Yun Gong1, Lili Hao1, Xiyan Zhang1, Yan Zhou2, Jianqi Li3, Zhimin Zhao1, Wenqing Jiang2, Yasong DU1. 1. Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 2. Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 3. Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescent depression results in severe and protracted suffering for affected individuals and their family members, but the underlying mechanism of this disabling condition remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: Compare resting-state brain functioning between first-episode, drug-naïve adolescents with major depressive disorder and matched controls. METHODS: Fifteen adolescents with major depressive disorder and 16 controls underwent a resting-state fMRI scan performed using a 3T magnetic resonance scanner. The amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (ALFF) was used to assess resting-state brain function. RESULTS: Adolescents with depression had higher mean (sd) scores on the Children Depression Inventory (CDI) than controls (22.13 [9.21] vs. 9.37 [5.65]). Compared with controls, adolescents with depression had higher ALFF in the posterior cingulate gyrus, left inferior temporal gyrus, right superior temporal gyrus, right insula, right parietal lobe, and right fusiform gyrus; they also exhibited lower ALFF in the bilateral cuneus, the left occipital lobe, and the left medial frontal lobe. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent depression is associated with significant changes in the functioning of several regions of the brain.
BACKGROUND:Adolescent depression results in severe and protracted suffering for affected individuals and their family members, but the underlying mechanism of this disabling condition remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: Compare resting-state brain functioning between first-episode, drug-naïve adolescents with major depressive disorder and matched controls. METHODS: Fifteen adolescents with major depressive disorder and 16 controls underwent a resting-state fMRI scan performed using a 3T magnetic resonance scanner. The amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (ALFF) was used to assess resting-state brain function. RESULTS: Adolescents with depression had higher mean (sd) scores on the ChildrenDepression Inventory (CDI) than controls (22.13 [9.21] vs. 9.37 [5.65]). Compared with controls, adolescents with depression had higher ALFF in the posterior cingulate gyrus, left inferior temporal gyrus, right superior temporal gyrus, right insula, right parietal lobe, and right fusiform gyrus; they also exhibited lower ALFF in the bilateral cuneus, the left occipital lobe, and the left medial frontal lobe. CONCLUSIONS:Adolescent depression is associated with significant changes in the functioning of several regions of the brain.
Entities:
Keywords:
China; adolescents; case-control studies; magnetic resonance imaging; major depressive disorder
According to the World Health Organization, depression
will become the second largest cause of global
disease burden by 2020.[1] Three-quarters of adults
with depression have their initial episode during
childhood or adolescence.[2] Low mood, decreased
interests, and lack of happiness are the core symptoms
of adolescent depression. This disabling condition
has a high prevalence and frequently relapses after
treatment. Adolescent depression can lead to serious
consequences, such as poor academic performance
and increased risks of substance abuse and suicide.
According to the National Institute of Mental Health
(NIMH) of the United States, depression is the third
leading cause of death among adolescents.[3] Moreover,
longitudinal research has shown that individuals with a
history of depression in childhood or adolescence were
four times more likely to experience depression during
early adulthood than those who did not experience
depression during childhood or adolescence.[4] In
summary, adolescent depression results in severe
suffering for the affected individuals and a substantial health burden for family members and the society
at large. Despite the public health importance of
this condition, the etiology of adolescent depression
remains unclear.Resting-state magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
refers to MRI scanning without any stimulation. Binderd
and colleagues[5] found that the human brain has
organized activity even under the resting state. The
amplitude of low frequency fluctuations (ALFF) is one of
the most common methods for measuring changes in
blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signals within the
low frequency range (0.01-0.08 Hz) during the resting
state. Irregular patterns in ALFF can reveal abnormalities
in spontaneous brain activities. This method has
previously been used to assess brain activity in Attention
Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).[6]There are several reports of studies that used
resting-state MRI to assess brain activity – primarily
in the frontal lobe and limbic system – in adults with
depression. Most of these studies found abnormalities
in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), [7] medial
frontal gyrus, [8] anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), [9],[10] amygdala, medial thalamus, and striatum.[11],[12] These
areas are located in the frontal-limbic circuit, which
plays an important role in the etiology of depression.There are far fewer functional brain imaging studies
on adolescent depression than on adult depression. The
mechanisms of adolescent depression are unclear; given
that the brain regions which participate in emotional
regulation mature during adolescence, the brain regions
involved in adolescent depression may be different
from those identified for adult depression. The current
study hypothesizes that the occurrence of adolescent
depression is associated with abnormal activities in the
resting-state functioning of the brain networks related
to emotional regulation. We used the ALFF method to
compare resting-state brain activities between firstepisode (drug-naïve) adolescents with major depressive
disorder and matched controls.
