Literature DB >> 25314479

Tie strength distribution in scientific collaboration networks.

Qing Ke1, Yong-Yeol Ahn1.   

Abstract

Science is increasingly dominated by teams. Understanding patterns of scientific collaboration and their impacts on the productivity and evolution of disciplines is crucial to understand scientific processes. Electronic bibliography offers a unique opportunity to map and investigate the nature of scientific collaboration. Recent studies have demonstrated a counterintuitive organizational pattern of scientific collaboration networks: densely interconnected local clusters consist of weak ties, whereas strong ties play the role of connecting different clusters. This pattern contrasts itself from many other types of networks where strong ties form communities while weak ties connect different communities. Although there are many models for collaboration networks, no model reproduces this pattern. In this paper, we present an evolution model of collaboration networks, which reproduces many properties of real-world collaboration networks, including the organization of tie strengths, skewed degree and weight distribution, high clustering, and assortative mixing.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25314479     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.032804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys        ISSN: 1539-3755


  4 in total

1.  Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers.

Authors:  Alexander Michael Petersen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Multilayer representation of collaboration networks with higher-order interactions.

Authors:  E Vasilyeva; A Kozlov; K Alfaro-Bittner; D Musatov; A M Raigorodskii; M Perc; S Boccaletti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Time-dependent degree-degree correlations in epileptic brain networks: from assortative to dissortative mixing.

Authors:  Christian Geier; Klaus Lehnertz; Stephan Bialonski
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Scientific success from the perspective of the strength of weak ties.

Authors:  Agata Fronczak; Maciej J Mrowinski; Piotr Fronczak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.