| Literature DB >> 25319747 |
Agneta Anderzén-Carlsson1, Zeni C Lamy2, Maria Tingvall3, Mats Eriksson4.
Abstract
AIM: To synthesize and interpret qualitative research findings focusing on parental experiences of skin-to-skin care (SSC) for newborn infants.Entities:
Keywords: Kangaroo mother care; meta-study; meta-synthesis; newborn infant; qualitative research; skin-to-skin care
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25319747 PMCID: PMC4197398 DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v9.24907
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being ISSN: 1748-2623
Studies included in the meta-synthesis.
| Author (academic degree, profession), year of publication, country of study | Aim of the study | Theoretical orientation (T) | Population studied (P) | Major findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affonso (RN, professor), Wahlberg (RN, professor), Persson (RN), | To identify and compare themes based on the reactions of two groups of mothers, using a cognitive adaptation framework. | T: Cognitive adaptation framework. | P: Sub-group of 33 healthy mothers, mean age 26.5 y (16–37 y). Total study: 66 mothers providing or not providing SSC. | According to the framework of the cognitive adaptation theory, the mothers searched for meaning and described a sense of mastery as well as self-enhancement. |
| Affonso (RN, professor), Bosque (RN, MS), Wahlberg (RN, professor), Brady (MD, neonatologist), | To explore the effects of KMC on mothers’ reactions | T: Cognitive adaptation framework. | P: 6 mothers (26–38 y). | SSC via the KMC method facilitates psychological healing and regaining the mothering role in an intensive care nursery. |
| Arrivabene (RN, MS), Tyrell (RN, professor), | To describe the mothers’ experiences of KMC, analyze them in the light of KMC principles, and discuss the mothers’ contributions based on the meanings of their experiences of KMC and thus implications for nursing practice. | M: Focus groups | P: 13 mothers (18–40 y) with low socioeconomic status in a NICU. | Increased bonding between mother and baby; reduction of the infant's separation from the family; increased competence and confidence on the part of the parents even before discharge; improved relationship between the mother and the rest of the family, within the family, and with the team taking care of the baby. |
| Blomqvist (RN), Hedberg Nyqvist (RN, assoc. professor), | To investigate mothers’ experiences of KMC. | M: Retrospective survey. | P: 10 mothers answered the open-ended questions. | The mothers’ experiences were predominantly positive. Negative comments concerned lack of information. Some mothers perceived the care during the night as exhausting. |
| Blomqvist (RN), Rubertsson (midwife, assoc. professor), Kylbert (PhD, nutritionist), Jöreskog (PhD), Hedberg Nyqvist (RN, assoc. professor), | To describe fathers’ experiences of providing their preterm infants with KMC. | M: Semistructured interviews. | P: 7 first-time fathers, age 25–36 y. | The fathers’ opportunity for being close to their infants facilitated attainment of their paternal role. They were active agents in their infant's care. The physical environment and conflicting staff statements influenced their experience. |
| Blomqvist (RN), Frölund (midwife), Rubertsson (midwife, assoc. professor), Hedberg Nyqvist (RN, assoc. professor), | To identify factors that parents of preterm infants perceived as supportive factors or barriers for their performance of KMC | M: Retrospective survey. | P: 76 mothers, 74 fathers | Four categories were identified regarding support and barriers for parents’ performance of KMC: parent-related factors, time, infant-related factors, and the NICU and home environment. The hospital staff and environment were described by the parents as both supportive and barriers for their application of KMC. |
| Braga, Machado (RN, PhD), Bosi (Nutritionist, adj. professor), | To investigate perceptions and experiences of mothers of premature babies who breastfed exclusively from the 4th to the 6th month of life. | M: Individual open-ended interviews. | P: 8 mothers aged 17–38 y. | KMC is regarded as one of the factors that facilitate breastfeeding. |
| Byaruhanga (MD), Bergström (research assistant), Tibemanya (social scientist), Nakitto (midwife), Okong (MD, PhD), | To explore the perceptions of SSC among post-delivery mothers in order to identify factors that could influence the acceptability of this method. | M: Focus group discussions. | P: Sub-group of 30 mothers from another study, mean age 25 y, 18 multipara. | Acceptability of health practices influenced by knowledge and sensation. |
| Caetano (RN, asst. professor), Scochi (RN, assoc. professor), Angelo (RN, professor), | To understand family dynamics and transformation as a result of KMC. | T: Symbolic interactionism. | P: 18 mothers in a KMC unit, mean age 27.2 y. | The lived experience consists of one central category: Weighing the risks and benefits between staying with the child in the kangaroo method or with the family, involved three phenomena: 1) unexpected evolution and outcome in pregnancy, 2) coping with the prematurity of the child, 3) living with the decision and the experience together with the child. |
| Campos (RN, professor), Carvalho (RN), Rolim (RN, assoc. professor), Alencar (pediatrician, assist. professor), | To explore the mothers’ perceptions of KMC. | M: Descriptive study with qualitative approach. Semistructured interviews. | P: 13 mothers (19–39 y) in a KMC unit. | Strengthening of the bond between the mother and the newborn. |
| Dalbye (midwife), Calais (midwife), Berg (midwife, assoc. professor), | To explore experiences of SSC in healthy mothers of healthy, full-term infants in the first days after birth. | T: A lifeworld phenomenological approach. | P: 3 primiparous and 7 multiparous women, age 24–37 y. | The SSC started a positive spiral. A mutual interaction developed which acted as a generator releasing energy to the mother. Happiness, peace, and satisfaction were expressed by the newborns. |