Methods
Sample
The process of recruiting subjects for the study is shown
in Figure 1.
Adolescent depression group
All participants were recruited from the pediatric
outpatient clinic at the Shanghai Mental Health Center,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine.
Inclusion criteria were: (a) under 18 years of age; (b)
right-handed; (c) met diagnostic criteria for major
depressive disorder specified in the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition
(DSM-IV) (the reliability and validity of DSM-IV in China
is excellent[13]); (d) no previous depressive episode; (e)
no history of taking antidepressants or other psychiatric
medications; (f) normal intelligence (Wechsler
Intelligence Test for child [WISC-CR] or for adults [WAISRC] score ≥85); and (g) the adolescent and his or her
legal guardian provided written informed consent to
participate in the study. Exclusion criteria were: (a)
a history of dependence or abuse of psychoactive
substances; (b) a history of organic mental disorder,
schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, personality disorder, or
other mental disorder; (c) a history of serious physical
illness; (d) a history of degenerative neurological
diseases, brain trauma, or cerebrovascular disease;
(e) not suitable for magnetic resonance examinations
because of metal implant; or (f) pregnancy.In total, 17 patients were recruited. Two patients
who were diagnosed with bipolar disorder in followup visits were excluded. Therefore, there were 15
adolescents in the case group including 10 males and
5 females. Their duration of illness ranged from 1 to 48
months (median=12 months).
Control group
The control group included adolescents who had
never had depressive symptoms and never met DSMIV diagnostic criteria for depression or other mental
disorders. Recruited via community advertisements,
they were matched with cases who had completed
the assessment on age, gender, and level of education.
Inclusion criteria were: (a) under 18 years old; (b)
healthy; (c) right-handed; (d) Wechsler Intelligence Test
(for children or adults) score ≥85; (e) in good health
during the week prior to the study without taking any
medications; and (f) the adolescent and his or her
legal guardian provided written informed consent
to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria were:
(a) a family history of depression or other mental or
neurological disorder (in parents, sibs, or grandparents);
(b) a history of dependence or abuse of psychoactive
substances; (c) a history of mental disorders or recently
taking medications that influence the central nervous
system; (d) a history of degenerative neurological
conditions, brain trauma, or cerebrovascular disease; (e)
not suitable for magnetic resonance examinations due
to metal implant; or (f) pregnancy.Seventeen adolescents were initially recruited for
the control group; one boy was excluded because of
a history of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
(ADHD). The 16 adolescent controls who completed the
evaluation included 10 males and 6 females.
Diagnosis and assessment
All participants in the study were independently
evaluated by two attending pediatric psychiatrists using
DSM-IV diagnostic criteria to confirm the diagnosis of
major depressive disorder and the Children’s Depression
Inventory (CDI) to assess the severity of depressive
symptoms.[14] The Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders
and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version
(K-SADS-PL, kappa in China is 0.87[15]) was administered
to evaluate the present and past history of mental
disorders. Participants also completed the Wechsler
Intelligence Test for children [WISC-CR] or, if over 16
years of age, for adults [WAIS-RC] for the evaluation of
intelligence.
Magnetic resonance imaging
We used the 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging
system (General Electric) for MRI scans. Routine
imaging included T1WI and T2WI to screen for organic
pathologies. Resting-state MRI was used to collect BOLD
and echo-planar imaging (EPI).The parameter settings for the MRI scans were:
TR=2000ms, TE=30ms, FOV=230x230mm2, and
matrix=64x64mm2. Thirty-three layers of 4 mm each
were continuously scanned. During the resting state
scanning, no tasks were assigned to participants and
participants laid awake on their back with eyes closed.
Participants were asked not to actively think about
anything in particular during the procedure.
