Literature DB >> 25319550

ASTM F1717 standard for the preclinical evaluation of posterior spinal fixators: can we improve it?

Luigi La Barbera1, Fabio Galbusera2, Tomaso Villa3, Francesco Costa4, Hans-Joachim Wilke5.   

Abstract

Preclinical evaluation of spinal implants is a necessary step to ensure their reliability and safety before implantation. The American Society for Testing and Materials reapproved F1717 standard for the assessment of mechanical properties of posterior spinal fixators, which simulates a vertebrectomy model and recommends mimicking vertebral bodies using polyethylene blocks. This set-up should represent the clinical use, but available data in the literature are few. Anatomical parameters depending on the spinal level were compared to published data or measurements on biplanar stereoradiography on 13 patients. Other mechanical variables, describing implant design were considered, and all parameters were investigated using a numerical parametric finite element model. Stress values were calculated by considering either the combination of the average values for each parameter or their worst-case combination depending on the spinal level. The standard set-up represents quite well the anatomy of an instrumented average thoracolumbar segment. The stress on the pedicular screw is significantly influenced by the lever arm of the applied load, the unsupported screw length, the position of the centre of rotation of the functional spine unit and the pedicular inclination with respect to the sagittal plane. The worst-case combination of parameters demonstrates that devices implanted below T5 could potentially undergo higher stresses than those described in the standard suggestions (maximum increase of 22.2% at L1). We propose to revise F1717 in order to describe the anatomical worst case condition we found at L1 level: this will guarantee higher safety of the implant for a wider population of patients. © IMechE 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASTM F1717; ISO 12189; fatigue testing; finite element model; parametric study; pedicle anatomy; pedicle screw; pedicular inclination; standard

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25319550     DOI: 10.1177/0954411914554244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  5 in total

1.  Material failure in dynamic spine implants: are the standardized implant tests before market launch sufficient?

Authors:  Stavros Oikonomidis; Rolf Sobottke; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Christian Herren; Agnes Beckmann; Kourosh Zarghooni; Jan Siewe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Preclinical evaluation of posterior spine stabilization devices: can the current standards represent basic everyday life activities?

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Preclinical evaluation of posterior spine stabilization devices: can we compare in vitro and in vivo loads on the instrumentation?

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Clinically relevant finite element technique based protocol to evaluate growing rods for early onset scoliosis correction.

Authors:  Niloufar Shekouhi; David Dick; Maxwell William Baechle; Dilpreet Kaur Kaeley; Vijay K Goel; Hassan Serhan; Jeremy Rawlinson; Derek Shaw
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2020-08-21

5.  Incomplete insertion of pedicle screws in a standard construct reduces the fatigue life: A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Yo-Lun Chu; Chia-Hsien Chen; Fon-Yih Tsuang; Chang-Jung Chiang; Yueh Wu; Yi-Jie Kuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.