Deniz Çevirme1, Eray Aksoy2, Yaşar Gökhan Gül3, Hasan Erdem2, Taylan Adademir2, Cengiz Köksal2, Kürşat Bozkurt4. 1. Cardiovascular Surgery Department, Kartal Kosuyolu Yuksek Ihtisas Research and Education Hospital, Turkey dnzcvr@hotmail.com. 2. Cardiovascular Surgery Department, Kartal Kosuyolu Yuksek Ihtisas Research and Education Hospital, Turkey. 3. School of Health Sciences, University of Istanbul Bilgi, Turkey. 4. Cardiovascular Surgery Department, Cerrahpaşa Medicine Faculty, University of Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Whether medical therapy alone may reduce the amputation rates in patients with chronic limb ischemia and who are unsuitable for revascularization is a controversial topic. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of 1 week infusion of iloprost in the treatment of patients with chronic limb ischemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients were included in the study. There were 23 men (85.2%) and 4 women (14.8%) with a mean age of 68.93 ± 14.84 years. Patients were considered eligible if they were unsuitable for surgical and endovascular revascularization. Follow-up was made on 10th day and 6th month and included ankle brachial index and clinical assessment. RESULTS: Minor side effects occurred in four patients (16.0%), but the treatment was continued. In-hospital mortality occurred in one patient (4.0%). Another two patients died and four patients received amputation until follow-up (overall mortality 11.1%). There was significant increase in mean ankle-brachial index values between 1st day and 10th day (p < 0.001), between 1st day and 6th month (p < 0.001), and between 10th day and 6th month (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: One-week treatment with iloprost may provide both long lasting symptomatic benefit and may improve hemodynamic parameters, which were shown to predict future amputation.
INTRODUCTION: Whether medical therapy alone may reduce the amputation rates in patients with chronic limb ischemia and who are unsuitable for revascularization is a controversial topic. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of 1 week infusion of iloprost in the treatment of patients with chronic limb ischemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients were included in the study. There were 23 men (85.2%) and 4 women (14.8%) with a mean age of 68.93 ± 14.84 years. Patients were considered eligible if they were unsuitable for surgical and endovascular revascularization. Follow-up was made on 10th day and 6th month and included ankle brachial index and clinical assessment. RESULTS: Minor side effects occurred in four patients (16.0%), but the treatment was continued. In-hospital mortality occurred in one patient (4.0%). Another two patients died and four patients received amputation until follow-up (overall mortality 11.1%). There was significant increase in mean ankle-brachial index values between 1st day and 10th day (p < 0.001), between 1st day and 6th month (p < 0.001), and between 10th day and 6th month (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: One-week treatment with iloprost may provide both long lasting symptomatic benefit and may improve hemodynamic parameters, which were shown to predict future amputation.