Processing of resting-state images
Data Processing Assistant for Resting-State fMRI
(DPARSF2.0) software (Beijing Normal University) was
used to analyze resting-state functional brain images.
DPARSF was developed based on Statistical Parametric
Mapping (SPM8) and Resting-State fMRI Data Analysis
Toolkit (REST).The following procedures were carried out to
eliminate the effects of excessive head movements
during the procedure. (a) Due to the instability of the
signals at the beginning of the evaluation, data for
the first ten time points were eliminated. (b) Subject
motion was determined in rotation and translation; the
maximum motion of any analyzed subject was 2.5 mm
or 2.5°. (c) Spatial normalization (SN) was applied to the
data; given anatomical differences in subjects’ brains,
the fMRI results had to be standardized based on the
SPM standard EPI template. (d) The data were smoothed
using a Gaussian kernel of full width at half maximum
of 4 mm. The main goals of these adjustments were to
ensure that the data approximates the Gaussian random
field (GRF) so it meets the statistical assumptions required
to conduct the SPM, and to improve the signal to noise
ratio. Alignment of images and spatial standardization
changes the correlation between voxels, and Gaussian
smoothing can ensure that neighboring voxels share
more information. After the above procedures, ALFF results were assessed. Before calculating the ALFF, we
performed linear drift correction and band-pass filtering
to the smoothed images. The frequency range was
0.01-0.08 Hz.[6] The SPM images obtained through the
estimation step were used for the final analysis.
Statistical analyses
The standardized ALFF images from the two groups were
compared using the SPM8 tool kit for MATLAB. Next,
the statistical atlas of the brains was superimposed
onto the averaged images of MNI T1 to devise the
resting-state ALFF brain images that showed statistical
differences between the two groups. The threshold for
statistical differences in stimulated images were p<0.005
(before correction) and the minimum size of the tested
brain regions was 20 voxel. In brain regions that showed
differences, boxes were used to highlight regions with
higher ALFF, and arrows for regions with lower ALFF.
Results
Participants in the depressed group were 11 to 18
years of age while those in the control group were 10
to 17 years of age. The mean (sd) age in both groups
was 15 (2) years. There were 10 males and 5 females
in the depression group, and 10 males and 6 females
in the control group. Adolescents in the depression
group had 4 to 13 (median=9) years of education;
those in the control group had 3 to 12 (median=9.5)
years of education. The differences in age, gender,
and education level between the two groups were not
statistically significant. The mean (sd) scores of the
ChildrenDepression Inventory (CDI), were 22.1 (9.2) in the depression group and 9.4 (5.7) in the control group
(t=4.68, p<0.001).The amplitude of low frequency fluctuations
(ALFF) measure derived from analysis of the fMRI was
compared between the case group and the control
group in all brain regions 20 voxel or larger. The ten
regions in which there was a significant difference
between cases and controls (specified as p-values
for the independent t-tests of<0.005) are shown in
Table 1. During the resting state, the depression group
had higher mean ALFF than the control group in the
posterior cingulate gyrus, left inferior temporal gyrus,
right superior temporal gyrus, right insula, right parietal
lobe, and right fusiform gyrus. However, the depression
group had a lower mean ALFF than the control group in
the right cuneate, left cuneate, left occipital lobe, and
left medial frontal lobe.List of brain areas ≥20 voxel in size with significant differences (p<0.005) in the amplitude of low
frequency fluctuation (ALFF) during the resting state between the depression group and the control groupaMontreal Neurological Institute (MNI) coordinates (mm).The brain regions that showed between-group
differences in resting-state ALFF were superimposed
on a single T1 template. As shown in Figure 2, arrows
mark areas where the depression group had higher
ALFF activation than the control group and rectangles
mark areas where the depression group had lower ALFF
activation than the control group.
