Lijun Gu1, Ai Kawana-Tachikawa2, Teiichiro Shiino3, Hitomi Nakamura4, Michiko Koga5, Tadashi Kikuchi5, Eisuke Adachi6, Tomohiko Koibuchi6, Takaomi Ishida1, George F Gao7, Masaki Matsushita8, Wataru Sugiura3, Aikichi Iwamoto9, Noriaki Hosoya10. 1. Research Center for Asian Infectious Diseases, the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Japan-China Joint Laboratory of Molecular Immunology and Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China. 2. Division of Infectious Diseases, Advanced Clinical Research Center, the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 3. AIDS Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan. 4. Department of Infectious Disease Control, International Research Center for Infectious Diseases, the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Division of Infectious Diseases and Applied Immunology, Research Hospital, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 5. Division of Infectious Diseases, Advanced Clinical Research Center, the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Division of Infectious Diseases and Applied Immunology, Research Hospital, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 6. Division of Infectious Diseases and Applied Immunology, Research Hospital, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 7. CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China. 8. Biotech Research and Development, Wakunaga Pharmaceutical Corporation, Hiroshima, Japan. 9. Research Center for Asian Infectious Diseases, the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Division of Infectious Diseases, Advanced Clinical Research Center, the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Infectious Disease Control, International Research Center for Infectious Diseases, the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Division of Infectious Diseases and Applied Immunology, Research Hospital, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 10. Division of Infectious Diseases, Advanced Clinical Research Center, the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Infectious Disease Control, International Research Center for Infectious Diseases, the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Drug resistance (DR) of HIV-1 can be examined genotypically or phenotypically. Although sequencing is the gold standard of the genotypic resistance testing (GRT), high-throughput GRT targeted to the codons responsible for DR may be more appropriate for epidemiological studies and public health research. METHODS: We used a Japanese database to design and synthesize sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes (SSOP) for the detection of wild-type sequences and 6 DR mutations in the clade B HIV-1 reverse transcriptase region. We coupled SSOP to microbeads of the Luminex 100 xMAP system and developed a GRT based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-SSOP-Luminex method. RESULTS: Sixteen oligoprobes for discriminating DR mutations from wild-type sequences at 6 loci were designed and synthesized, and their sensitivity and specificity were confirmed using isogenic plasmids. The PCR-SSOP-Luminex DR assay was then compared to direct sequencing using 74 plasma specimens from treatment-naïve patients or those on failing treatment. In the majority of specimens, the results of the PCR-SSOP-Luminex DR assay were concordant with sequencing results: 62/74 (83.8%) for M41, 43/74 (58.1%) for K65, 70/74 (94.6%) for K70, 55/73 (75.3%) for K103, 63/73 (86.3%) for M184 and 68/73 (93.2%) for T215. There were a number of specimens without any positive signals, especially for K65. The nucleotide position of A2723G, A2747G and C2750T were frequent polymorphisms for the wild-type amino acids K65, K66 and D67, respectively, and 14 specimens had the D67N mutation encoded by G2748A. We synthesized 14 additional oligoprobes for K65, and the sensitivity for K65 loci improved from 43/74 (58.1%) to 68/74 (91.9%). CONCLUSIONS: We developed a rapid high-throughput assay for clade B HIV-1 DR mutations, which could be customized by synthesizing oligoprobes suitable for the circulating viruses. The assay could be a useful tool especially for public health research in both resource-rich and resource-limited settings.
BACKGROUND: Drug resistance (DR) of HIV-1 can be examined genotypically or phenotypically. Although sequencing is the gold standard of the genotypic resistance testing (GRT), high-throughput GRT targeted to the codons responsible for DR may be more appropriate for epidemiological studies and public health research. METHODS: We used a Japanese database to design and synthesize sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes (SSOP) for the detection of wild-type sequences and 6 DR mutations in the clade B HIV-1 reverse transcriptase region. We coupled SSOP to microbeads of the Luminex 100 xMAP system and developed a GRT based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-SSOP-Luminex method. RESULTS: Sixteen oligoprobes for discriminating DR mutations from wild-type sequences at 6 loci were designed and synthesized, and their sensitivity and specificity were confirmed using isogenic plasmids. The PCR-SSOP-Luminex DR assay was then compared to direct sequencing using 74 plasma specimens from treatment-naïve patients or those on failing treatment. In the majority of specimens, the results of the PCR-SSOP-Luminex DR assay were concordant with sequencing results: 62/74 (83.8%) for M41, 43/74 (58.1%) for K65, 70/74 (94.6%) for K70, 55/73 (75.3%) for K103, 63/73 (86.3%) for M184 and 68/73 (93.2%) for T215. There were a number of specimens without any positive signals, especially for K65. The nucleotide position of A2723G, A2747G and C2750T were frequent polymorphisms for the wild-type amino acids K65, K66 and D67, respectively, and 14 specimens had the D67N mutation encoded by G2748A. We synthesized 14 additional oligoprobes for K65, and the sensitivity for K65 loci improved from 43/74 (58.1%) to 68/74 (91.9%). CONCLUSIONS: We developed a rapid high-throughput assay for clade B HIV-1 DR mutations, which could be customized by synthesizing oligoprobes suitable for the circulating viruses. The assay could be a useful tool especially for public health research in both resource-rich and resource-limited settings.
