Literature DB >> 25315937

[Effects of levosimendan on hemodynamics and cardiac function in patients with septic shock].

Mingxing Fang1, Shimin Dong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of levosimendan on hemodynamics and cardiac function in patients with septic shock.
METHODS: A prospective single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted. The patients with septic shock admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine of the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from June 2011 to October 2013 were enrolled. The patients with septic shock received the conventional treatment according to international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Thirty-six patients received the examination of echocardiography and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)≤ 0.45 after fluid resuscitation were enrolled the study, who were divided into two groups according to random number table, with 18 cases in each group. After the conventional treatment, the patients in dobutamine group received intravenous injection of 5 μg × kg⁻¹ min⁻¹ dobutamine for 48 hours immediately after fluid resuscitation, and those in levosimendan group received a 24-hour infusion of 5 μg × kg⁻¹ min⁻¹ dobutamine followed by a 24-hour infusion of 0.2 μg × kg⁻¹ × min⁻¹ levosimendan. The hemodynamics and cardiac function were evaluated by pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) and ultrasound during treatment.
RESULTS: Compared with dobutamine group, after the treatment in the levosimendan group, stroke volume index (SVI), cardiac index (CI) and left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) were significantly increased [SVI (mL/m²): 39.8 ± 5.4 vs. 37.5 ± 4.5, t=-2.762, P=0.020; CI (L × min⁻¹ × m⁻²): 4.6 ± 0.7 vs. 3.6 ± 0.7, t=-9.829, P=0.000; LVSWI (kg ×min⁻ ¹ m⁻²): 33.7 ± 2.4 vs. 28.2 ± 1.2, t=-6.307, P=0.000], and central venous pressure (CVP), intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) and extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) were significantly decreased [CVP (mmHg, 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa): 8.2 ± 0.9 vs. 12.1 ± 0.8, t=3.928, P=0.002; ITBVI (mL/m²): 820 ± 42 vs. 978 ± 69, t=9.472, P=0.000; EVLWI (mL/kg): 6.1 ± 1.6 vs. 8.9 ± 1.7, t=4.467, P=0.001]. Cardiac ultrasound showed that compared with dobutamine group, in the levosimendan group, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESI) and end-diastolic volume (LVEDI) were significantly lowered [LVESI (mL/m²): 32.7 ± 9.2 vs. 48.2 ± 13.4, t=0.882, P=0.000; LVEDI (mL/m²): 61.7 ± 11.4 vs. 78.6 ± 13.6, t=2.453, P=0.032], and the LVEF was significantly increased (0.463 ± 0.068 vs. 0.383 ± .085, t=-2.439, P=0.035). Levosimendan also could decrease the lactic acid (mmol/L: 3.4 ± 1.1 vs. 5.2 ± 1.2, t=3.346, P=0.007), and increase the lactate clearance rate (mL/min: 73.2 ± 13.5 vs. 47.6 ± 11.8, t=-4.079, P=0.002), 24-hour urinary output (mL: 2 213.4 ± 354.0 vs. 1 533.8 ± 402.0, t=6.342, P=0.000) and 24-hour cumulative intake (mL: 5 746.6 ± 420.0 vs. 4 156.7 ± 215.0, t=7.126, P=0.000). There were no significant differences in total volume of norepinephrine,mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) and 28-day mortality between two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Levosimendan can increase cardiac ejection function, reduce the heart blood and vascular preload, intrathoracic lung water, improve heart function and systemic hemodynamic indexes of patients with septic shock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25315937     DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue


  8 in total

Review 1.  Vasoactive agents for the treatment of sepsis.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Kun Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-09

2.  Combination era, using combined vasopressors showed benefits in treating septic shock patients: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chongxiang Chen; Lanlan Pang; Yanyan Wang; Tianmeng Wen; Wu Yu; Xiaolei Yue; Yuming Rong; Wei Liao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

3.  Effect of small-dose levosimendan on mortality rates and organ functions in Chinese elderly patients with sepsis.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Shikui Li
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  Comparative efficacy of vasoactive medications in patients with septic shock: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lu Cheng; Jing Yan; Shutang Han; Qiuhua Chen; Mingqi Chen; Hua Jiang; Jun Lu
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Multiorgan Drug Action of Levosimendan in Critical Illnesses.

Authors:  Jian Pan; Yun-Mei Yang; Jian-Yong Zhu; Yuan-Qiang Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Levosimendan versus dobutamine for sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dong-Hua Liu; Yi-Le Ning; Yan-Yan Lei; Jing Chen; Yan-Yan Liu; Xin-Feng Lin; Zhong-Qi Yang; Shao-Xiang Xian; Wei-Tao Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of levosimendan on mortality in patients with septic shock: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Benji Wang; Rujie Chen; Xianyang Guo; Wenwu Zhang; Jianjian Hu; Yuqiang Gong; Bihuan Cheng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-10

8.  Effect of levosimendan on mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Wei Chang; Jian-Feng Xie; Jing-Yuan Xu; Yi Yang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.