Main findings
The depressedpatients participating in this study were
drug naïve adolescents who had just experienced their
first depressive episode. This unique sample made it
possible to exclude three factors that may confound
assessments of the relationship between brain functioning and depression: age, number of depressive
episodes, and use of antidepressant medications.The development of the neurological system is a
complex, ongoing process with different characteristics
at different stages in the life cycle. In children and
adolescents, using resting-state fMRI to assess brain
function has many advantages over other neuroimaging
techniques;[16] for example, the data collection
process does not involve task performance so it
can be completed within five minutes. Supekar and
colleagues[17] found that compared to brain functioning
in adults, adolescent resting-state brain functioning
shows more connection between the sub-cortical areas
and major sensory regions, and more connections
between the corpus callosum and the paralimbic
structure. In contrast, the adult brain shows more cortexcortex connections between the paralimbic structure,
limbic structure, and corpus callosum. The adolescent
brain shows higher levels of separation in functioning
while the adult brain shows a greater integration of
high-level functioning. A previous study compared
resting-state brain network connections among children,
adolescents, and adults using the anterior cingulate as
the seed and found variations in patterns of functional
connectivity in children and adults.[16] Specifically,
children had a more diffuse pattern of functional
connectivity with the voxel proximal to the seed
region of interest while adults had more focal patterns
of functional connectivity and a greater number of
significantly correlated voxels at long distances from the
seed. Adolescents demonstrated intermediate patterns
of functional connectivity between these two patterns.[18] Findings from this study showed both similarities and
differences in brain imaging results between adolescents
and adults. This highlights the importance of conducting
separate studies among adolescents in the assessment
of brain development and abnormal neuropsychological
conditions.According to a previous study, [19] resting-state left
brain functioning differs between individuals during the
first depressive episode (incidence cases) compared
to that of individuals during subsequent depressive
episodes.Individuals with multiple episodes had a
higher amplitude of low-frequency waves in the left
putamen, left middle frontal gyrus, and left insula.
In fact, there is a positive correlation between the
number of depressive episodes and the amplitude
of low-frequency waves in the left brain and in the
left putamen (r=0.450 p=0.021; r=0.535 p=0.004,
respectively). These findings support hypotheses about
a relationship between duration of depression and brain
functioning.Use of antidepressants may also influence brain
functioning in individuals with depression. For example,
Sun and colleagues[20] found increased BOLD in the
front right anterior cingulate, the bilateral dorsolateral frontal lobe, the right orbital frontal cortex, the
temporal cortex, the bilateral precuneus, the back
anterior cingulate, and the right occipital eye field after
eight weeks of treatment among a group of individuals
with first-episode depression who were responsive
to antidepressant treatment. They also found
reversion to abnormal brain functioning after stopping
antidepressant treatment.This current study eliminated the influence of
age, multiple relapses, and medications use and, thus,
provided direct evidence about the characteristics of
brain functioning during the resting state in adolescents
with major depression. We found that compared to
matched controls, depressed adolescents in the resting
state had lower ALFF in the bilateral cuneate lobe, left
occipital lobe, and left medial frontal lobe, and higher
ALFF in the posterior cingulate, left inferior temporal
gyrus, right superior temporal gyrus, right insula, right
parietal lobe, and the right gyri fusiformis.The medial frontal gyrus is part of the medial
prefrontal cortex (MPFC). The MPFC and posterior
cingulate are both part of the default network which
includes the medial prefrontal cortex, the posterior
cingulate, the inferior parietal lobule, the lateral
temporal cortex, and the hippocampus.[21] Damage
in this circuit can induce disturbance in mood and
cognition, as seen in depressive disorders. The medial
frontal gyrus plays a key role in the default network in
terms of the processing, recognition and regulation of
emotions. Abnormal activities of neurons in the medial
frontal gyrus can lead to dysfunctional mood regulation,
which is the pathological basis of the changes in
mood, behavior, cognition, and endocrinology seen
in depression.[22] Jin and colleagues[23] also reported
dysfunctional medial prefrontal cortex among
adolescents with first-episode depression. Guo and
colleagues[8] found lower ALFF in the right medial frontal
cortex among treatment responsive individuals with
depression compared to controls. There is also evidence
about volume change of the medial prefrontal cortex
in depression.[24] Drevets[25] found that endophenotypic
changes of depression included reduced volume of
the left anterior hemisphere and increased volume
in the right cingulate gyrus and the orbital frontal
cortex. The anterior hemisphere includes the medial
prefrontal cortex, which participates in the regulation
of emotions. This evidence supports our finding of
a relationship between abnormal activities of the
spontaneous neurons in the medial frontal gyrus and
the development of mood and cognitive symptoms in
depression.The current study also found lower mean ALFF
in the left temporal lope and in the bilateral cuneate