Since combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) was introduced, the prognosis of patients with HIV-1 infection has improved dramatically [1], [2]. In resource-rich settings, new classes, new drugs or new formulations of previously-known classes of antiretroviral drugs (ARV) have been introduced continuously for clinical use. Nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance has declined over time in resource-rich settings, presumably reflecting the improvement of treatment regimens [3], [4]. Rates of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance (DR) have remained limited also in resource-limited settings; however, limitation of the first-line and subsequent regimens would be a concern. cART consisting of two NRTIs and one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), most often zidovudine (AZT) + lamivudine (3TC) or stavudine (d4T) + 3TC plus nevirapine (NVP) or efavirenz (EFV), has been widely used as the treatment regimen in the resource-limited settings [5], [6]; consequently, DR might become a larger public health challenge in the developing countries.DR can be examined genotypically or phenotypically [7] (http://www.aidsmap.com/pdf/Resistance-tests/page/1044559/). Although sequencing is the gold standard of the genotypic resistance testing (GRT), high-throughput GRT targeted to the codons responsible for DR may be more convenient and suitable for public health research [8], [9]. We applied the PCR-SSOP-Luminex method [10]–[12] to an HIV-1 GRT. As an initial approach, we focused on designing an assay for six major DR mutations: M41L, K65R, K70R, K103N, M184V and T215Y/F. M41L, K70R, T215F/Y are examples of thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) and associated with AZT and d4T [13] (HIV Drug resistance database, Stanford University, http://hivdb.stanford.edu/index.html). K65R is associated multi-nucleoside and nucleotide DR. Although K65R is selected by nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor tenofovir (TDF) usually, it can be selected by d4T. K103N is highly associated with EFV and NVP resistance. The K103N mutation reduces susceptibility to NVP by 50-flod, and EFV by 20-fold. M184V is highly associated with 3TC and emtricitabine (FTC) resistance, and reduce the susceptibility to 3TC by 200-fold. The monitoring of these six DR mutations should be important for molecular epidemiologic study estimating the efficacy of anti-HIV drugs especially in resource limited settings. We synthesized the oligonucleotides for the primers and probes based on the Japanese data base on reverse transcriptase mutations. In order to validate the initial assay system and examine the flexibility for customization, we focused on the clade B HIV-1 which is most prevalent in Japan. Here we report the results of the comparison between sequencing and the PCR-SSOP-Luminex assay using the specimens of a Japanese cohort.
Methods
PCR-SSOP-Luminex assay
HIV-1 DR genotyping described here is based on the reverse SSOP method coupled with a microsphere beads array platform (Luminex Corporation, Austin, TX, USA). Briefly, the method involves PCR amplification by biotinylated primers, hybridization to nucleotide probes coupled to microbeads, detection of the bound PCR products by streptavidin-phycoerythrin (SAPE) reaction, and quantitation by measurement of median fluorescence intensity (MFI).Color-coded microbeads were coupled to oligoprobes derived from DR mutations or conserved sequences in HIV-1 RT coding region. These synthesized probes were modified at the 5′-end with a terminal amino group and covalently bound to the carboxylated fluorescent microbeads using ethylene dichloride (EDC), following the procedures recommended by the manufacturer (Wakunaga Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Hiroshima, Japan). Briefly, 6.25×105 carboxylated microbeads were suspended in 50 µl of 0.1 M MES (2-(N-morpholino) ethane sulfonic acid, pH 4.5 (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto Techno Research Park, Kumamoto, Japan). Afterwards, 0.5 µM of amine-substituted oligonucleotide probes was added, followed by 100 mg/ml EDC (1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimido hydrochloride) (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA), and the mixture was incubated in the dark for 30 min at 25°C. The EDC addition and incubation were repeated twice and the microbeads were washed once with 0.02% Tween-20 and once with 0.1% SDS. After the final wash, the pellets were resuspended in 50 µl TE buffer (pH 8.0), and counted on a hemocytometer. The concentration of fluorescence-labeled microbeads coupled to oligonucleotide probes (oligobeads) was adjusted to 8000–12000/µl, and oligobeads were stored at 4°C in the dark.Five-microliter aliquots of the 5′-biotinlabeled amplified DNA were added to wells in a 96-well PCR tray containing 5 µl/well of denaturation solution, and allowed to denature for 5 min at RT. Hybridization mixture was prepared using oligobeads stocks, SAPE and hybridization solution, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Wakunaga Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Hiroshima, Japan). Twenty-five-microliter aliquots of hybridization mixture containing 500 each sequence-specific oligobeads were added to each well. The amplicons were hybridized at 55°C for 30 min using the thermal cycler. Hybridized amplicons were washed twice with 75 µl of wash solution in each well. Reaction outcomes were measured by the Luminex 100 flow cytometer that is equipped with two types of lasers. The bead populations were detected and identified using the 635 nm laser. The SAPE fluorescence of the biotin labeled amplicons that had hybridized to the oligobeads was quantitated using the 532 nm laser. The MFI of SAPE was used to quantify the amount of DNA bound to the oligobeads. Assays were performed in triplicate.
