Literature DB >> 25315905

Strength through unity: spatial affinity between morphs improves fitness in incompatible heterostylous Melochia (Malvaceae) species.

Michel Faife-Cabrera1, Luis Navarro, Victoria Ferrero.   

Abstract

In heterostylous plants, both stylar polymorphism and incompatibility system favor legitimate pollination among individuals. Weak or partial expression of incompatibility may ensure progeny when mates or pollinators are scarce in unstable habitats, but under these conditions plants with heteromorphic incompatibility would be in disadvantage. In this work we determine how the spatial distribution of morphs and the effect of proximity to the nearest potential mates affect plants' reproductive output in four Melochia species. The general prediction of decreasing reproductive success with an increasing isolation of floral morphs in plants with heteromorphic incompatibility was corroborated only in one species (i.e. M. tomentosa). Meanwhile, the other species exhibit a spatial affinity between morphs (i.e. the number of individuals with the nearest neighbor of the opposite morph exceeds expectations upon a random distribution). For M. savannarum and M. villosa we could not detect any effect of proximity to potential mates on the seed-ovule ratio. This may be due to: (1) existence of pollinators with long flying distances, like butterflies, in the populations and/or, (2) the possible occurrence of resource limitation. Spatial affinity between morphs in populations of heterostylous plants with heteromorphic incompatibility system increases reproductive success and may facilitate colonization of ephemeral habitats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25315905     DOI: 10.1007/s10265-014-0668-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plant Res        ISSN: 0918-9440            Impact factor:   2.629


  20 in total

1.  Floral traits and pollination systems in the Caatinga, a Brazilian tropical dry forest.

Authors:  Isabel Cristina Machado; Ariadna Valentina Lopes
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Unusual heterostyly: style dimorphism and self-incompatibility are not tightly associated in Lithodora and Glandora (Boraginaceae).

Authors:  V Ferrero; J Arroyo; S Castro; L Navarro
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  A test of simultaneous resource and pollen limitation in Stylidium armeria.

Authors:  Rowan H Brookes; Linley K Jesson; Martin Burd
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  The effects of pollen composition on fitness components in a neotropical herb.

Authors:  Douglas W Schemske; Lynn P Pautler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  DISTYLY, SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY, AND EVOLUTION IN MELOCHIA.

Authors:  Franklin W Martin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  SPATIAL SEGREGATION OF PINS AND THRUMS IN POPULATIONS OF HEDYOTIS NIGRICANS.

Authors:  Donald A Levin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 7.  The evolution of polymorphic sexual systems in daffodils (Narcissus).

Authors:  Spencer C H Barrett; Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Plant-pollinator interactions in New Caledonia influenced by introduced honey bees.

Authors:  Makoto Kato; Atsushi Kawakita
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  The role of inbreeding depression and mating system in the evolution of heterostyly.

Authors:  Jennifer J Weber; Stephen G Weller; Ann K Sakai; Olga V Tsyusko; Travis C Glenn; César A Domínguez; Francisco E Molina-Freaner; Juan Fornoni; Mike Tran; Nhu Nguyen; Karen Nguyen; Lien-Khuong Tran; Greg Joice; Ellen Harding
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Asymmetrical mating patterns and the evolution of biased style-morph ratios in a tristylous daffodil.

Authors:  Kathryn A Hodgins; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.