Literature DB >> 25319365

Antibacterial dental composites with chlorhexidine and mesoporous silica.

J F Zhang1, R Wu1, Y Fan1, S Liao1, Y Wang1, Z T Wen1, X Xu2.   

Abstract

One of the leading causes for the failure of dental composite restorations is secondary caries. Effectively inhibiting cariogenic biofilms and reducing secondary caries could extend the service life of composite restorations. Dental composites releasing antibacterial agents such as chlorhexidine (CHX) have shown biofilm-inhibitory efficacy, but they usually have poor physical and mechanical properties. Herein, we present a study of a new method to encapsulate and release CHX from dental composite using mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs). SBA-15 MSNs were synthesized according to a reported procedure. CHX (62.9 wt%) was encapsulated into dried MSN from 0.3 M CHX ethanol solution. The dental composites containing 0% (control), 3%, 5%, and 6.3% CHX or the same amounts of CHX entrapped in MSN (denoted as CHX@MSN) were fabricated with methacrylate monomers and silanized glass fillers (CHX or CHX@MSN + glass filler particle = 70 wt%). The monomer mixture consisted of bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate (BisGMA), hexanediol dimethacrylate (HDDMA), ethoxylated bisphenol A dimethacrylate (EBPADMA), and urethane dimethacrylates (UEDMA) at a weight ratio of 40:30:20:10. The composites were tested for CHX release and recharge, flexural strength and modulus (at 24 hr and 1 mo), surface roughness, in vitro wear, and antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus casei (in both planktonic growth and biofilm formation). The results showed that the composites with CHX@MSN largely retained mechanical properties and smooth surfaces and showed controlled release of CHX over a long time. In contrast, the composites with directly mixed CHX showed reduced mechanical properties, rough surfaces, and burst release of CHX in a short time. The composites with CHX either directly mixed or in MSN showed strong inhibition to S. mutans and L. casei. This research has demonstrated the successful application of MSNs as a novel nanotechnology in dental materials to inhibit oral biofilm without sacrificing materials' mechanical properties and surface integrity. © International & American Associations for Dental Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Streptococcus mutans; bacteria; biofilm; controlled release; mechanical properties; surface roughness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25319365      PMCID: PMC4237641          DOI: 10.1177/0022034514555143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  27 in total

Review 1.  Quality of dental restorations. FDI Commission Project 2-95.

Authors:  A Jokstad; S Bayne; U Blunck; M Tyas; N Wilson
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 2.  An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations.

Authors:  V Deligeorgi; I A Mjör; N H Wilson
Journal:  Prim Dent Care       Date:  2001-01

3.  Chlorhexidine release from room temperature polymerising methacrylate systems.

Authors:  P D Riggs; M Braden; M Patel
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Antibacterial and physical properties of calcium-phosphate and calcium-fluoride nanocomposites with chlorhexidine.

Authors:  Lei Cheng; Michael D Weir; Hockin H K Xu; Alison M Kraigsley; Nancy J Lin; Sheng Lin-Gibson; Xuedong Zhou
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Triclosan-loaded tooth-binding micelles for prevention and treatment of dental biofilm.

Authors:  Fu Chen; Kelly C Rice; Xin-Ming Liu; Richard A Reinhardt; Kenneth W Bayles; Dong Wang
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Chlorhexidine-releasing methacrylate dental composite materials.

Authors:  Danny Leung; David A Spratt; Jonathan Pratten; Kishor Gulabivala; Nicola J Mordan; Anne M Young
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Semiporous reinforcing fillers for composite resins: I. Preparation of provisional glass formulations.

Authors:  R L Bowen; L E Reed
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1976 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Triblock copolymer syntheses of mesoporous silica with periodic 50 to 300 angstrom pores

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Effect of filler porosity on the abrasion resistance of nanoporous silica gel/polymer composites.

Authors:  J Luo; J J Lannutti; R R Seghi
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  LuxS-mediated signaling in Streptococcus mutans is involved in regulation of acid and oxidative stress tolerance and biofilm formation.

Authors:  Zezhang T Wen; Robert A Burne
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Developing a New Generation of Antimicrobial and Bioactive Dental Resins.

Authors:  L Cheng; K Zhang; N Zhang; M A S Melo; M D Weir; X D Zhou; Y X Bai; M A Reynolds; H H K Xu
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Interaction between the Oral Microbiome and Dental Composite Biomaterials: Where We Are and Where We Should Go.

Authors:  J Kreth; J Merritt; C S Pfeifer; S Khajotia; J L Ferracane
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Antimicrobial antidegradative dental adhesive preserves restoration-tooth bond.

Authors:  Cameron A Stewart; Jenny H Hong; Benjamin D Hatton; Yoav Finer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  A new arginine-based dental adhesive system: formulation, mechanical and anti-caries properties.

Authors:  Saulo Geraldeli; Eveline F Soares; Andres J Alvarez; Tanaz Farivar; Robert C Shields; Mario A C Sinhoreti; Marcelle M Nascimento
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Should local drug delivery systems be used in dentistry?

Authors:  Joana Vieira Costa; Jaime Portugal; Cristina Bettencourt Neves; Ana F Bettencourt
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 4.617

6.  Modification of glass-ionomer cement properties by quaternized chitosan-coated nanoparticles.

Authors:  Enas A Elshenawy; Manal Ahmed El-Ebiary; El-Refaie Kenawy; Gehan Abdelmonem El-Olimy
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.885

Review 7.  Biostable, antidegradative and antimicrobial restorative systems based on host-biomaterials and microbial interactions.

Authors:  Cameron A Stewart; Yoav Finer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Antimicrobial potential of resin matrices loaded with coffee compounds.

Authors:  Sarah A de Almeida; Jack L Ferracane; Eduardo M da Silva; Amanda M Mushashe; Justin Merritt; Anderson A Rocha; Jaime D Noronha-Filho; Rayane V de Almeida; Laiza T Poskus
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 9.  Recent Progress in Antimicrobial Strategies for Resin-Based Restoratives.

Authors:  Qiannan Sun; Lingyun Zhang; Rushui Bai; Zimeng Zhuang; Yunfan Zhang; Tingting Yu; Liying Peng; Tianyi Xin; Si Chen; Bing Han
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.329

10.  Novel Bioactive Glass-Modified Hybrid Composite Resin: Mechanical Properties, Biocompatibility, and Antibacterial and Remineralizing Activity.

Authors:  Xiao Han; Yan Chen; Qian Jiang; Xin Liu; Yaming Chen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.