Site-directed mutagenesis and plasmid construction
To assess the feasibility of the assay system, we chose cloned SF2 genome (GenBank accession number K02007) as a template. Synthesized PCR fragments with DR mutations created by site-directed mutagenesis were inserted into the SF2 genome. The numbering system used to refer to DR mutations was based on HXB2 genome (HXB2 location 2485–3309, GenBank accession number K03455) sequences. The SF2 and HXB2 genome had the same sequence in the regions covered by the probes.Plasmid p9B/R7 from the HIV-1SF2 strain was a kind gift of Dr. T. Shioda (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan) [14], [15]. An Xho I- BamH I fragment including the pol gene from p9B/R7 was subcloned into pBluescript II SK (+) (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). As shown in Fig. 1A, various DR mutations were introduced into the Xho I- BamH I fragment of the plasmid by site-directed mutagenesis using oligonucleotides and PCR methods as previously described [16], and were confirmed by sequencing.
Figure 1
Schematic representation of PCR amplification and sequences of primers for PCR and sequencing.
(A) Top: Site-directed mutagenesis using oligonucleotide is shown using K103N as an example. Desired mutations in the reverse transcriptase gene were engineered in two PCR fragments, then incorporated into a larger fragment (1050 bp, HXB2 location 2388–3425) by the second PCR, and cloned into pBluescript II SK (+) at XhoI-BamHI sites. Bottom: Negative strand cDNA was synthesized from patients’ plasma. After the first strand PCR using RT1F and RT1R as primers, Fragment a or Fragment c were amplified by nested PCR. (B) Primer sequences for PCR amplification and sequencing.
Schematic representation of PCR amplification and sequences of primers for PCR and sequencing.
(A) Top: Site-directed mutagenesis using oligonucleotide is shown using K103N as an example. Desired mutations in the reverse transcriptase gene were engineered in two PCR fragments, then incorporated into a larger fragment (1050 bp, HXB2 location 2388–3425) by the second PCR, and cloned into pBluescript II SK (+) at XhoI-BamHI sites. Bottom: Negative strand cDNA was synthesized from patients’ plasma. After the first strand PCR using RT1F and RT1R as primers, Fragment a or Fragment c were amplified by nested PCR. (B) Primer sequences for PCR amplification and sequencing.
Clinical specimens
Sixty subjects were selected from among patients participating in an ongoing study on microbes at an HIV outpatient clinic affiliated with the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo (IMSUT). The study was approved by the internal review board of IMSUT (20-31-1120), and all subjects provided written informed consent. The median HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cells count at sampling were 4.15 (range 2.60–5.88) log 10 copies/ml and 264 (range: 9–902) cells/µl, respectively. Seventy-four specimens from 60 patients were analyzed in this study. Forty-eight patients contributed one plasma specimen, 10 patients contributed two plasma specimens from different time points, and two patients contributed three separate plasma specimens. Twenty-two specimens were from patients who were treatment-naïve when the plasma specimens were obtained. The remaining 52 specimens were from patients on failing treatment including NRTI at the time of sample collection.
Viral RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and PCR amplification
Viral RNA was extracted from 140 µl plasma using QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) and eluted with 60 µl AVE buffer. For cDNA synthesis, 55 µl of RNA solution was mixed with 5 µl of 100 pmol/µl random primer (TaKaRa Bio, Otsu, Shiga, Japan) or specific primer, RT1R (Fig. 1B), and 5 µl of 10 mM dNTPs, and denatured at 70°C for 10 min. The RT mixture containing 20 µl of 5× First-Strand buffer, 5 µl of 0.1 M DTT, 5 µl of RNaseOUT Recombinant RNase inhibitor (40 U/µl; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) and 5 µl of SuperScript III RT (200 U/µl, Invitrogen) was added to the 65 µl denatured viral RNA-primer-dNTP mixture. The reaction mixture (100 µl final volume) was incubated at 25°C for 5 min for annealing and then at 55°C for 60 min for reverse transcription. The reaction was inactivated by heating at 70°C for 15 min.RT gene fragments were amplified by nested PCR from cDNAs or by single PCR from plasmids. For the first reaction a 1050 bp fragment from the RT coding region was amplified from 5 µl aliquots of cDNAs using RT1F and RT1R as outer primers in a reaction mixture containing 50 µl of 1×Prime STAR buffer, 0.2 mM of each dNTPs, 0.5 µM of each primer, and 0.5 µl Prime STAR HS DNA Polymerase (25 U/µl, TaKaRa Bio, Otsu, Shiga, Japan). Amplification conditions consisted of 35 cycles denaturation at 98°C for 10 s, annealing at 55°C for 5 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s.For the second reaction of the nested PCR and for the single PCR from plasmids (0.1 pg), RT coding fragments were amplified in two PCR fragments using two 5′ biotinylated primer sets, PS1 and PS2, as described previously [17]. The PS1 primer set produced a 547 bp amplicon that was used to detect M41L, K65R, K70R, and K103N, and the PS2 primer set produced a 512 bp amplicon that was used to detect K103N, M184V, and T215Y/F (Fig. 1A). The reaction mixture used 5 µl of the first PCR products or 0.1 pg of plasmid DNA in a final volume of 50 µl, as described above, with amplification conditions as follows: 25 cycles (second nested PCR) or 35 cycles (plasmid DNA amplification) of denaturation at 98°C for 10 s, annealing at 55°C for 5 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min. The PCR amplicons were used for Luminex detection or direct sequencing.
