| Literature DB >> 25317070 |
Han Yuen Lam1, Khatijah Yusoff1, Swee Keong Yeap2, Tamilselvan Subramani1, Suraini Abd-Aziz1, Abdul Rahman Omar2, Noorjahan Banu Alitheen1.
Abstract
Immunotherapy has raised the attention of many scientists because it hold promise to be an attractive therapeutic strategy to treat a number of disorders. In this study, the immunomodulatory effects of low titers of Newcastle disease virus (NDV) AF2240 on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were analyzed. We evaluated cytokine secretion and PBMC activation by cell proliferation assay, immunophenotyping and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. The proliferation of the human PBMC was measured to be 28.5% and 36.5% upon treatment with 8 hemaglutinin unit (HAU) and 2 HAU of NDV respectively. Interestingly, the percentage of cells with activating markers CD16 and CD56 were increased significantly. Furthermore, the intracellular perforin and granzyme levels were also increased upon virus infection. Human PBMC treated with NDV titer 8 HAU was found to stimulate the highest level of cytokine production including interferon-γ, interleukin-2 and interleukin-12. The release of these proteins contributes to the antitumor effect of PBMC against MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Based on the 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay, activated human PBMC showed high cytolytic efficiency towards human breast tumor cells. In summary, NDV was able to stimulate PBMC proliferation, cytokine secretion and cytolytic activity.Entities:
Keywords: AF2240; Newcastle disease virus; PBMC; breast cancer; immunomodulation; immunophenotyping
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25317070 PMCID: PMC4196125 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.8170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Figure 1BrdU cell proliferation study of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) after exposed to NDV for 72 hours.The values were the means ± SE of three independent experiment. The differences between the control group and treated group were determined by one-way ANOVA. (* p < 0.05).
FACS immunophenotyping analysis of activated human PBMC by NDV for 72 hours by staining with anti-human CD56 and CD16 monoclonal antibody. The values were the means ± SE of three independent experiments. The data were analyzed for significance by SPSS (p < 0.05).
| Virus titer | CD56- | CD56+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD16- | CD16+ | CD16- | CD16+ | |
| Others | Macrophages | Cytokine secreting NK cells | Cytolytic NK cells | |
| 8 HAU | 79.920±0.817 * | 1.690±0.199 * | 9.220±0.450 * | 9.163±0.340 * |
| 2 HAU | 84.830±0.766 * | 1.007±0.253 | 8.373±0.215 * | 5.790±0.362 * |
| Untreated PBMC | 92.050±0.242 | 0.363±0.055 | 3.277±0.093 | 4.310±0.144 |
Figure 2ELISA results for cytokine (IFN-γ) detection after human PBMC treated with virus 8 HAU, 2 HAU and control. The values were the means ± SE of three independent experiment. The differences between the control group and treated group were determined by one-way ANOVA. (* p < 0.05).
Figure 3ELISA result showed the level of interleukin-2 (IL-2) released from the human PBMC after treated by NDV at different titers. The values were the means ± SE of three independent experiment. The differences between the control group and treated group were determined by one-way ANOVA. (* p < 0.05).
Figure 4ELISA result showed the level of interleukin-12 released from the human PBMC after treated by NDV at different titers.The values were the means ± SE of three independent experiment. The differences between the control group and treated group were determined by one-way ANOVA. (* p < 0.05).
FACS immunophenotyping analysis of activated human PBMC by NDV for 72 hours by staining with Anti-human CD56 and perforin antibody. The values were the means ± SE of three independent experiment. The data were analyzed for significance by SPSS (p < 0.05).
| Virus titer | CD56- | CD56+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perforin- | Perforin+ | Perforin- | Perforin+ | |
| Others | T lymphocytes | Non-activated NK cells | NK cells | |
| 8 HAU | 70.99±0.726 * | 5.80±0.683 * | 12.64±0.612 * | 10.57±0.392 * |
| 2 HAU | 71.63±0.647 * | 2.23±0.560 | 16.71±0.429 * | 9.43±0.027 * |
| Untreated PBMC | 85.59±0.225 | 2.56±0.388 | 7.57±0.215 | 4.28±0.143 |
FACS immunophenotyping analysis of activated human PBMC by NDV for 72 hours by staining with Anti-human CD56 and granzyme B antibody. The values were the means ± SE of three independent experiment. The data were analyzed for significance by the statistic software SPSS (p < 0.05).
| Virus titer | CD56- | CD56+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granzyme B- | Granzyme B+ | Granzyme B- | Granzyme B+ | |
| Others | Cytolytic T lymphocytes | Non-activated NK cells | NK cells | |
| 8 HAU | 71.90±0.735 * | 3.72±0.438* | 13.85±0.670 * | 10.53±0.391 * |
| 2 HAU | 72.88±0.658 * | 3.52±0.884* | 14.49±0.372 * | 9.11±0.026 * |
| Untreated PBMC | 84.00±0.221 | 2.69±0.408 | 9.72±0.276 | 3.59±0.120 |
Figure 5The cell viability of MCF-7 cells (target) after being co-cultured with activated PBMC (effector) at different E/T ratios. The values were the means ± SE of three independent experiment. The differences between the control group and treated group were determined by one-way ANOVA.
FACS Annexin-V-FITC/PI apoptosis analysis of MCF-7 cell (Target) after 24 hours co-cultivated with untreated and NDV activated human PBMC (Effector) at 5 to 1 E/T ratios. The values were the means ± SE of three independent experiment. The data were analyzed for significance by the statistic software SPSS (p < 0.05).
| Virus titer treatment on PBMC co-cultured with MCF-7 | Population of Viable MCF-7 (%) | Population of MCF-7 at early apoptosis (%) (AnnexinV+/PI-) | Population of MCF-7 at late apoptosis (%) (AnnexinV+/PI+) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 HAU | 57.72±2.38* | 9.49±2.87* | 32.79±3.33* |
| 2 HAU | 63.33±2.51* | 6.42±3.16 | 30.25±2.65* |
| Untreated PBMC | 71.34±3.34 | 5.10±2.77 | 23.56±1.87 |
Figure 6The granzyme B level in supernatant of MCF-7 cells (target) after being co-cultured for 24 hours with activated PBMC (effector) at 5 to 1 E/T ratios. The values were the means ± SE of three independent experiment. The differences between the control group and treated group were determined by one-way ANOVA. (* p < 0.05).