Literature DB >> 25316023

[Access to brain death diagnostics].

O Hoffmann1, F Masuhr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In Germany the diagnosis of brain death must strictly adhere to the expert guidelines of the German chamber of physicians. For patients with primary supratentorial or hypoxic brain injury aged 2 years or more, repeat clinical examinations or one complete examination combined with an ancillary test are equally accurate. This study aimed to identify factors with potential impact on whether and by which means a formal brain death examination is pursued.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out of recorded data of all patients who died in the acute phase after severe brain injury during mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit and who were registered at the north east regional bureau of the German organ procurement organization (Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation) between 2001 and 2010.
RESULTS: Of 5988 reported patients, a protocol-specified brain death examination was initiated in 3023, leading to a diagnosis of brain death in 2592. All other patients died due to permanent cardiac arrest. Patients were less likely to undergo brain death examinations in the presence of one or more of the following characteristics: perceived medical contraindication for organ donation, patient age greater than 69 years, hypoxic brain damage, treatment in a hospital without neurological and neurosurgical departments and death on a weekend or public holiday. In 2192 patients (72.5%), neurologists or neurosurgeons participated in the diagnostic procedures and in 926 of these cases members of specialized external diagnostic expert teams were involved. Ancillary tests were rarely used by physicians based at the treating hospitals (31.1%) but on a regular basis by members of the external teams (93.4%). The risk of death due to permanent cardiac arrest before completion of the brain death examination was increased approximately 7-fold when a neurological or neurosurgical consultation with ancillary studies was not performed. DISCUSSION: Access to neurological expertise and to ancillary tests has a significant impact on the provision of guideline-specified diagnostic procedures for suspected brain death. Centralized diagnostic teams offer an effective means to support qualified brain death examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25316023     DOI: 10.1007/s00115-014-4171-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.214


  2 in total

1.  [Diagnosis of brain death in the admission department of the Neurologic Clinic of Erlangen University from 1984 to 1994].

Authors:  J G Heckmann; C J Lang; I Hauser; B Neundörfer
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 0.628

2.  Second brain death examination may negatively affect organ donation.

Authors:  D Lustbader; D O'Hara; E F M Wijdicks; L MacLean; W Tajik; A Ying; E Berg; M Goldstein
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 9.910

  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  Renaissance of criticism on the concept of brain death--the role of legal medicine in the context of the interdisciplinary discussion.

Authors:  L Markert; B Bockholdt; M A Verhoff; S Heinze; M Parzeller
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  [Ancillary procedures in the diagnostics of brain death. Utilization, results and consequences in northeastern Germany].

Authors:  O Hoffmann; F Masuhr
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  [Diagnostics of irreversible brain death : Limitations and potential for improvement from the perspective of transplantation officials].

Authors:  Olaf Martin Hoffmann; Corinna Dinse; Florian Masuhr
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.041

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.