Literature DB >> 25314324

Funding sources for Canadian biorepositories: the role of user fees and strategies to help fill the gap.

Rebecca O Barnes1, Brent Schacter, Sugy Kodeeswaran, Peter H Watson.   

Abstract

Biorepositories, the coordinating hubs for the collection and annotation of biospecimens, are under increasing financial pressure and are challenged to remain sustainable. To gain a better understanding of the current funding situation for Canadian biorepositories and the relative contributions they receive from different funding sources, the Canadian Tumour Repository Network (CTRNet) conducted two surveys. The first survey targeted CTRNet's six main nodes to ascertain the relative funding sources and levels of user fees. The second survey was targeted to a broader range of biorepositories (n=45) to ascertain business practices in application of user fees. The results show that >70% of Canadian biorepositories apply user fees and that the majority apply differential fees to different user groups (academic vs. industry, local vs. international). However, user fees typically comprise only 6% of overall operational budgets. We conclude that while strategies to drive up user fee levels need to be implemented, it is essential for the many stakeholders in the biomedical health research sector to consider this issue in order to ensure the ongoing availability of research biospecimens and data that are standardized, high-quality, and that are therefore capable of meeting research needs.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25314324     DOI: 10.1089/bio.2014.0052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank        ISSN: 1947-5543            Impact factor:   2.300


  6 in total

1.  The Biobank Economic Modeling Tool (BEMT): Online Financial Planning to Facilitate Biobank Sustainability.

Authors:  Hana Odeh; Lisa Miranda; Abhi Rao; Jim Vaught; Howard Greenman; Jeffrey McLean; Daniel Reed; Sarfraz Memon; Benjamin Fombonne; Ping Guan; Helen M Moore
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Achieving and Maintaining Sustainability in Biobanking Through Business Planning, Marketing, and Access.

Authors:  Marianne K Henderson; Kirstin Goldring; Daniel Simeon-Dubach
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Has the biobank bubble burst? Withstanding the challenges for sustainable biobanking in the digital era.

Authors:  Don Chalmers; Dianne Nicol; Jane Kaye; Jessica Bell; Alastair V Campbell; Calvin W L Ho; Kazuto Kato; Jusaku Minari; Chih-Hsing Ho; Colin Mitchell; Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor; Margaret Otlowski; Daniel Thiel; Stephanie M Fullerton; Tess Whitton
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Building Research Support Capacity across Human Health Biobanks during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Jennifer A Byrne; Jane E Carpenter; Candace Carter; Kathleen Phillips; Stephen Braye; Peter H Watson; Amanda Rush
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2021-06-14

5.  Raising to the Challenge: Building a Federated Biobank to Accelerate Translational Research-The University Biobank Limburg.

Authors:  Loes Linsen; Kimberly Vanhees; Evi Vanoppen; Kim Ulenaers; Suzanne Driessens; Joris Penders; Veerle Somers; Piet Stinissen; Jean-Luc Rummens
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-10-22

6.  Biobanking-Budgets and the Role of Pathology Biobanks in Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Chris Andry; Elizabeth Duffy; Christopher A Moskaluk; Shannon McCall; Michael H A Roehrl; Daniel Remick
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2017-05-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.