Sequencing
PCR products were purified with the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) and were directly sequenced in both directions using ABI 3130xl genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and Big Dye terminator V3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems). In the case of sequence ambiguity due to a coexistence of multiple nucleotides, we confirmed the sequence by cloning and sequencing. For cloning and sequencing, the purified PCR fragments were phosphorylated using T4 polynucleotide kinase (TaKaRa Bio, Otsu, Shiga, Japan) and inserted into the dephosphorylated EcoRV restriction site of pBluescript II SK(+). Inserts were sequenced using T7 and Rev universal primers (Fig. 1B).
HIV-1 Japanese surveillance database
In Japan 10 university hospitals, 5 medical centers, 5 public health laboratories, and the National Institute of Infectious Diseases are collaborating in the surveillance of newly diagnosed HIV/AIDS cases. HIV/AIDSpatients with both acute and chronic infections, newly diagnosed at these centers since January 2003 were enrolled [18]. Prevalence of DR codons in these patients was determined by analysis of sequences of clade B HIV-1 reverse transcriptase positions 1–240 amino acids.
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA) was used for statistical data analysis. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05.
Results
Design of oligoprobes based on the database of clade B HIV-1 sequences in Japan
Based on the frequency of the codon usage in the Japanese surveillance database for amino acids M41, K65, K70, K103, M184 and T215 in RT gene, we designed the nucleotide sequence of 18 oligoprobes for DR mutation and 5 standard probes (Table 1). We adopted nucleotide sequences of HXB2 strain for the flanking sequences. Synthesized oligoprobes could cover 71.2%, 59.3%, 80.8%, 71.1%, 85.7% and 71.7% of M41, K65, K70, K103, M184 and T215, respectively (Table 1). Five standard probes were designed in the conserved region of RT gene and used as the assay control.
Table 1
Design of oligoprobes based on clade B HIV-1 sequences from Japanese surveillance database.
Locus
geneticcode
Frequency(%)
Name of probe
Oligoprobes
Nucleotide sequence(5'-3')
100% match isolates ofdatabase
M41
TGT ACA GAA ATG GAA
M41-ATG
795/795(100)
M41M-ATG
GTACAGAAATGGAA
— --- --- --- ---
618/868(71.2%)
M41L-TTG
109/180(60.6)
M41L-TTG
GTACAGAATTGGAA
— --- --- T— ---
M41L-CTG
69/180(38.3)
M41L-CTG
GTACAGAACTGGAA
— --- --- C— ---
M41L-TTA
1/180(0.6)
M41L-TTR
1/180(0.6)
K65
ATA AAG AAA AAA GAC AGT
K65-AAA
961/1012(95.0)
K65K-AAA
ATAAAGAAAAAAGACAG
--- --- --- --- --- —
516/870(59.3%)
K65-AAG
30/1012(3.0)
K65-AAR
21/1012(2.1)
K65R-AGA
7/7(100)
K65R-AGA
ATAAAGAGAAAAGACAG
--- --- -G- --- --- —
K65R-AGG
0/7(0.0)
K70
GAC AGT ACT AAA TGG AGA
K70-AAA
849/885(95.9)
K70K-AAA-1
GACAGTACTAAATG
--- --- --- --- —
621/769(80.8%)
K70K-AAA-2
GTACTAAATGGAGA
--- --- --- --- ---
K70-AAG
17/885(1.9)
K70-AAR
19/885(2.1)
K70R-AGA
85/88(96.6)
K70R-AGA
GTACTAGATGGAGA
--- --- -G- --- ---
K70R-AGG
0/88(0.0)
K70R-AGG
GTACTAGGTGGAGA
--- --- -GG --- ---
K70R-AGR
3/88(3.4)
K103
TTA AAA AAG AAA AAA TCA GTA
K103-AAA
815/867(94.0)
K103K-AAA
AAAAAAGAAAAAATCAG
- --- --- --- --- --- -
558/785(71.1%)
K103-AAG
25/867(2.9)
K103-AAR
27/867(3.1)
K103N-AAC
112/128(87.5)
K103N-AAC
AAAAAAGAACAAATCAG
- --- --- —C --- --- -
K103N-AAT
3/128(2.3)
K103N-AAT
AAAAAAGAATAAATCAGT
- --- --- —T --- --- —
K103N-AAY
13/128(10.2)
M184
TAT CAA TAC ATG GAT GAT
M184-ATG
659/659(100)
M184M-ATG
TATCAATACATGGATG
--- --- --- --- --- -
761/888(85.7%)
M184V-GTG
295/335(88.1)
M184V-GTG
TATCAATACGTGGATG
--- --- --- G— --- -
M184V-GTA
14/335(4.2)
M184V-GTR
26/335(7.8)
T215
TGG GGA TTT ACC ACA CCA
T215-ACC
692/724(95.6)
T215T-ACC-1
GGGGATTTACCACA
— --- --- --- ---
583/813(71.7%)
T215T-ACC-2
GGGGATTTACCACACCA
— --- --- --- --- ---
T215-ACT
13/724(1.8)
T215-ACA
7/724(1.0)
T215-ACG
3/724(0.4)
T215-ACY
8/724(1.1)
T215-ACM
1/724(0.1)
T215F-TTC
54/54(100)
T215F-TTC
GGGGATTTTTCACAC
— --- --- TT- ---
T215Y-TAC
182/185(98.4)
T215Y-TAC
GGGGATTTTACACAC
— --- --- TA- --- -
T215Y-TAT
2/185(1.1)
T215Y-TAY
1/185(0.5)
Standardprobes
S2582
ATTAAAGCCAGGAATGGAT
S2693
AAAAATTGGGCCTGAAAAT
S3230
CCTTTGGATGGGTTATGAA
S3252
CATCCTGATAAATGGACAG
S3243
TATGAACTCCATCCTGA
R: Mixed base of A and G; Y: Mixed base of C and T; M: Mixed base of C and A.
