Literature DB >> 25317597

Development of a novel, multilayered presentation format for clinical practice guidelines.

Annette Kristiansen1, Linn Brandt1, Pablo Alonso-Coello2, Thomas Agoritsas3, Elie A Akl4, Tara Conboy5, Mahmoud Elbarbary5, Mazen Ferwana5, Wedad Medani5, Mohammad Hassan Murad6, David Rigau7, Sarah Rosenbaum8, Frederick A Spencer9, Shaun Treweek10, Gordon Guyatt3, Per Olav Vandvik11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bridging the gap between clinical research and everyday health-care practice requires effective communication strategies. To address current shortcomings in conveying practice recommendations and supporting evidence, we are creating and testing presentation formats for clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).
METHODS: We carried out multiple cycles of brainstorming and sketching, developing a prototype. Physicians participating in the user testing viewed CPG formats linked to clinical scenarios and engaged in semistructured interviews applying a think-aloud method for exploring important aspects of user experience.
RESULTS: We developed a multilayered presentation format that allows clinicians to successively view more in-depth information. Starting with the recommendations, clinicians can, on demand, access a rationale and a key information section containing statements on quality of the evidence, balance between desirable and undesirable consequences, values and preferences, and resource considerations. We collected feedback from 27 stakeholders and performed user testing with 47 practicing physicians from six countries. Advisory group feedback and user testing of the first version revealed problems with conceptual understanding of underlying CPG methodology, as well as difficulties with the complexity of the layout and content. Extensive revisions made before the second round of user testing resulted in most participants expressing overall satisfaction with the final presentation format.
CONCLUSIONS: We have developed an electronic, multilayered, CPG format that enhances the usability of CPGs for frontline clinicians. We have implemented the format in electronic guideline tools that guideline organizations can now use when authoring and publishing their guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25317597     DOI: 10.1378/chest.14-1366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  13 in total

1.  Decision aids linked to the recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: results of the acceptability of a decision aid for patients with generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Vanesa Ramos-García; Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez; Amado Rivero-Santana; Wenceslao Peñate-Castro; Andrea Duarte-Díaz; Yolanda Álvarez-Pérez; María Del Mar Trujillo-Martín; María Isabel Del Cura-González; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.298

2.  Living cumulative network meta-analysis to reduce waste in research: A paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews?

Authors:  Per Olav Vandvik; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens.

Authors:  Thomas Agoritsas; Anja Fog Heen; Linn Brandt; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Annette Kristiansen; Elie A Akl; Ignacio Neumann; Kari Ao Tikkinen; Trudy van der Weijden; Glyn Elwyn; Victor M Montori; Gordon H Guyatt; Per Olav Vandvik
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-02-10

4.  Improving the user experience of patient versions of clinical guidelines: user testing of a Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) patient version.

Authors:  Naomi Fearns; Karen Graham; Gordon Johnston; Duncan Service
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  Reviewing clinical guideline development tools: features and characteristics.

Authors:  Soudabeh Khodambashi; Øystein Nytrø
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Multilayered and digitally structured presentation formats of trustworthy recommendations: a combined survey and randomised trial.

Authors:  Linn Brandt; Per Olav Vandvik; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Elie A Akl; Judith Thornton; David Rigau; Katie Adams; Paul O'Connor; Gordon Guyatt; Annette Kristiansen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Developing Evidence to Decision Frameworks and an Interactive Evidence to Decision Tool for Making and Using Decisions and Recommendations in Health Care.

Authors:  Sarah E Rosenbaum; Jenny Moberg; Claire Glenton; Holger J Schünemann; Simon Lewin; Elie Akl; Reem A Mustafa; Angela Morelli; Joshua P Vogel; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Gabriel Rada; Juan Vásquez; Elena Parmelli; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Signe A Flottorp; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Glob Chall       Date:  2018-01-10

8.  What do patients and the public know about clinical practice guidelines and what do they want from them? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Naomi Fearns; Joanna Kelly; Margaret Callaghan; Karen Graham; Kirsty Loudon; Robin Harbour; Nancy Santesso; Emma McFarlane; Judith Thornton; Shaun Treweek
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  UpToDate adherence to GRADE criteria for strong recommendations: an analytical survey.

Authors:  Thomas Agoritsas; Arnaud Merglen; Anja Fog Heen; Annette Kristiansen; Ignacio Neumann; Juan P Brito; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Paul E Alexander; David M Rind; Per O Vandvik; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Decision aids linked to evidence summaries and clinical practice guidelines: results from user-testing in clinical encounters.

Authors:  Anja Fog Heen; Per Olav Vandvik; Linn Brandt; Frankie Achille; Gordon Henry Guyatt; Elie A Akl; Shaun Treewek; Thomas Agoritsas
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.