Literature DB >> 253196

Measuring the quality of medical care: process versus outcome.

W E McAuliffe.   

Abstract

The controversy over appropriate and efficient ways to measure the quality of medical care continues. Many experts call for increased attention to assessment of the outcome of care. Others maintain that process measurements are more direct and practical. But both measurement techniques are of questionable validity, and each obscures important problems of the differences among patients, disease severity, and medical performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 253196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc        ISSN: 0160-1997


  9 in total

Review 1.  Recertification in the United States.

Authors:  J J Norcini
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-30

2.  Instrumental variable methods to assess quality of care the marginal effects of process-of-care on blood pressure change and treatment costs.

Authors:  Puttarin Kulchaitanaroaj; Barry L Carter; Amber M Goedken; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; John M Brooks
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2014-08-01

3.  Are Washington Circle performance measures associated with decreased criminal activity following treatment?

Authors:  Deborah W Garnick; Constance M Horgan; Margaret T Lee; Lee Panas; Grant A Ritter; Steve Davis; Tracy Leeper; Rebecca Moore; Mark Reynolds
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2007-05-23

4.  Supervision of mental health care in The Netherlands.

Authors:  O H Brook
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci       Date:  1987

5.  Non-medical treatments and their outcomes. Part two: Focus on adherents of spiritualism.

Authors:  K Finkler
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  1981-03

6.  Comparing hospitals that perform coronary artery bypass surgery: the effect of outcome measures and data sources.

Authors:  A J Hartz; E M Kuhn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Evaluation of primary care in a community clinic by means of explicit process criteria.

Authors:  S Sheps; A Robertson
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Outcome evaluations in the mental health field.

Authors:  H C Schulberg
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1981

9.  Performance measures for mental health programs: something better, something worse, or more of the same?

Authors:  H Keppler-Seid; C Windle; J R Woy
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1980
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.