R: Mixed base of A and G; Y: Mixed base of C and T; M: Mixed base of C and A.
Evaluation of PCR-SSOP-Luminex DR assay using cloned HIV-1
We examined the sensitivity and specificity of the PCR-SSOP-Luminex DR assay using cloned HIV-1. The test fragments were amplified (Fig. 2A), and the amplicons were hybridized to the 16 oligobeads. We performed three independent assays with triplicate hybridization and detection in each assay. The mean positive signal and standard deviation were 5237±1398 (Fig. 2B). The CV% of positive signal and standard deviation were 10.1% ±10.7. The mean of negative signal and standard deviation were 131.2±69.4. The CV% of negative signal and standard deviation were 21.6±23.6 (mean ± S.D.). MFIs of hybridization signals were clearly high only when the oligoprobes matched the mutations in the fragments (Fig. 2B). These data confirmed that the assay system could discriminate one base mismatch at M41, K65, K70, K103, M184 and T215 codons in the plasmid-probe model system.
Figure 2
Validation of PCR-SSOP-Luminex assay using plasmids as templates.
(A) Agarose gel electrophoresis of amplified fragments. Lanes 1–6: Fragment a (547 bp). Lanes 7–14: Fragment c (512 bp). 1, wild type; 2, M41L-TTG; 3, M41L-CTG; 4, K65R-AGA; 5, 70R-AGA; 6, 70R-AGG; 7, wild type; 8, 103N-AAC; 9, K103N-AAT; 10, M184V-GTG; 11, T215Y-TAC; 12, T215F-TTC. (B) Median fluorescence intensities (MFIs). The plasmid in the test sample is indicated on the top of each panel. Oligoprobes used for detection are indicated at the bottom. Matched results are shown as black bars, mismatched results as white bars. Assays were performed in triplicate. The mean ± standard deviation is shown at the top of each bar.
Validation of PCR-SSOP-Luminex assay using plasmids as templates.
(A) Agarose gel electrophoresis of amplified fragments. Lanes 1–6: Fragment a (547 bp). Lanes 7–14: Fragment c (512 bp). 1, wild type; 2, M41L-TTG; 3, M41L-CTG; 4, K65R-AGA; 5, 70R-AGA; 6, 70R-AGG; 7, wild type; 8, 103N-AAC; 9, K103N-AAT; 10, M184V-GTG; 11, T215Y-TAC; 12, T215F-TTC. (B) Median fluorescence intensities (MFIs). The plasmid in the test sample is indicated on the top of each panel. Oligoprobes used for detection are indicated at the bottom. Matched results are shown as black bars, mismatched results as white bars. Assays were performed in triplicate. The mean ± standard deviation is shown at the top of each bar.Next, we examined the sensitivity to detect a particular sequence in a mixture for each DR-related site. The plasmids carrying the wild type and mutant sequences were mixed at various ratios. In samples containing only the wild type sequences, the mean background signal (% ±2SD) was 2.0% ±1.2, 4.1% ±2.6, 3.3% ±1.2, 4.6% ±1.8, 6.2% ±3.2 and 3.3% ±0.4 at M41, K65, K70, K103, M184 and T215, respectively (Fig. 3B). The signal for the mutant was judged positive when “% signal” from the mutant oligobeads exceeded the mean + 2SD; 3.2%, 6.7%, 4.5%, 6.4%, 9.4%, 3.7% at M41, K65, K70, K103, M184 and T215, respectively. Actual signals from the mutant oligoprobes at 9∶1 (wild type:mutant) mixture at these sites was 5.1%, 23.6%, 19.2%, 10.7%, 12.3%, 9.8%, respectively. Therefore, we infer that the assay can detect 10% DR mutants in the population. There was a big variation (5.1 to 23.6%) in detection of 10% mixtures. We suppose that the difference in minor variant detection could be caused by the melting temperature (GC content and length). Although we compared the GC content and probe length, we could not find a reasonable explanation from this list (data not shown).
Figure 3
Assay sensitivity in a mixture.
(A) Agarose gel electrophoresis of mixtures of amplified fragments. Left panel: Fragment a (547 bp). Right panel: Fragment c (512 bp). Wild-type:mutant ratio; Lanes 1 (10∶0); 2 (9∶1); 3 (8∶2); 4 (7∶3); 5 (5∶5); 6 (3∶7); 7 (2∶8); 8 (1∶9); 9 (0∶10). (B) Signals from wild type probes (black bars) and mutant probes (white bars) in each mixture. “% of signal” was calculated by “MFI of wild type or mutant signal” divided by “MFI of wild type plus mutant signal” and multiplied by 100. Triplicate experiments were performed three times. “% of signal” is shown with standard deviations.
Assay sensitivity in a mixture.
