Literature DB >> 25316022

Antibiotic resistance patterns and PCR-ribotyping of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from swine and dogs in Italy.

Patrizia Spigaglia1, Ilenia Drigo2, Fabrizio Barbanti3, Paola Mastrantonio3, Luca Bano2, Cosetta Bacchin2, Cinzia Puiatti2, Elena Tonon2, Giacomo Berto2, Fabrizio Agnoletti2.   

Abstract

Recent studies suggest animals, in particular farm and companion animals, as possible reservoir for Clostridium difficile human pathogenic strains. The aim of this study was to give a first characterization of C. difficile isolates from Italian swine and dogs. In total, 10 different PCR-ribotypes were identified among porcine strains and six among canine strains. The predominant type found among porcine strains was 078 (50%), whereas the most frequently detected among canine strains was the non-toxinogenic 010 (64%). Considering the CLSI breakpoints, 60% of porcine isolates was resistant to ERY, 35% to MXF, 15% to CLI, 5% to RIF, and none to MTZ or VAN. Among dogs, 51% of strains was resistant to CLI, 46% to ERY, 21% to MTZ and 5% to MXF or RIF, and none to VAN. Five porcine strains (10%) and 9 canine isolates (41%) were MDR. Interestingly, 8 MDR canine strains were highly resistant to MTZ, with MICs ≥32 mg/L. Considering the EUCAST cut-off for MTZ (MIC >2 mg/L), 13 canine isolates and one porcine strain were found with reduced susceptibility to MTZ (MICs ranging from 3 to ≥256 mg/L). Swine and canine strains showing resistance or reduced susceptibility to MTZ belonged to PCR-ribotype 010 and 078. These PCR-ribotypes have been associated to reduced susceptibility to MTZ also in human, suggesting a potential risk for the emergence of C. difficile strains resistant to the current first-line antibiotic for CDI treatment. The agar incorporation method (AIM) was confirmed as the best method to detect C. difficile strains with this phenotype also after strains manipulations. The results obtained add further evidences about the possible role of animals as source of MDR C. difficile strains and reservoir of antibiotic resistance determinants.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animals; Antibiotic; Clostridium difficile; PCR-ribotyping; Resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25316022     DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaerobe        ISSN: 1075-9964            Impact factor:   3.331


  9 in total

Review 1.  Update on Antimicrobial Resistance in Clostridium difficile: Resistance Mechanisms and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Zhong Peng; Dazhi Jin; Hyeun Bum Kim; Charles W Stratton; Bin Wu; Yi-Wei Tang; Xingmin Sun
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Clostridium difficile in Food and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  C Rodriguez; B Taminiau; J Van Broeck; M Delmée; G Daube
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 3.  Recent advances in the understanding of antibiotic resistance in Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Patrizia Spigaglia
Journal:  Ther Adv Infect Dis       Date:  2016-02

4.  The emergence of Clostridium difficile PCR-ribotype 001 in Slovakia.

Authors:  O Nyc; M Krutova; A Liskova; J Matejkova; J Drabek; E J Kuijper
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  The duration of antibiotic treatment is associated with carriage of toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains of Clostridioides difficile in dogs.

Authors:  Carolina Albuquerque; Davide Pagnossin; Kirsten Landsgaard; Jessica Simpson; Derek Brown; June Irvine; Denise Candlish; Alison E Ridyard; Gillian Douce; Caroline Millins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Preliminary studies on isolates of Clostridium difficile from dogs and exotic pets.

Authors:  Sara Andrés-Lasheras; Inma Martín-Burriel; Raúl Carlos Mainar-Jaime; Mariano Morales; Ed Kuijper; José L Blanco; Manuel Chirino-Trejo; Rosa Bolea
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  The first isolation of Clostridium difficile RT078/ST11 from pigs in China.

Authors:  Li-Juan Zhang; Ling Yang; Xi-Xi Gu; Pin-Xian Chen; Jia-Li Fu; Hong-Xia Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Dogs as carriers of virulent and resistant genotypes of Clostridioides difficile.

Authors:  S K Finsterwalder; I Loncaric; A Cabal; M P Szostak; L M Barf; M Marz; F Allerberger; I A Burgener; A Tichy; A T Feßler; S Schwarz; S Monecke; R Ehricht; W Ruppitsch; J Spergser; F Künzel
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.954

Review 9.  Antimicrobial Resistance and Reduced Susceptibility in Clostridium difficile: Potential Consequences for Induction, Treatment, and Recurrence of C. difficile Infection.

Authors:  Simon D Baines; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.