| Duarte (RN), de Sena (RN, assoc. professor), | To capture the mothers’ understanding of KMC and reveal the contradictions between the reality and their perceptions of the availability required to provide this care. | M: descriptive exploratory qualitative study, guided by the dialectical method. | P: 15 mothers in a KMC unit. | KMC is an opportunity to recover the disbanded unit, favoring transition from a pregnant woman to a mother. |
| Eleutério (RN), Rolim (RN, professor), Campos (RN, professor), Frota (RN, assoc. professor), Oliveira (RN), | To explore the perceptions of mothers who experienced KMC during hospitalization in the KMC infirmary. | M: Semi-structured interviews. | P: 9 mothers in a KMC unit. | Four themes: 1) knowledge, 2) care, 3) receptivity, 4) caress. |
| Finigan (MSc, midwife), Davies (MPhil, midwife), | To explore women's lived experiences of SSC with their baby immediately after birth. | M: Audio diaries from birth up to 28th day postpartum. | P: 6 mothers (21–36 y), 5 multigravidas. | Five themes: 1) immediate feelings of bonding, 2) touch and stroking, 3) the gaze and getting to know the baby, 4) natural, instinctive behavior, 5) not wanting to let go of the baby. |
| Furlan (RN, MSc), Scochi (assoc. professor), Furtado (MSc), | To analyze preterm babies’ parents’ perceptions of KMC, in order to introduce subsidies for the promotion of humanized assistance to support NICU clients. | M: Qualitative descriptive. | P: 5 couples (5 mothers, 5 fathers) (18–33 y). | Four thematic nuclei: 1) The flexibility of the maternal stay in the KMC ward, 2) giving support to mother-child and family relationships, 3) completing the growth and development of the premature infant, and 4) developing skills to take care of the premature baby. |
| Heinemann (RN), Hellström-Westas (neonatologist, professor), Hedberg Nyqvist (RN, assoc. professor), | To describe parents’ experiences of factors that influenced their stay with their extremely preterm infants in an NICU. | M: Qualitative descriptive. | P: 7 couples (7 mothers, 6 fathers). | Two themes: 1) coping with a new and unexpected situation, and 2) ecoming a parent. |
| Helth (RN), Jarden (RN, PhD), | To explore how fathers of premature infants experience and potentially benefit from using skin-to-skin method during the NICU stay. | M: Hermeneutic phenomenological. | P: 5 first-time fathers (28–37 y). | Three themes: 1) the competent parenthood, 2) the paternal role and the division between the parents, 3) balance between working life and time spent with the infant. |
| Johnson (RN, assoc. professor), | To describe mothers’ experience of kangaroo holding of premature infants in the neonatal intensive unit as a means of gaining insight into specific maternal benefits of this intervention. | T: No explicit theoretical orientation. In the Discussion section, maternal role, development, and attachment are elaborated on. | P: 18 primiparous mothers, mean age 26.3 y. | Three themes: 1) maternal–infant benefits of kangaroo holding, 2) need of support for holding, and 3) satisfaction with interaction. |
| Lamy (neonatologist, professor), Morsch (psychologist), Deslandes (sociologist, assoc. professor), Fernandes (neonatologist), Moreira (neonatologist), Gomes (MD, assoc. professor), | To reveal how women construct their maternal role when they have had a preterm and/or low birth weight infant in an NICU. | M: Semi-structured interviews. | P: 20 mothers from 4 hospitals, having their infant for 1–3 m in the NICU. | KMC helped the women to feel like and consider themselves mothers. |
| Leonard (RN, MScN), Mayers (MScMed), | To explore the lived experiences of parents who provided their preterm infant with KMC. | M: A qualitative, explorative and contextual study in the phenomenological tradition. | P: 4 mothers, 2 fathers. | Six themes: 1) unforeseen, unprepared and uncertain—the experience of birth, 2) anxiety and barriers, 3) an intimate connection, 4) adjustments, roles and responsibilities, 5) measuring success, and 6) a network of encouragement and support. |
| Martins (RN), Santos (assoc. professor), | To identify the mothers’ difficulties participating in KMC and observe the strategies they used to overcome the difficulties. | M: Qualitative descriptive design. | P: 5 mothers (17–34 y) participating in KMC in an Intermediate Care Unit. | The thematic analysis resulted in two categories: 1) learning how to be a kangaroo mother, 2) living as a kangaroo mother. |
| Moura (professor of psychology), Araújo (PhD, psychologist), | To understand KMC users’ perceptions of the concept of motherhood and their motherhood experience. | M: semi-structured interviews and observations. French Discourse Analysis based on Foucault and Guattari's notion of subjectivity. | P: 8 low-income mothers in hospital KMC unit. | 1) family and religion were characterized as central elements in attribution of meaning to motherhood, 2) the impact of premature birth, leading to disruption in the construction of the maternal role, 3) relationships with institutions and health professionals characterized by distrust and resistance, and 4) experience of KMC, which provided an opportunity to establish contact with the child and gain confidence in one's own mothering role. |
| Nakajima (RN, PhD), | To study the effect of kangaroo care on maternal attachment and healing. | M: Comparison analysis. | P: 20 mothers who experienced KMC on more than three occasions. | Three themes: 1) feelings of guilt and uncertainly were alleviated, 2) mothers felt released from the constant feeling of hurt or pain, and 3) obtained a greater sense of “this is my child.” |