(A) Agarose gel electrophoresis of mixtures of amplified fragments. Left panel: Fragment a (547 bp). Right panel: Fragment c (512 bp). Wild-type:mutant ratio; Lanes 1 (10∶0); 2 (9∶1); 3 (8∶2); 4 (7∶3); 5 (5∶5); 6 (3∶7); 7 (2∶8); 8 (1∶9); 9 (0∶10). (B) Signals from wild type probes (black bars) and mutant probes (white bars) in each mixture. “% of signal” was calculated by “MFI of wild type or mutant signal” divided by “MFI of wild type plus mutant signal” and multiplied by 100. Triplicate experiments were performed three times. “% of signal” is shown with standard deviations.
Identification of DR mutations in clinical specimens by sequencing
In order to determine the sequence, we amplified the RT gene in two separate fragments from frozen plasma (Fig. 1A). We succeeded to amplify fragment a (containing M41, K65, K70) from all 74 specimens, but failed to amplify fragment c (containing K103, M184, T215) in one patient. Infection with clade B HIV-1 was confirmed by phylogenetic analysis of the RT gene. DR mutations were found at codons M41L (n = 22), K65R (n = 3), K70R (n = 10), K103N (n = 7), M184V (n = 21) and T215Y/F (n = 22) in 40 specimens (Table 2).
Table 2
Comparison of the results between sequencing and PCR-SSOP-Luminex assay.
Position
Aminoacid
Codons
Number of specimens (percentage)
Direct sequencing
PCR-SSOP-Luminex
41
Met
ATG
52 (70.3)
41 (55.4)
Leu
TTG
16 (21.6)
16 (21.6)
CTG
5 (6.8)
5 (6.8)
Met, Leu mix
1 (1.4)
0
No reaction
-
12 (16.2)
65
Lys
AAA
64 (86.5)
41 (55.4)
AAG
4 (5.4)
0
AAA, AAG mix
3 (4.1)
2 (2.7)
Arg
AGA
3 (4.1)
0
No reaction
-
31 (41.9)
70
Lys
AAA
62 (83.8)
61 (82.4)
AAG
2 (2.7)
0
Arg
AGA
8 (10.8)
8 (10.8)
AGG
1 (1.4)
1 (1.4)
Lys, Arg mix
1 (1.4)
0
No reaction
-
4 (5.4)
103
Lys
AAA
60 (82.2)
50 (68.5)
AAG
1 (1.4)
0
AAA, AAG mix
1 (1.4)
0
Asn
AAC
4 (5.5)
2 (2.7)
AAT
2 (2.7)
2 (2.7)
AAC, AAT mix
1 (1.4)
1 (1.4)
Arg
AGA
4 (5.5)
0
No reaction
-
18 (24.7)
184
Met
ATG
52 (71.2)
46 (63.0)
Val
GTG
19 (26.0)
16 (21.9)
GTA
1 (1.4)
0
Met, Val mix
1 (1.4)
1 (1.4)
No reaction
-
10 (13.7)
215
Thr
ACC
48 (65.8)
46 (63.0)
Tyr
TAC
16 (21.9)
15 (20.5)
Phe
TTC
6 (8.2)
6 (8.2)
Thr, Tyr mix
1 (1.4)
1 (1.4)
Other
2 (2.7)
0
No reaction
-
5 (6.8)
Identification of DR mutations in clinical specimens by the PCR-SSOP-Luminex DR assay
We performed the PCR-SSOP-Luminex DR assay on 74 specimens whose DR mutations had been sequenced (Fig. 4). The lowest MFI of five standard probes (MFI = 837.5) was assumed as the cut off value for the positive signal. We synthesized two additional wild-type oligoprobes (K70K-AAA-2 and T215T-ACC-2), since the original oligobeads (K70K-AAA-1 and T215T-ACC-1) gave marginal signals in some specimens (Table 1 and Fig. 4). By the modification of the position of the target codons and the length of flanking sequences, we could obtain higher MFI signals. Successful determination of the genotypes was 62/74 (83.8%), 43/74 (58.1%), 70/74 (94.6%), 55/73 (75.3%), 63/73 (86.3%) and 68/73 (93.2%) for M41, K65, K70, K103, M184 and T215, respectively. The median of background signal (without sample) was MFI = 178, and median negative signal from the patients sample was MFI = 181 (interquartile range (IQR) = 101–307). PCR-SSOP-Luminex assays create very low background and non-specific signal from negative samples. When the genotype was successfully determined by the PCR-SSOP-Luminex assay, the results were always concordant with those of sequencing (Table 2). We inferred that the failure to determine the genotype was due to sequence diversities. Therefore, we decided to customize the assay according to the sequences around K65 which had the lowest success rate (58.1%).
Figure 4
PCR-SSOP-Luminex DR assay of clinical samples.
Results of 18 probes for 6 DR loci and 5 standard probes are shown. Each dot represents the mean of triplicates. Dashed line indicates the cut-off value, the lowest MFI among 5 standard probes (MFI = 837.5).
PCR-SSOP-Luminex DR assay of clinical samples.
Results of 18 probes for 6 DR loci and 5 standard probes are shown. Each dot represents the mean of triplicates. Dashed line indicates the cut-off value, the lowest MFI among 5 standard probes (MFI = 837.5).
Customization of oligoprobes to detect genetic diversity around K65
In 31 specimens without signals, the sequence around K65 was very diverse, especially at codons K65, K66 and K67 (Table 3). The nucleotide position of A2723G, A2747G and C2750T were frequent polymorphism for the wild type amino acid K65, K66 and D67, respectively. Fourteen specimens had a G2748A mutation that led to D67N, a thymidine analogue mutation [19]. Based on these results we synthesized 10 additional oligoprobes (Table 4).
