme C Burket; Stephen J O'Brien; David M Dines; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-06-29

Review 4.  Online Patient Education Materials for Common Sports Injuries Are Written at Too-High of a Reading Level: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Youssef Abdullah; Aaron Alokozai; Samantha O'Connell; Mary K Mulcahey
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-11

5.  Stem Cells in Orthopedic Web Information: An Assessment with the DISCERN Tool.

Authors:  Michele Venosa; Alessio Tarantino; Irene Schettini; Roberto Padua; Maria Grazia Cifone; Vittorio Calvisi; Emilio Romanini
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  The Quality of Online Orthopaedic Oncology Information.

Authors:  Ralph T Zade; Jason P Tartaglione; Ernest Chisena; Curtis T Adams; Matthew R DiCaprio
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-02-25

7.  Misinformation in News Coverage of Professional and College Athlete Musculoskeletal Ailments.

Authors:  Layla A Haidar; Joost T P Kortlever; David Ring
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-01

8.  The Quality of Online Resources Available to Patients Interested in Knee Biologic Therapies Is Poor.

Authors:  Benedict U Nwachukwu; Ryan C Rauck; Cynthia A Kahlenberg; Chukwuma Nwachukwu; William W Schairer; Riley J Williams; David W Altchek; Answorth A Allen
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2018-08-08

9.  Quality of internet-based decision aids for shoulder arthritis: what are patients reading?

Authors:  Jeremy S Somerson; Aaron J Bois; Jeffrey Jeng; Kamal I Bohsali; John W Hinchey; Michael A Wirth
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Online Resources for Rotator Cuff Repair: What are Patients Reading?

Authors:  Brandon T Goldenberg; William W Schairer; Travis J Dekker; Lucca Lacheta; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.