Annette Kristiansen1, Linn Brandt1, Pablo Alonso-Coello2, Thomas Agoritsas3, Elie A Akl4, Tara Conboy5, Mahmoud Elbarbary5, Mazen Ferwana5, Wedad Medani5, Mohammad Hassan Murad6, David Rigau7, Sarah Rosenbaum8, Frederick A Spencer9, Shaun Treweek10, Gordon Guyatt3, Per Olav Vandvik11. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Institute for Health and Society, Department of Internal Medicine, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 2. Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Institute of Biomedical Research, Sant Pau, Spain. Electronic address: rachael.evans@uhl-tr.nhs.uk. 3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. 5. National & Gulf Center for Evidence Based Health Practice, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 6. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 7. Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Institute of Biomedical Research, Sant Pau, Spain. 8. The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway. 9. Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 10. Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland. 11. Department of Internal Medicine, Institute for Health and Society, The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bridging the gap between clinical research and everyday health-care practice requires effective communication strategies. To address current shortcomings in conveying practice recommendations and supporting evidence, we are creating and testing presentation formats for clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). METHODS: We carried out multiple cycles of brainstorming and sketching, developing a prototype. Physicians participating in the user testing viewed CPG formats linked to clinical scenarios and engaged in semistructured interviews applying a think-aloud method for exploring important aspects of user experience. RESULTS: We developed a multilayered presentation format that allows clinicians to successively view more in-depth information. Starting with the recommendations, clinicians can, on demand, access a rationale and a key information section containing statements on quality of the evidence, balance between desirable and undesirable consequences, values and preferences, and resource considerations. We collected feedback from 27 stakeholders and performed user testing with 47 practicing physicians from six countries. Advisory group feedback and user testing of the first version revealed problems with conceptual understanding of underlying CPG methodology, as well as difficulties with the complexity of the layout and content. Extensive revisions made before the second round of user testing resulted in most participants expressing overall satisfaction with the final presentation format. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed an electronic, multilayered, CPG format that enhances the usability of CPGs for frontline clinicians. We have implemented the format in electronic guideline tools that guideline organizations can now use when authoring and publishing their guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Bridging the gap between clinical research and everyday health-care practice requires effective communication strategies. To address current shortcomings in conveying practice recommendations and supporting evidence, we are creating and testing presentation formats for clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). METHODS: We carried out multiple cycles of brainstorming and sketching, developing a prototype. Physicians participating in the user testing viewed CPG formats linked to clinical scenarios and engaged in semistructured interviews applying a think-aloud method for exploring important aspects of user experience. RESULTS: We developed a multilayered presentation format that allows clinicians to successively view more in-depth information. Starting with the recommendations, clinicians can, on demand, access a rationale and a key information section containing statements on quality of the evidence, balance between desirable and undesirable consequences, values and preferences, and resource considerations. We collected feedback from 27 stakeholders and performed user testing with 47 practicing physicians from six countries. Advisory group feedback and user testing of the first version revealed problems with conceptual understanding of underlying CPG methodology, as well as difficulties with the complexity of the layout and content. Extensive revisions made before the second round of user testing resulted in most participants expressing overall satisfaction with the final presentation format. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed an electronic, multilayered, CPG format that enhances the usability of CPGs for frontline clinicians. We have implemented the format in electronic guideline tools that guideline organizations can now use when authoring and publishing their guidelines.
Authors: Vanesa Ramos-García; Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez; Amado Rivero-Santana; Wenceslao Peñate-Castro; Andrea Duarte-Díaz; Yolanda Álvarez-Pérez; María Del Mar Trujillo-Martín; María Isabel Del Cura-González; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 3.298
Authors: Thomas Agoritsas; Anja Fog Heen; Linn Brandt; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Annette Kristiansen; Elie A Akl; Ignacio Neumann; Kari Ao Tikkinen; Trudy van der Weijden; Glyn Elwyn; Victor M Montori; Gordon H Guyatt; Per Olav Vandvik Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-02-10
Authors: Linn Brandt; Per Olav Vandvik; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Elie A Akl; Judith Thornton; David Rigau; Katie Adams; Paul O'Connor; Gordon Guyatt; Annette Kristiansen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Sarah E Rosenbaum; Jenny Moberg; Claire Glenton; Holger J Schünemann; Simon Lewin; Elie Akl; Reem A Mustafa; Angela Morelli; Joshua P Vogel; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Gabriel Rada; Juan Vásquez; Elena Parmelli; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Signe A Flottorp; Andrew D Oxman Journal: Glob Chall Date: 2018-01-10
Authors: Thomas Agoritsas; Arnaud Merglen; Anja Fog Heen; Annette Kristiansen; Ignacio Neumann; Juan P Brito; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Paul E Alexander; David M Rind; Per O Vandvik; Gordon H Guyatt Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Anja Fog Heen; Per Olav Vandvik; Linn Brandt; Frankie Achille; Gordon Henry Guyatt; Elie A Akl; Shaun Treewek; Thomas Agoritsas Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 2.796