Table 3
Sequence diversity around K65 in the 31 specimens.
Amino acid (HXB2-wt)
I63 K64 K65 K66 D67 S68
Nucleotide (HXB2-wt)
ATA AAG AAA AAA GAC AGT
Number of specimens
2747
K66K-AAG
--- --- --- —G --- —
10
2747 2748
K66K-AAG/D67N-AAC
--- --- --- —G A— —
5
2748
D67N-AAC
--- --- --- --- A— —
3
2750
D67D-GAT
--- --- --- --- —T —
1
2748
K65K-AAG/D67N-AAC
--- --- —G --- A— —
2
2748
K65K-AAR/D67N-AAC
--- --- —R --- A— —a
1
2747 2748
K65K-AAG/K66K-AAG/D67N-AAC
--- --- —G —G A— —
1
2741 2748
K65K-AAG/D67N-AAC/K64K-AAA
--- —A —G --- A— —
1
2747 2750
K66K-AAG/D67D-GAT
--- --- --- —G —T —
1
2748 2750
D67N-AAT
--- --- --- --- A-T —
1
2750 2751
D67D-GAT/S68G-GGT
--- --- --- --- —T G-
2
2747
K65R-AGA/K66K-AAG
--- --- -G- —G --- —
1
2750
K65R-AGA/D67D-GAT
--- --- -G- --- —T —
2
R: Mixed base of A and G.
Table 4
Design of additional oligoprobes based on clinical samples.
Locus
Name of probe
Oligoprobes
Nucleotide sequence (5'-3')
K65
ATA AAG AAA AAA GAC AGT ACT
K66K-AAG
ATAAAGAAAAAGGACAG
--- --- --- —G --- —
K65R-AGA/K66K-AAG
ATAAAGAGAAAGGACAG
--- --- -G- —G --- —
K66K-AAG/D67N-AAC
ATAAAGAAAAAGAACAG
--- --- --- —G A— ---
K65R-AGA/K66K-AAG/D67N-AAC
ATAAAGAGAAAGAACAG
--- --- -G- —G A— —
D67N-AAC
ATAAAGAAAAAAAACAGT
--- --- --- --- A— ---
K65R-AGA/D67N-AAC
ATAAAGAGAAAAAACAG
--- --- -G- --- A— ---
D67D-GAT
ATAAAGAAAAAAGATAGT
--- --- --- --- —T ---
K65R-AGA/D67D-GAT
ATAAAGAGAAAAGATAGT
--- --- -G- --- —T ---
K65K-AAG
ATAAAGAAGAAAGACAG
--- --- —G --- --- —
K65K-AAG/D67N-AAC
ATAAAGAAGAAAAACAGTA
--- --- —G --- A— --- -
R: Mixed base of A and G.The specificity of the newly added oligoprobes was confirmed by the plasmids carrying the mutation (data not shown). Customization of the assay decreased the number of specimens without signals from 31 to 6 (Fig. 5).
Figure 5
Improvement of the detection by the additional probes at K65 locus.
The ordinate shows the percentage of the genotype at K65 locus determined by the PCR-SSOP-Luminex DR assay. One hundred % is the sample number (74) successfully amplified by PCR.
Improvement of the detection by the additional probes at K65 locus.
The ordinate shows the percentage of the genotype at K65 locus determined by the PCR-SSOP-Luminex DR assay. One hundred % is the sample number (74) successfully amplified by PCR.
Discussion
We developed a PCR-SSOP-Luminex DR assay that can identify 6 clinically important DR mutations for NRTI and NNRTI in a single well. To simplify the development, we chose clade B virus and focused on the following mutations in the RT region: M41L, K65R, K70R, K103N, M184V and T215Y/F. We designed a series of capture probes according to the database of the Japanese patients. MFI from hybridization with the corresponding probes was greater than 20-fold signal-to-noise ratio in plasmid experiments (Fig. 2), at least 2-fold signal-to-noise ratio using clinical samples (Fig. 4). The initial positive reaction was as low as 58.1% (43/74) in the highly polymorphic K65 region. The use of additional probes designed to match sequences in the patients’ specimens improved the detection rate to 91.9% (68/74), demonstrating that the PCR-SSOP-Luminex assay can be customized to reflect sequences of the viruses prevalent in a given environment.Transmission of viral strains with major DR mutations can reduce the efficacy of first-line regimens. Since the first report of a horizontal transmission of HIV-1 harboring a zidovudine-resistant mutation [20], 5% to 15% of treatment-naïve, HIV-1-infected individuals harbored the viruses with DR mutations in early 2000s in resource-rich settings [21]–[24]. It was suggested that transmission of drug resistance in the resource-rich settings can remain stable and at a low level [25]. However, in Japan where the transmission of drug-resistant viruses has historically been low, there seems to be an increasing trend [18], [26]. Rates of transmitted HIV drug resistance has remained limited also in resource-limited settings (http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/drugresistance/en/), however, limitation on the first line and subsequent regimens would be a concern. Continued surveillance of drug resistant HIV-1 is warranted.There are some multiplex strategies to detect the single-nucleotide differences, LigAmp assay [27], [28], Nanostring assays [29], oligonucleotide ligation assay-based DNA chip [30], AS-PCR [31], [32]. These assays provide substantial improvements in their detection sensitivity over conventional sequencing-based assays, however major limitation of these assays could be detecting one or few DR mutations at a time. PCR-SSOP-Liminex assay should be able to accommodate more DR mutations than the others.One limitation of PCR-SSOP-Luminex assay is the assay sensitivity caused by diversity of HIV. We were able to detect DR mutations that constituted 10% of the mixture in the isogenic system using plasmids. Even after successful amplification, we could not get signal in considerable number of patient’s specimens. By comparison with