| Literature DB >> 25317598 |
Tao Hu1, Arqum Hashmi1, Jisang Hong1.
Abstract
Multifunctional material brings many interesting issues because of various potential device applications. Using first principles calculations, we predict that the graphitic carbon nitride (Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25317598 PMCID: PMC5377544 DOI: 10.1038/srep06059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic illustration of two dimensional g-C4N3 layer.
Here, and are lattice vectors.
Figure 2Top and side views of optimized structure CNNTs: (a)–(d) for armchairs of (n, n) with n = 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively and (e)–(h) for zigzag tubes of (n, 0) with n = 4, 5, 6 and 7, respectively.
Other tubes considered in our work have similar structure. The only difference is the number of subcells and the diameter.
Calculated total energy differences (in meV) of CNNTs
| Index | (2, 2) | (3, 3) | (4, 4) | (5, 5) | (6, 6) | (4, 0) | (5, 0) | (6, 0) | (7, 0) | (8, 0) | (10, 0) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 250 | 370 | 460 | 601 | 807 | −180 | 665 | −540 | 838 | 202 | 251 | |
| 360 | 380 | 490 | 617 | 726 | 810 | 786 | 980 | 834 | 929 | 984 |
Calculated spin magnetic moment (in μB) inside Wigner-Seitz radius
| Index | (2, 2) | (3, 3) | (4, 4) | (5, 5) | (6, 6) | (4, 0) | (5, 0) | (6, 0) | (7, 0) | (8, 0) | (10, 0) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.24 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | ±0.05 | 0.05 | ±0.05 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.02 | |
| 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.25 | ±0.10 | 0.29 | ±0.10 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.26 | |
| 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.26 | ±0.18 | 0.23 | ±0.20 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.25 | |
| 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.26 | ±0.27 | 0.23 | ±0.23 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.26 |
Figure 3Calculated energy band structures: (a)–(d) are for (2, 2), (3, 3), (4, 4) and (6, 6) armchair tubes, respectively and (e)–(h) are for (4, 0), (5, 0), (7, 0) and (8, 0) zigzag tubes, respectively.
The red lines represent majority spin bands and the blacks lines are for minority spin bands. The Fermi level is indicated in blue dashed line.
Figure 4Calculated total DOS: (a)–(d) are for (2, 2), (3, 3), (4, 4) and (6, 6) armchair tubes, respectively and (e)–(h) are for (4, 0), (5, 0), (7, 0) and (8, 0) zigzag tubes, respectively.
Figure 5Snapshots (Top and side view) at the end of 10 ps ab initio molecular dynamics simulation for tube (4, 4) at 300 K (a) and 500 K (b).
Figure 6Frequency dependent imaginary part of dielectric functions: (a) Perpendicular polarization to tube axis (b) Parallel polarization to tube axis.
Figure 7Calculated absorption coefficients: (a) Perpendicular polarization to tube axis (b) Parallel polarization to tube axis.