nucleus among the adolescents in the depression
group. A previous study found lower concentrations
of GABA in the occipital cortex – which includes the
cuneus – among individuals with depression.[24] Guo and
colleagues[8] found lower ALFF in the cuneate nucleus
and lingual gyrus among individuals with treatment
resistant depression and lower ALFF in the occipital
lobe among individuals responsive to antidepressant
treatment. This is in line with our finding of abnormal
spontaneous neuronal activities under the resting state
in depression. Chantiluke and colleagues[26] found lower
activities in the occipital lobe during attention tasks
among adolescents with depression. Together with
findings from previous studies, our results support the
involvement of the occipital lobe (including the cuneate
nucleus) in the development of depression.The posterior cingulate is related to sensory
functioning and participates in visual memory, the
processing of spatial information, proprioceptive
sensibility, and the processing of emotions.[27] Yao and
colleagues found decreased functional connectivity
between the posterior cingulate, the middle prefrontal
cortex, and the frontal cuneate nucleus among
individuals with depression. They postulated that these
changes can reinforce memories of negative experiences
while reducing memories of positive circumstances
and, thus, produce sustained negative emotions.[28] Structural imaging studies have documented smaller
volume of the posterior cingulate among patients
with depression.[29] PET and single photon emission
computerized tomography (SPECT) studies also found
increased metabolism or blood flow in the posterior
cingulate.[7] Peterson and colleagues[30] found thinning
of multiple cortexes including the posterior cingulate
among individuals with a family history of depression.
The cingulate is a key structure of the limbic system.
Various areas of the posterior cingulate are closely
connected to the amygdala, hypothalamus, dorsolateral
prefrontal cortex, and the brain stem. These structures
play important roles in emotion, cognition, autonomic
nervous system functions, and mobile functions. One
possibility is that a dysfunctional posterior cingulate
causes connection failures with other related brain
areas and subsequently gives rise to depression. This is
consistent with our finding of higher ALFF in the right
posterior cingulate in the depression group.The insula plays an important role in the regulation
of emotions and pain in coordination with the
amygdala, interior cingulate, prefrontal cortex, and
hippocampus.[31] In this study, we found higher ALFF
in the insula among adolescents with depression. One
possible mechanism that could explain this result is that
the dysfunctional insula contributes to the negative
interpretation of physical symptoms and interpersonal
interactions. Our finding is consistent with Ding’s study
that documented increased ALFF in the right insula
among drug naïve adolescents with depression.[32] A
previous study reported decreased mobility and vigor
– symptoms of depression – among individuals with
stroke in the right insula compared to those with stroke
in the left insula or to those without insula stroke.
Therefore, disconnection of the insula with the interior
cingula and the frontal cortex can contribute to the
occurrence of these symptoms.[33] PET studies found
boosted bonding of 5-HTT (which is critical for 5-HTT
reuptake) in the insula, striatum, and thymus among
individuals experiencing a depressive episode compared to controls.[34] Takahashi and colleagues[35] found smaller
insula in individuals with current depression (cMDD)
and in individuals with a history of major depression
who were currently in remission (rMDD) compared with
controls. Jin and colleagues[23] also found dysfunctional
insula among drug naïve adolescents with first-episode
depression. Functional imaging studies found that
the insula, especially the front insula, prefrontal lobe,
and other parts of the limbic system participate in the
regulation of emotions (e.g., guilt and sadness). Our
findings are in line with findings from these studies.The medial occipitotemporal gyrus is believed to
play a part in the reading of facial expressions. Correct
reading and interpretation of facial expressions is
important for social interactions and can influence
emotions. Surguladze and colleagues[36] found that
individuals with depression showed positive reactions
to sad facial expressions and neutral reactions to happy
ones, while the controls showed positive reactions
to happy facial expressions. Unlike our findings, Guo
and colleagues found lower ALFF in the left medial
occipitotemporal gyrus among individuals who
responded to antidepressant treatment. A possible
reason for the different findings is the influence of
antidepressants on measures of brain functioning.[8] In
brief, abnormal activities in the medial occipitotemporal
gyrus may lead to social withdrawal and negative
cognition in depression.The inferior temporal gyrus is located below the
middle temporal gyrus; it participates in vision and
in various cognitive processes.[37] Dysfunction of the
inferior temporal gyrus has been linked to disrupted
working memory.[38] Another study found that the
inferior temporal gyrus is an important component
of the network which connects the frontal, temporal,
parietal, and occipital lobes; a network that has
been associated with the outcome of antidepressant
treatment.[23],[39] Jin and colleagues[23] found dysfunctions
of the temporal cortex in drug naïve adolescents with
first-episode depression. And Guo and colleagues[8] found higher ALFF in the inferior temporal cortex among
individuals with depression. Results from our study
confirmed the results of these studies which highlight
the role of the inferior temporal lobe in depression.
