Literature DB >> 25315323

Nonsyntenic genes drive highly dynamic complementation of gene expression in maize hybrids.

Anja Paschold1, Nick B Larson2, Caroline Marcon1, James C Schnable3, Cheng-Ting Yeh4, Christa Lanz5, Dan Nettleton2, Hans-Peter Piepho6, Patrick S Schnable4, Frank Hochholdinger7.   

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays) displays an exceptional level of structural genomic diversity, which is likely unique among higher eukaryotes. In this study, we surveyed how the genetic divergence of two maize inbred lines affects the transcriptomic landscape in four different primary root tissues of their F1-hybrid progeny. An extreme instance of complementation was frequently observed: genes that were expressed in only one parent but in both reciprocal hybrids. This single-parent expression (SPE) pattern was detected for 2341 genes with up to 1287 SPE patterns per tissue. As a consequence, the number of active genes in hybrids exceeded that of their parents in each tissue by >400. SPE patterns are highly dynamic, as illustrated by their excessive degree of tissue specificity (80%). The biological significance of this type of complementation is underpinned by the observation that a disproportionally high number of SPE genes (75 to 82%) is nonsyntenic, as opposed to all expressed genes (36%). These genes likely evolved after the last whole-genome duplication and are therefore younger than the syntenic genes. In summary, SPE genes shape the remarkable gene expression plasticity between root tissues and complementation in maize hybrids, resulting in a tissue-specific increase of active genes in F1-hybrids compared with their inbred parents.
© 2014 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25315323      PMCID: PMC4247586          DOI: 10.1105/tpc.114.130948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell        ISSN: 1040-4651            Impact factor:   11.277


  39 in total

1.  Comparative population genomics of maize domestication and improvement.

Authors:  Matthew B Hufford; Xun Xu; Joost van Heerwaarden; Tanja Pyhäjärvi; Jer-Ming Chia; Reed A Cartwright; Robert J Elshire; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Kate E Guill; Shawn M Kaeppler; Jinsheng Lai; Peter L Morrell; Laura M Shannon; Chi Song; Nathan M Springer; Ruth A Swanson-Wagner; Peter Tiffin; Jun Wang; Gengyun Zhang; John Doebley; Michael D McMullen; Doreen Ware; Edward S Buckler; Shuang Yang; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Maize HapMap2 identifies extant variation from a genome in flux.

Authors:  Jer-Ming Chia; Chi Song; Peter J Bradbury; Denise Costich; Natalia de Leon; John Doebley; Robert J Elshire; Brandon Gaut; Laura Geller; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Michael Gore; Kate E Guill; Jim Holland; Matthew B Hufford; Jinsheng Lai; Meng Li; Xin Liu; Yanli Lu; Richard McCombie; Rebecca Nelson; Jesse Poland; Boddupalli M Prasanna; Tanja Pyhäjärvi; Tingzhao Rong; Rajandeep S Sekhon; Qi Sun; Maud I Tenaillon; Feng Tian; Jun Wang; Xun Xu; Zhiwu Zhang; Shawn M Kaeppler; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Michael D McMullen; Edward S Buckler; Gengyun Zhang; Yunbi Xu; Doreen Ware
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  XYLOGENESIS: INITIATION, PROGRESSION, AND CELL DEATH.

Authors:  Hiroo Fukuda
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1996-06

4.  Pervasive gene content variation and copy number variation in maize and its undomesticated progenitor.

Authors:  Ruth A Swanson-Wagner; Steven R Eichten; Sunita Kumari; Peter Tiffin; Joshua C Stein; Doreen Ware; Nathan M Springer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  Structural variation and genome complexity: is dispensable really dispensable?

Authors:  Fabio Marroni; Sara Pinosio; Michele Morgante
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 7.834

6.  Many or most genes in Arabidopsis transposed after the origin of the order Brassicales.

Authors:  Michael Freeling; Eric Lyons; Brent Pedersen; Maqsudul Alam; Ray Ming; Damon Lisch
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Differentiation of the maize subgenomes by genome dominance and both ancient and ongoing gene loss.

Authors:  James C Schnable; Nathan M Springer; Michael Freeling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants.

Authors:  Patrick S Schnable; Nathan M Springer
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 26.379

Review 9.  The molecular genetics of crop domestication.

Authors:  John F Doebley; Brandon S Gaut; Bruce D Smith
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 10.  A bountiful harvest: genomic insights into crop domestication phenotypes.

Authors:  Kenneth M Olsen; Jonathan F Wendel
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 26.379

View more
  24 in total

1.  Differentially Regulated Orthologs in Sorghum and the Subgenomes of Maize.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Daniel W Ngu; Daniel Carvalho; Zhikai Liang; Yumou Qiu; Rebecca L Roston; James C Schnable
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  A high-resolution tissue-specific proteome and phosphoproteome atlas of maize primary roots reveals functional gradients along the root axes.

Authors:  Caroline Marcon; Waqas Ahmed Malik; Justin W Walley; Zhouxin Shen; Anja Paschold; Laurie G Smith; Hans-Peter Piepho; Steven P Briggs; Frank Hochholdinger
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Stability of Single-Parent Gene Expression Complementation in Maize Hybrids upon Water Deficit Stress.

Authors:  Caroline Marcon; Anja Paschold; Waqas Ahmed Malik; Andrew Lithio; Jutta A Baldauf; Lena Altrogge; Nina Opitz; Christa Lanz; Heiko Schoof; Dan Nettleton; Hans-Peter Piepho; Frank Hochholdinger
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Heterotic patterns of primary and secondary metabolites in the oilseed crop Brassica juncea.

Authors:  Prabodh K Bajpai; Michael Reichelt; Rehna Augustine; Jonathan Gershenzon; Naveen C Bisht
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Variation burst during dedifferentiation and increased CHH-type DNA methylation after 30 years of in vitro culture of sweet orange.

Authors:  Xia Wang; Lili Ke; Shuting Wang; Jialing Fu; Jidi Xu; Yujin Hao; Chunying Kang; Wenwu Guo; Xiuxin Deng; Qiang Xu
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 6.793

6.  Gene expression variation explains maize seed germination heterosis.

Authors:  Jiong Wan; Qiyue Wang; Jiawen Zhao; Xuehai Zhang; Zhanyong Guo; Desheng Hu; Shujun Meng; Yuan Lin; Xiaoqian Qiu; Liqin Mu; Dong Ding; Jihua Tang
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 5.260

7.  Marginal regression models for clustered count data based on zero-inflated Conway-Maxwell-Poisson distribution with applications.

Authors:  Hyoyoung Choo-Wosoba; Steven M Levy; Somnath Datta
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Nonsyntenic Genes Drive Tissue-Specific Dynamics of Differential, Nonadditive, and Allelic Expression Patterns in Maize Hybrids.

Authors:  Jutta A Baldauf; Caroline Marcon; Anja Paschold; Frank Hochholdinger
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Dynamic patterns of circular and linear RNAs in maize hybrid and parental lines.

Authors:  Zi Luo; Jia Qian; Sijia Chen; Lin Li
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Oral secretions from Mythimna separata insects specifically induce defence responses in maize as revealed by high-dimensional biological data.

Authors:  Jinfeng Qi; Guiling Sun; Lei Wang; Chunxia Zhao; Christian Hettenhausen; Meredith C Schuman; Ian T Baldwin; Jing Li; Juan Song; Zhudong Liu; Guowang Xu; Xin Lu; Jianqiang Wu
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 7.228

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.