Literature DB >> 25317378

Quality measurement: It's here to stay.

Eric M Cheng1, Amy E Sanders1, Adam B Cohen1, Christopher T Bever1.   

Abstract

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is shifting from volume-based to value-based reimbursement of health care services. Measuring the value of health care requires measurement of quality and cost. We provide an overview of quality measurement and review a well-known and widely used conceptual model for assessing quality: structure, process, and outcome. We highlight the advantages and disadvantages of using these types of metrics. We then use this conceptual model to describe prominent CMS programs such as the Physician Quality Reporting System, Physician Compare Web site, and the Medicare Shared Savings Plan. We highlight 2 recent trends: the increasing use of outcome measures to supplement process measures and the public reporting of quality.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25317378      PMCID: PMC4196461          DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract        ISSN: 2163-0402


  14 in total

Review 1.  How to measure comorbidity. a critical review of available methods.

Authors:  Vincent de Groot; Heleen Beckerman; Gustaaf J Lankhorst; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Connections between quality measurement and improvement.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick; Brent James; Molly Joel Coye
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Variability in the measurement of hospital-wide mortality rates.

Authors:  David M Shahian; Robert E Wolf; Lisa I Iezzoni; Leslie Kirle; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Mortality as a measure of quality: implications for palliative and end-of-life care.

Authors:  Robert G Holloway; Timothy E Quill
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Quality measures for neurologists: Financial and practice implications.

Authors:  Adam B Cohen; Amy E Sanders; Rebecca J Swain-Eng; Gina Gjorvad; Sarah T Tonn; Christopher T Bever; Eric M Cheng
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2013-02

7.  Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections.

Authors:  Jonah J Stulberg; Conor P Delaney; Duncan V Neuhauser; David C Aron; Pingfu Fu; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Quality improvement in neurology: AAN Parkinson disease quality measures: report of the Quality Measurement and Reporting Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Authors:  E M Cheng; S Tonn; R Swain-Eng; S A Factor; W J Weiner; C T Bever
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 9.  Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

10.  Reduced mortality with hospital pay for performance in England.

Authors:  Matt Sutton; Silviya Nikolova; Ruth Boaden; Helen Lester; Ruth McDonald; Martin Roland
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Silent majority.

Authors:  E Ray Dorsey
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2016-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.