Limitations
Small sample size and the relatively large age range
of the participating adolescents are limitations of the
current study. Due to differential dropout rates between
groups, there were 15 cases and 16 controls in the final
analysis so we did not achieve perfect 1:1 matching of
cases and controls. Future studies with larger sample
sizes are needed to explore potential differences across
age groups and across different types of depression.
Implications
This study among adolescents with drug-naïve, firstepisode depression identified abnormal brain functions
during the resting state in several brain regions related
to emotions. This helps to confirm the biological basis
of depression. Further studies comparing depressionrelated brain changes in children, adolescents, adults,
and elder individuals with depression will help to clarify
how the biological characteristics of depression vary
over the different stages of the life cycle.
Table 1.
List of brain areas ≥20 voxel in size with significant differences (p<0.005) in the amplitude of low
frequency fluctuation (ALFF) during the resting state between the depression group and the control group
Brain region
number of
voxels
X axisa
Y axisa
Z axisa
t-value
at the peak activity point
in the brain region
Mean ALFF in depression group greater
than mean ALFF in control group
posterior cingulate
20
9
-50
26
3.68
left inferior temporal gyrus
22
-42
-6
-42
5.29
right superior temporal gyrus
24
45
-24
9
3.56
right insula
27
48
-6
12
3.43
right parietal lobe
20
36
-36
30
3.12
right medial occipitotemporal gyri
40
27
6
-45
4.68
Mean ALFF in depression group less
than mean ALFF in control group
left cuneate lobe
40
-15
-78
3
4.45
right cuneate lobe
24
15
-84
3
3.54
left temporal lobe
22
-45
-63
-12
3.61
left medial frontal gyrus
22
-8.4
46
23
3.22
aMontreal Neurological Institute (MNI) coordinates (mm).
Authors: Dara M Cannon; Masanori Ichise; Denise Rollis; Jacqueline M Klaver; Shilpa K Gandhi; Dennis S Charney; Husseini K Manji; Wayne C Drevets Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-08-02 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Helen S Mayberg; Andres M Lozano; Valerie Voon; Heather E McNeely; David Seminowicz; Clement Hamani; Jason M Schwalb; Sidney H Kennedy Journal: Neuron Date: 2005-03-03 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Koene R A Van Dijk; Trey Hedden; Archana Venkataraman; Karleyton C Evans; Sara W Lazar; Randy L Buckner Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2009-11-04 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Greg J Siegle; Stuart R Steinhauer; Michael E Thase; V Andrew Stenger; Cameron S Carter Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2002-05-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Amit Anand; Yu Li; Yang Wang; Jingwei Wu; Sujuan Gao; Lubna Bukhari; Vincent P Mathews; Andrew Kalnin; Mark J Lowe Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-05-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Toshiaki Onitsuka; Martha E Shenton; Dean F Salisbury; Chandlee C Dickey; Kiyoto Kasai; Sarah K Toner; Melissa Frumin; Ron Kikinis; Ferenc A Jolesz; Robert W McCarley Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Tsutomu Takahashi; Murat Yücel; Valentina Lorenzetti; Kazue Nakamura; Sarah Whittle; Mark Walterfang; Michio Suzuki; Christos Pantelis; Nicholas B Allen Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2009-06-06 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: Rachel H Jacobs; Edward R Watkins; Amy T Peters; Claudia G Feldhaus; Alyssa Barba; Julie Carbray; Scott A Langenecker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-23 Impact factor: 3.240