Literature DB >> 25320068

The effects of relative food item size on optimal tooth cusp sharpness during brittle food item processing.

Michael A Berthaume1, Elizabeth R Dumont2, Laurie R Godfrey3, Ian R Grosse4.   

Abstract

Teeth are often assumed to be optimal for their function, which allows researchers to derive dietary signatures from tooth shape. Most tooth shape analyses normalize for tooth size, potentially masking the relationship between relative food item size and tooth shape. Here, we model how relative food item size may affect optimal tooth cusp radius of curvature (RoC) during the fracture of brittle food items using a parametric finite-element (FE) model of a four-cusped molar. Morphospaces were created for four different food item sizes by altering cusp RoCs to determine whether optimal tooth shape changed as food item size changed. The morphospaces were also used to investigate whether variation in efficiency metrics (i.e. stresses, energy and optimality) changed as food item size changed. We found that optimal tooth shape changed as food item size changed, but that all optimal morphologies were similar, with one dull cusp that promoted high stresses in the food item and three cusps that acted to stabilize the food item. There were also positive relationships between food item size and the coefficients of variation for stresses in food item and optimality, and negative relationships between food item size and the coefficients of variation for stresses in the enamel and strain energy absorbed by the food item. These results suggest that relative food item size may play a role in selecting for optimal tooth shape, and the magnitude of these selective forces may change depending on food item size and which efficiency metric is being selected.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Taguchi; brittle food item fracture; finite-element analysis; radius of curvature; relative food item size; tooth biomechanics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25320068      PMCID: PMC4223924          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  37 in total

1.  A three-dimensional analysis of enamel distribution patterns in human permanent first molars.

Authors:  Reiko T Kono; Gen Suwa; Toyohisa Tanijiri
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.633

Review 2.  Are we looking for loads in all the right places? New research directions for studying the masticatory apparatus of New World monkeys.

Authors:  Christopher J Vinyard; Andrea B Taylor; Mark F Teaford; Kenneth E Glander; Matthew J Ravosa; James B Rossie; Timothy M Ryan; Susan H Williams
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Virtual experiments, physical validation: dental morphology at the intersection of experiment and theory.

Authors:  P S L Anderson; E J Rayfield
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Cusp radius measurement through digital image analysis.

Authors:  Mihai Catalin Frunza; Cornel Suciu
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Tooth cusp sharpness as a dietary correlate in great apes.

Authors:  Michael A Berthaume
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  Mechanisms and causes of wear in tooth enamel: implications for hominin diets.

Authors:  Peter W Lucas; Ridwaan Omar; Khaled Al-Fadhalah; Abdulwahab S Almusallam; Amanda G Henry; Shaji Michael; Lidia Arockia Thai; Jörg Watzke; David S Strait; Anthony G Atkins
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Adaptation to hard-object feeding in sea otters and hominins.

Authors:  Paul J Constantino; James J-W Lee; Dylan Morris; Peter W Lucas; Adam Hartstone-Rose; Wah-Keat Lee; Nathaniel J Dominy; Andrew Cunningham; Mark Wagner; Brian R Lawn
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.895

8.  Nutritional benefits of Crematogaster mimosae ants and Acacia drepanolobium gum for patas monkeys and vervets in Laikipia, Kenya.

Authors:  Lynne A Isbell; Jessica M Rothman; Peter J Young; Kathleen Rudolph
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 2.868

9.  How does tooth cusp radius of curvature affect brittle food item processing?

Authors:  Michael A Berthaume; Elizabeth R Dumont; Laurie R Godfrey; Ian R Grosse
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Fracture behavior of human molars.

Authors:  Amanda J Keown; James J-W Lee; Mark B Bush
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.896

View more
  5 in total

1.  Grand Challenges in Comparative Tooth Biology.

Authors:  C Darrin Hulsey; Karly E Cohen; Zerina Johanson; Nidal Karagic; Axel Meyer; Craig T Miller; Alexa Sadier; Adam P Summers; Gareth J Fraser
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.326

2.  Molar biomechanical function in South African hominins Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus.

Authors:  Michael A Berthaume; Kornelius Kupczik
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 4.661

3.  Insulin-like growth factor 1 modulates bioengineered tooth morphogenesis.

Authors:  Toshihito Oyanagi; Nobuo Takeshita; Mamiko Hara; Etsuko Ikeda; Toko Chida; Daisuke Seki; Michiko Yoshida; Masahiro Seiryu; Ikuko Takano; Seiji Kimura; Masamitsu Oshima; Takashi Tsuji; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  The landscape of tooth shape: Over 20 years of dental topography in primates.

Authors:  Michael A Berthaume; Vincent Lazzari; Franck Guy
Journal:  Evol Anthropol       Date:  2020-07-20

5.  Effects of cropping, smoothing, triangle count, and mesh resolution on 6 dental topographic metrics.

Authors:  Michael A Berthaume; Julia Winchester; Kornelius Kupczik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.