Literature DB >> 25316715

Usability and training differences between two personal insulin pumps.

Noel E Schaeffer1, Linda J Parks2, Erik T Verhoef2, Timothy S Bailey3, Alan B Schorr4, Trent Davis3, Jean Halford5, Becky Sulik5.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if there were usability and training differences between the Medtronic MiniMed Paradigm Revel Insulin Pump and the Tandem Diabetes Care t:slim Insulin Pump during use by representative users, performing representative tasks, in a simulated use environment. This study utilized a between-subjects experimental design with a total of 72 participants from 5 sites across the United States. Study participants were randomized to either the Revel pump group or the t:slim Pump group. Participants were 18 years of age or older and managed their diabetes using multiple daily insulin injections. Dependent variables included training time, training satisfaction, time on task, task failures, System Usability Scale (SUS) ratings, perceived task difficulty, and a pump survey that measured different aspects of the pumps and training sessions. There was a statistically significant difference in training times and error rates between the t:slim and Revel groups. The training time difference represented a 27% reduction in time to train on the t:slim versus the Revel pump. There was a 65% reduction in participants' use error rates between the t:slim and the Revel group. The t:slim Pump had statistically significant training and usability advantages over the Revel pump. The reduction in training time may have been a result of an optimized information architecture, an intuitive navigational layout, and an easy-to-read screen. The reduction in use errors with the t:slim may have been a result of dynamic error handling and active confirmation screens, which may have prevented programming errors.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  engineering psychology; human factors; industrial psychology; insulin pump; medical device safety; psychology; research; use error; user experience research; user-centered design

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25316715      PMCID: PMC4604581          DOI: 10.1177/1932296814555158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  12 in total

1.  Reducing errors in medicine.

Authors:  D M Berwick; L L Leape
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-17

2.  Tests of glycemia in diabetes.

Authors:  David E Goldstein; Randie R Little; Rodney A Lorenz; John I Malone; David M Nathan; Charles M Peterson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 3.  The role of human factors in the design and development of an insulin pump.

Authors:  Noel E Schaeffer
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

4.  Though costly, insulin pens facilitate better adherence.

Authors:  Thomas Reinke
Journal:  Manag Care       Date:  2013-06

Review 5.  Improving patient compliance with asthma therapy.

Authors:  K R Chapman; L Walker; S Cluley; L Fabbri
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.415

6.  Patient safety, potential adverse drug events, and medical device design: a human factors engineering approach.

Authors:  L Lin; K J Vicente; D J Doyle
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 7.  How to achieve good compliance with inhaled asthma therapy.

Authors:  Graham K Crompton
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.415

8.  Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence.

Authors:  James P Boyle; Theodore J Thompson; Edward W Gregg; Lawrence E Barker; David F Williamson
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2010-10-22

9.  Human factors research applied: the development of a personal touch screen insulin pump and users' perceptions of actual use.

Authors:  Noel E Schaeffer
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  Nutritionist visits, diabetes classes, and hospitalization rates and charges: the Urban Diabetes Study.

Authors:  Jessica M Robbins; Gail E Thatcher; David A Webb; Vivian G Valdmanis
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  2 in total

1.  Insulin Pumps and Remote Software Updates: A New Way Forward.

Authors:  Noel E Schaeffer; Linda J Parks; Erik T Verhoef; Corey A Morgan; Mikhail Stal
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-09-18

Review 2.  Technology in the management of type 2 diabetes: Present status and future prospects.

Authors:  Aideen Daly; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.408

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.