Literature DB >> 25315045

Diagnostic value of CMR in young patients with clinically suspected acute myocarditis is determined by cardiac enzymes.

Anca Florian1, Tim Schäufele, Anna Ludwig, Sabine Rösch, Ina Wenzelburger, Handan Yildiz, Udo Sechtem, Ali Yilmaz.   

Abstract

AIMS: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has become a valuable diagnostic tool for non-invasive diagnosis of acute myocarditis. However, since CMR studies are time- and cost-intensive and its diagnostic accuracy still not perfect, additional parameters are warranted to preselect and identify those individuals in whom a CMR study is likely to add crucial information regarding correct and timely diagnosis of acute myocarditis. The diagnostic value of CMR was evaluated in a population of young patients with clinically suspected acute myocarditis in relation to ECG and serum cardiac enzyme findings. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Only young patients aged ≤ 40 years in whom acute myocarditis was highly suspected based on their clinical symptoms, resting ECG findings and/or levels of cardiac enzymes (at presentation) were included to this study. After ruling out obstructive coronary artery disease, a multi-parametric CMR study was performed as part of the diagnostic work-up. The CMR protocol comprised cine sequences, T2-weighted edema imaging and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging on a 1.5-T MR scanner. 89 patients (28 ± 7 years, 89 % male) were included to this study presenting with symptoms of chest pain (85 %), dyspnea (26 %), fatigue (23 %) and/or palpitations (18 %). Pathological ECG changes were present in 72 patients (81 %). An elevated serum troponin level was measured in 45 patients (51 %). Pathological CMR findings (presence of edema and/or LGE) were detected in 35 patients (39 %). In detail, pathological CMR findings were detected in 36 % of patients with resting ECG changes and in 73 % of patients with troponin rise. In contrast, normal CMR results were obtained in 95 % of patients with negative troponin at presentation, but only in 41 % of patients with normal ECG. On multivariable analysis, a positive serum troponin was the only independent predictor for a pathological CMR finding (OR = 33.26, 95 % CI = 3.04-363.35, p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical use of non-invasive CMR in the work-up of clinically suspected "acute" myocarditis in young patients is only helpful and appropriately indicated in those ones with elevated cardiac enzymes. A pre-selection of such patients for CMR based on serum cardiac enzymes--but not on ECG recordings--may prevent a meaningless overuse of CMR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25315045     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-014-0770-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  29 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of CMR imaging compared with EMB in patients with suspected myocarditis.

Authors:  Philipp Lurz; Ingo Eitel; Julia Adam; Julia Steiner; Matthias Grothoff; Steffen Desch; Georg Fuernau; Suzanne de Waha; Mahdi Sareban; Christian Luecke; Karin Klingel; Reinhard Kandolf; Gerhard Schuler; Matthias Gutberlet; Holger Thiele
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05

Review 2.  Update on myocarditis.

Authors:  Ingrid Kindermann; Christine Barth; Felix Mahfoud; Christian Ukena; Matthias Lenski; Ali Yilmaz; Karin Klingel; Reinhard Kandolf; Udo Sechtem; Leslie T Cooper; Michael Böhm
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Presentation, patterns of myocardial damage, and clinical course of viral myocarditis.

Authors:  Heiko Mahrholdt; Anja Wagner; Claudia C Deluigi; Eva Kispert; Stefan Hager; Gabriel Meinhardt; Holger Vogelsberg; Peter Fritz; Juergen Dippon; C-Thomas Bock; Karin Klingel; Reinhard Kandolf; Udo Sechtem
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Electrocardiography of myocarditis revisited: clinical and prognostic significance of electrocardiographic changes.

Authors:  T Morgera; A Di Lenarda; L Dreas; B Pinamonti; F Humar; R Bussani; F Silvestri; D Chersevani; F Camerini
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging findings in acute myocarditis and correlation with immunohistological parameters.

Authors:  Rainer Röttgen; Robert Christiani; Patrick Freyhardt; Matthias Gutberlet; Hans Peter Schultheiss; Bernd Hamm; Uwe Kühl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Cardiac troponin T in patients with clinically suspected myocarditis.

Authors:  B Lauer; C Niederau; U Kühl; M Schannwell; M Pauschinger; B E Strauer; H P Schultheiss
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Comparative evaluation of left and right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy: differences in complication rate and diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Ali Yilmaz; Ingrid Kindermann; Michael Kindermann; Felix Mahfoud; Christian Ukena; Anastasios Athanasiadis; Stephan Hill; Heiko Mahrholdt; Matthias Voehringer; Michael Schieber; Karin Klingel; Reinhard Kandolf; Michael Böhm; Udo Sechtem
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Tissue characterization of acute myocardial infarction and myocarditis by cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Matthias G Friedrich
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-09

9.  Survival in patients with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing revascularization versus medical therapy: association with end-systolic volume and viability.

Authors:  Deborah H Kwon; Rory Hachamovitch; Zoran B Popovic; Randall C Starling; Milind Y Desai; Scott D Flamm; Bruce W Lytle; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Clinical features of myocardial infarction and myocarditis in young adults: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Cyril Pellaton; Pierre Monney; Andrew James Ludman; Juerg Schwitter; Eric Eeckhout; Olivier Hugli; Olivier Muller
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  6 in total

1.  Assessment of global longitudinal strain using standardized myocardial deformation imaging: a modality independent software approach.

Authors:  Johannes H Riffel; Marius G P Keller; Matthias Aurich; Yannick Sander; Florian Andre; Sorin Giusca; Fabian Aus dem Siepen; Sebastian Seitz; Christian Galuschky; Grigorios Korosoglou; Derliz Mereles; Hugo A Katus; Sebastian J Buss
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Novel CMR techniques enable detection of even mild autoimmune myocarditis in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Michael Bietenbeck; Anca Florian; Zornitsa Shomanova; Karin Klingel; Ali Yilmaz
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Assessment of edema using STIR+ via 3D cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected myocarditis.

Authors:  Michael Jeserich; Bela Merkely; Pascal Schlosser; Simone Kimmel; Gabor Pavlik; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in acute myocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Blissett; Yehuda Chocron; Bojan Kovacina; Jonathan Afilalo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  T1 and T2 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging techniques reveal unapparent myocardial injury in patients with myocarditis.

Authors:  Ulf K Radunski; Gunnar K Lund; Dennis Säring; Sebastian Bohnen; Christian Stehning; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Maxim Avanesov; Enver Tahir; Gerhard Adam; Stefan Blankenberg; Kai Muellerleile
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Role of Smoking in the Evolution of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Laboratory Findings of Acute Myocarditis.

Authors:  Efstathios Detorakis; Rowland Illing; Ismini Lasithiotaki; Emmanouil Foukarakis; Maria Raissaki
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2020-01-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.