| Neu (RN, PhD), | To explore parents’ perceptions of providing SSC to their preterm infant who was receiving assisted ventilation and elucidate factors that influenced the decision to continue or discontinue SSC. | M: Naturalistic inquiry. | P: Sub-group of 8 mothers and 1 father from another project, mean age 25.9 y (21–37). 4 primiparous. | Three themes: 1) ambivalence of parents toward SSC, 2) need of a supportive environment, and 3) special quality of the parent–infant interaction. |
| Neu (RN, asst. professor), | To describe factors that influenced mothers of healthy preterm infants to choose kangaroo holding rather than the standard blanket holding method. | M: Naturalistic inquiry. | P: 24 primiparous mothers, median age 30 y (18–41). | Three themes: 1) expression of emotional distress, 2) perception of a facilitative environment for holding, 3) perceived benefits of close contact with the infant. |
| Neves (RN), Ravelli (MSN), Lemos (master degree), | To identify mothers’ perceptions of KMC. | M: Semi-structured interviews. | P: 6 mothers in a KMC unit. | KMC made the mothers more familiar with their infant. |
| Roller (midwife, asst. professor), | To gain an understanding of mothers’ experiences of providing KMC for their preterm newborns. | T: Maternal–infant attachment theory. | P: 10 mothers. | Four main themes, which were reduced to one essential structure of knowing: mothers were prevented from knowing or getting to know their preterm newborn. Only one theme concerned the aim of our study; Kangaroo Care and also some parts of the theme Reassurance. |
| Toma (pediatrician), | To increase understanding of the influence of hospital conditions and family organization on KMC practice. | M: Qualitative descriptive design. | P: 14 young mothers (10 first time) and 7 fathers. | The opportunity for effective parent participation from the beginning of life supports the creation and strengthening of the relationship and makes taking care of the child easier. However, the success of KMC does not only depend on the mothers’ will but also on the support of family networks and of a comprehensive health care staff. |
| Toma (pediatrician), Venancio (MD, PhD), Andretto (psychologist), | To improve KMC by contributing to the knowledge of the different ways in which low-income families deal with a preterm baby. | M: Grounded theory. | P: 22 mothers, mean 26 y. (part of a larger sample containing an additional 19 mothers pre-intervention). | The need to care for their other children appeared to be one of the main KMC constraints. The trend toward nuclear families hindered women's participation in the program. Awareness of the limitations and possibilities of each family may contribute to improved implementation. |
KMC=kangaroo mother care; SSC=skin-to-skin care; BW=birth weight; GA=gestational age; y=year; w=week; m=month; d=day; h=hour; min=minute; g=gram; RN=registered nurse; MS=master of science; MD=doctor of medicine; NICU=Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Figure 1A model of “Becoming a parent under unfamiliar circumstances.”
Overview of the identified themes, sub-themes, and categories.
| A restorative experience | An energy-draining experience | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Feeling good | Doing good | Becom-ing us | Feeling exposed | Hurting others | |||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| A heart-warming experience | Relieving emotional suffering | A rewarding experience | A natural instinct | A learning experience | Finding a role | Improved self-esteem | Feeling of control | A supportive environment | A way of knowing and understanding | Important for the infant | A bonding experience | Intimate togetherness | Environment as an obstacle | The physical and emotional burden | Incongruence between wishes and demands | Uncertainty about the purpose of and own skill in providing SSC | Fear of hurting | Feeling insufficient toward the family | |
| Affonso et al. | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
| Affonso et al. | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||
| Arivabene & Tyrell | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
| Blomqvist & Nyqvist | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
| Blomqvist et al. | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Blomqvist et al. | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Braga et al. | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Byaruhanga et al. | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
| Caetano et al. | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Campos et al. | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
| Dalbye et al. | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
| Duarte & de Sena | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
| Eleutério et al. | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
| Finigan & Davies | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||
| Furlan et al. | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Heinemann et al. | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
| Helth & Jarden | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
| Johnson | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
| Lamy et al. | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
| Leonard & Mayers | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Martins & dos Santos | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||
| Moura & Araújo | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||
| Nakajima | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
| Neu | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
| Neu | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
| Neves et al. | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||
| Roller | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
| Toma | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
| Toma et al. | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||