Sara Bares1, Jennifer Steinbeck2, Lauren Bence2, Abbe Kordik3, Mary Ellen Acree2, Jane Jih4, Jeanne Farnan2, Sydeaka Watson5, Kenneth Rasinski2, John Schneider6, David Pitrak2. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA sara.bares@unmc.edu. 2. Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. Mercy Hospital and Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA. 5. Department of Health Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 6. Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA Department of Health Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We sought to measure resident physician knowledge of HIV epidemiology and screening guidelines, attitudes toward testing, testing practices, and barriers and facilitators to routine testing. METHODS: Resident physicians in internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, and emergency medicine were surveyed. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 63% (162 of 259). Half knew details of the HIV screening guidelines, but few follow these recommendations. Less than one-third reported always or usually performing routine testing. A significant proportion reported only sometimes or never screening patients with risk factors. This was despite a strong belief that HIV screening improves patient care and public health. The most common barriers to testing were competing priorities and forgetting to order the test. Elimination of written consent and electronic reminders was identified as facilitators to routine testing. Although an institutional policy assigns responsibility for test notification and linkage of HIV-positive patients to care to the HIV care program, only 29% were aware of this. CONCLUSIONS: Few resident physicians routinely screen for HIV infection and some don't test patients with risk factors. While competing priorities remain a significant barrier, elimination of written consent form and electronic reminders has facilitated testing. Increasing the awareness of policies regarding test notification and linkage to care may improve screening.
BACKGROUND: We sought to measure resident physician knowledge of HIV epidemiology and screening guidelines, attitudes toward testing, testing practices, and barriers and facilitators to routine testing. METHODS: Resident physicians in internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, and emergency medicine were surveyed. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 63% (162 of 259). Half knew details of the HIV screening guidelines, but few follow these recommendations. Less than one-third reported always or usually performing routine testing. A significant proportion reported only sometimes or never screening patients with risk factors. This was despite a strong belief that HIV screening improves patient care and public health. The most common barriers to testing were competing priorities and forgetting to order the test. Elimination of written consent and electronic reminders was identified as facilitators to routine testing. Although an institutional policy assigns responsibility for test notification and linkage of HIV-positivepatients to care to the HIV care program, only 29% were aware of this. CONCLUSIONS: Few resident physicians routinely screen for HIV infection and some don't test patients with risk factors. While competing priorities remain a significant barrier, elimination of written consent form and electronic reminders has facilitated testing. Increasing the awareness of policies regarding test notification and linkage to care may improve screening.
Authors: Sara Bares; Rebecca Eavou; Clara Bertozzi-Villa; Michelle Taylor; Heather Hyland; Rachel McFadden; Sachin Shah; Mai T Pho; James Walter; Sameer Badlani; John Schneider; Nik Prachand; Nanette Benbow; David Pitrak Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2016 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Noemy De Rossi; Nicolas Dattner; Matthias Cavassini; Solange Peters; Olivier Hugli; Katharine E A Darling Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: John Bonnewell; Sarah Magaziner; Joseph L Fava; Madeline C Montgomery; Alexi Almonte; Michael Carey; Philip A Chan Journal: SAGE Open Med Date: 2020-02-04