cloning and sequencing, we estimate that at least 20% mutant was necessary in the patient’s specimens to be detected by the PCR-SSOP-Luminex assay. The sensitivity of detection by Sanger sequencing has been reported to be ∼20% [33], [34]. Sanger sequencing and PCR-SSOP-Luminex had approximately the same detection sensitivity on patient materials. In Sanger sequencing, nucleotide sequences are determined by the wave height. When the virus in the plasma is a mixture of the wild type and a mutant, each nucleotide is displayed as two waves in the same locus with different height according to the fraction in the sample. In the case of PCR-SSOP-Luminex, the wild type or mutant nucleotides are detected independently by the signal bound to the proper probes. Therefore, as we showed partly in this paper, the mutant detection by PCR-SSOP-Luminex assay could be improved by further customization to the circulating viruses. In our paper, we used maximum 23 oligoprobes in one tube or well. The evaluation of assay volume etc. would be necessary to determine actually possible maximum number of ologibrobes in one tube. 100 color-coded beads are available, theoretically, 100 probes could be applied (http://www.luminexcorp.com/Products/Instruments/Luminex100200/). Since the wild type or mutant nucleotides are detected as the signal of hybridized probes for each in the PCR-SSOP-Luminex assay, inclusion of multiplex probes based on the codon usages for the DR mutations and the sequence variations in the flanking region of circulating viruses would improve the detection. According to our results, we could develop, validate and customized PCR-SSOP-Luminex assay for detecting DR mutations at six positions in HIV-1 RT gene. The study numbers are very limited and we worked only on subtype B HIV-1 in this article. HIV-1 diversity is notoriously huge and sequences in an individual could be more diverse than acutely expanding viruses in the field [35]. Diagnostic use in individual patients is far from the actual application at present. We believe the assay would be more suitable for molecular epidemiological studies detecting regional trends of HIV-1 DR mutation over time.PCR-SSOP-Luminex assay were widely used for the detection of papillomavirus, influenza surveillance etc. in developing countries [36], [37]. Furthermore, application of Luminex technology to other pathogen (C. difficile, Norovirus, E. coli or Salmonella, Rotavirus A, Campylobacter, Shigella etc.) were reported recently [38]. It would be feasible to expect that the use of Luminex technology will be wide-spread in the near future. Furthermore, the application of PCR-SSOP-Luminex DR assay to non-clade B HIV-1 is currently under development. Future studies include refinement of the assay for use with specimens co-infected with HIV-1 and HBV.
Conclusions
We have developed a rapid high-throughput assay for DR testing. The assay can be customized by adding oligoprobes suitable for the circulating viruses. The assay may turn out to be a useful method especially for public health research in both resource-rich and resource-limited settings.
Authors: A Erice; D L Mayers; D G Strike; K J Sannerud; F E McCutchan; K Henry; H H Balfour Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1993-04-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Chanjuan Shi; Susan H Eshleman; Dana Jones; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Li Hua; Antony R Parker; Charles J Yeo; Ralph H Hruban; Michael G Goggins; James R Eshleman Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2004-10-21 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: F J Palella; K M Delaney; A C Moorman; M O Loveless; J Fuhrer; G A Satten; D J Aschman; S D Holmberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-03-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Annemarie M J Wensing; David A van de Vijver; Gioacchino Angarano; Birgitta Asjö; Claudia Balotta; Enzo Boeri; Ricardo Camacho; Maire-Laure Chaix; Dominique Costagliola; Andrea De Luca; Inge Derdelinckx; Zehava Grossman; Osamah Hamouda; Angelos Hatzakis; Robert Hemmer; Andy Hoepelman; Andrzej Horban; Klaus Korn; Claudia Kücherer; Thomas Leitner; Clive Loveday; Eilidh MacRae; Irina Maljkovic; Carmen de Mendoza; Laurence Meyer; Claus Nielsen; Eline L Op de Coul; Vidar Ormaasen; Dimitris Paraskevis; Luc Perrin; Elisabeth Puchhammer-Stöckl; Lidia Ruiz; Mika Salminen; Jean-Claude Schmit; Francois Schneider; Rob Schuurman; Vincent Soriano; Grzegorz Stanczak; Maja Stanojevic; Anne-Mieke Vandamme; Kristel Van Laethem; Michela Violin; Karin Wilbe; Sabine Yerly; Maurizio Zazzi; Charles A Boucher Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2005-08-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Patricia Cane; Ian Chrystie; David Dunn; Barry Evans; Anna Maria Geretti; Hannah Green; Andrew Phillips; Deenan Pillay; Kholoud Porter; Anton Pozniak; Caroline Sabin; Erasmus Smit; Jonathan Weber; Mark Zuckerman Journal: BMJ Date: 2005-11-18